linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-04-01 Thread Debian Installer
Mapping testing to testing-proposed-updates. Accepted: gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb gspca-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb to

linux-modules-extra-2.6 override disparity

2007-04-01 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): unionfs-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb: package says section is admin, override says misc. unionfs-modules-2.6-686_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb: package says section is admin,

Bug#113036: hi from kendra

2007-04-01 Thread kendra
Hi, i am here sitting in the internet caffe. Found your email and decided to write. I am 25 y.o.girl. I have a picture if you want. No need to reply here as this is not may email. Write me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processed: Re: Bug#417121: pcmciautils: Data Corruption while using Texas Instrument PCI7420 --CardBus

2007-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 417121 linux-2.6 Bug#417121: pcmciautils: Data Corruption while using Texas Instrument PCI7420 --CardBus Bug reassigned from package `pcmciautils' to `linux-2.6'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#417172: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: failure to mount root fs if usb drive plugged in (-486 not affected, tho)

2007-04-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 Severity: important If a usb drive is plugged in and operational during boot of the -686 kernel I get a failure to mount root filesystem. The usb drive becomes /dev/sda and the 3ware raid becomes /dev/sdb. Oddly enough, the -486

Bug#417172: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: failure to mount root fs if usb drive plugged in (-486 not affected, tho))

2007-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:00:39 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#417172: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: failure to mount root fs if usb drive plugged in (-486 not affected, tho) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: 2.6.21-rc5

2007-04-01 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi, On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:22:38PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: any voices against basing trunk on latest upstream? have an i386 working tree to commit. should 2.6.20 first be copied to sid? IMHO we should upload 2.6.20.4 to unstable, and 2.6.21-rc to experimental. Best regards

2.6.20 [was Re: 2.6.21-rc5 ]

2007-04-01 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: I'm running it nearly five days. I'm on amd64, without sysfs, did some dvd burning, playing music have strange random glitches (maybe some more NO_HZ problems). But i would suggest to wait next rc, it's going to be very soon. why waiting? it would

Re: 2.6.20 [was Re: 2.6.21-rc5 ]

2007-04-01 Thread Oleg Verych
01-04-2007, maximilian attems: On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: I'm running it nearly five days. I'm on amd64, without sysfs, did some dvd burning, playing music have strange random glitches (maybe some more NO_HZ problems). But i would suggest to wait next rc, it's going to be very

Re: 2.6.21-rc5

2007-04-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:22:38PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: any voices against basing trunk on latest upstream? have an i386 working tree to commit. should 2.6.20 first be copied to sid? IMHO we should upload 2.6.20.4 to unstable,