Mapping testing to testing-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb
gspca-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
unionfs-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb: package says section is admin,
override says misc.
unionfs-modules-2.6-686_2.6.18-7+etch2_i386.deb: package says section is admin,
Hi,
i am here sitting in the internet caffe. Found your email and
decided to write. I am 25 y.o.girl.
I have a picture if you want. No need to reply here as
this is not may email. Write me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 417121 linux-2.6
Bug#417121: pcmciautils: Data Corruption while using Texas Instrument PCI7420
--CardBus
Bug reassigned from package `pcmciautils' to `linux-2.6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12
Severity: important
If a usb drive is plugged in and operational during boot of the -686 kernel I
get a failure to
mount root filesystem. The usb drive becomes /dev/sda and the 3ware raid
becomes /dev/sdb.
Oddly enough, the -486
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:00:39 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#417172: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: failure to mount root fs
if usb drive plugged in (-486 not affected, tho)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:22:38PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
any voices against basing trunk on latest upstream?
have an i386 working tree to commit.
should 2.6.20 first be copied to sid?
IMHO we should upload 2.6.20.4 to unstable, and 2.6.21-rc to
experimental.
Best regards
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
I'm running it nearly five days. I'm on amd64, without sysfs, did some
dvd burning, playing music have strange random glitches (maybe some
more NO_HZ problems).
But i would suggest to wait next rc, it's going to be very soon.
why waiting?
it would
01-04-2007, maximilian attems:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
I'm running it nearly five days. I'm on amd64, without sysfs, did some
dvd burning, playing music have strange random glitches (maybe some
more NO_HZ problems).
But i would suggest to wait next rc, it's going to be very
Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:22:38PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
any voices against basing trunk on latest upstream?
have an i386 working tree to commit.
should 2.6.20 first be copied to sid?
IMHO we should upload 2.6.20.4 to unstable,
10 matches
Mail list logo