On Fri, May 11, 2007 1:38, Frans Pop said:
The second was using an Etch netinst image, and there I can reliably
reproduce the hangs you are seeing. They seem to occur during the
unpacking of tarballs. At least, in both cases the last command that is
visible in the output of 'ps' is tar -xf -
This one time, at band camp, Simon A. Boggis said:
I've done my experiment with initramfs-tools - putting a 'sleep 10'
before mount_root makes my machine boot the kernel, as I suspected in my
original email:
# diff -u /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init{.orig,}
---
On Friday 11 May 2007 10:49, David Härdeman wrote:
Does dmesg show any interesting kernel messages after the installation
barfs? (like stack overflow warnings)
Nothing.
Dann suggested to try 'echo t /proc/sysrq-trigger'. After that dmesg
shows the attached dump.
tion+0x0/0xc
[c0120b4c]
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Simon A. Boggis said:
I've done my experiment with initramfs-tools - putting a 'sleep 10'
before mount_root makes my machine boot the kernel, as I suspected in my
original email:
# diff -u /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init{.orig,}
---
Hello Thomas,
* Thomas Köllmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2006-12-17 22:43 +0100]:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:07 -0800
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't remember anyone reporting problems with xorg on these
machines, it would be very valuable information if you could try it
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:05:27AM -0600, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
Hi Dann
The backported patch bugfix/ipv6-disallow-RH0-by-default.patch you
checked into the etch branch of the kernel causes the kernel to issue
the message, Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address
reassign 422255 linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
retitle 422255 [etch] Installing with root on JFS in LVM fails
severity 422255 important
thanks
On Friday 04 May 2007 16:27, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen wrote:
Guided LVM encryption where I change ext3 root filesystem to jfs.
The entire disk (5GB) is
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:18:26AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I'll revert for now and recommit when this is resolved.
hey Gordon,
Vlad Yasevich sent me a fix for this, and I've committed it in
r8571. Would you mind testing this to confirm it fixes your problem?
--
dann frazier
--
To
Hi Dann
On 5/11/07, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad Yasevich sent me a fix for this, and I've committed it in
r8571. Would you mind testing this to confirm it fixes your problem?
It does. The system now boots correctly.
Thanks!
Gordon
--
Gordon Farquharson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 2.6.20-3
When compiling software such as GNU Emacs, the compiler complains
when LINUX_VERSION_CODE is conditionalized with an #if directive:
In file included from ./config.h:979,
from dispnew.c:23:
./s/gnu-linux.h:49:24: error: operator '' has no
Sirs:
Your latest update package has what I consider a BUG!
Some of us have carefully-crafted /boot/grub/menu.lst files;
mine had 6 entries spread across multiple drives. To just
write over these files TWICE without asking or saving them to
another non-existing extension is WRONG!
Please fix
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.87b
Severity: normal
The file /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/ps3
has the following line:
if [ ${line} =! ${line#machine*PS3PF} ]; then
That should be
if [ ${line} != ${line#machine*PS3PF} ]; then
It's a
Scott Bell skrev:
When compiling software such as GNU Emacs, the compiler complains
when LINUX_VERSION_CODE is conditionalized with an #if directive:
Same problem with postfix. It FTBFS on an Etch system with a backport of
linux-libc-dev 2.6.20-3.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist
Instead of just sending a mail, I would suggest that next time you feel
there is an issue with a package, you file a bug report.
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 20:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your latest update package has what I consider a BUG!
Some of us have carefully-crafted /boot/grub/menu.lst
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:44:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sirs:
Your latest update package has what I consider a BUG!
Some of us have carefully-crafted /boot/grub/menu.lst files;
mine had 6 entries spread across multiple drives. To just
write over these files TWICE without asking
Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2007 08:33:43 +0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Probably memory error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
16 matches
Mail list logo
