On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:24:15PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
After that, will you be amiable to a linux-latest-2.6 upload for
2.6.21, or are there other things that should be fixed first?
Already scheduled.
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:20:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
It only fixes the symbol versions for powerpc. Currently it is not
possible to build modules against.
The s390 hypfs fix is in.
Bastian
--
Each kiss is as the first.
-- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, The Paradise
Hello,
now I see the following in /usr/include/linux/version.h:
#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132629
Should the bug be closed then?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 311357 + pending
Bug#311357: kernel-image-2.6.8-2: via-rhine fails to reserve I/O region, no
networking available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 317286 + pending
Bug#317286: Please backport support for Promise SATAII TX2/TX4 cards (from
2.6.11)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 15:27 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Right, but isn't it true that you need a non-relocatable kernel to
boot and a relocatable kernel to kexec (on x86)? In other words,
doesn't this require an additional kernel flavor?
If all you want to do is boot a new kernel directly from
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2
Dear Debian-Co-worker!
If I compile a new kernel with this version, I get a bunch of error-messages
at boot concerning ide_cd [1]. I still had a deb-package made with an older
version of this package, so I was able to test this one as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
#
tags 412740 pending
Bug#412740: linux-image-2.6-sparc64: please include config USB_SERIAL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 424022 pending
Bug#424022: gaim-guifications: please
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.21-3
Severity: important
Hardware:
Apple Mac Mini with a Radeon 9200 graphics card:
[lspci]
:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon
9200] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc
linux-2.6_2.6.21-4_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.21-4.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.21-4.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.21_2.6.21-4_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.21_2.6.21-4_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.21_2.6.21-4_all.deb
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.21-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.21-4.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.21-4.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.21-4.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.21_2.6.21-4_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.21_2.6.21-4_all.deb
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:00:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
After some minor fixes this builds, and the DRM drivers also
build again. I cannot test this since I do not have a machine with
PCI or these cards.
Removed your name in the comment, as that went out of fashion after
we started
As previously noted[1], a 2.6 kernel security update is pending for
sarge that changes the ABI. This update has now been NEW-processed,
and a DSA should be released soon. I've spoken with Frans, and the
plan is to do a spin of d-i ASAP as oldstable installs are
currently rather broken. This respin
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:00:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Martin Habets [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:24:40 +0100
Hi Kyle,
After some minor fixes this builds, and the DRM drivers also
build again. I cannot test this since I do not have a machine with
PCI or
I can't understand if we've to upgrade the firmware or downgrade it.
People are saying that they can make the stock kernel work with
version =6.61.
Then LSI say they are going to support just hardware with firmware
=6.62.
And while there was a perfectly working driver in sarge there is none
in
My knowledge of the DRM is weak, but as I understand it, the only time
it is used is by the ioctl handlers, and not by userspace. I've added
Dave Airlie to the CC list, hopefully he can enlighten us as to where
else cmpxchg is used.
Unless something %100 inside of the kernel will be the only
From: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 10:45:09 -0400
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:00:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
After some minor fixes this builds, and the DRM drivers also
build again. I cannot test this since I do not have a machine with
PCI or these cards.
From: Martin Habets [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 20:39:09 +0100
LOL, that was my initial approach until I saw Kyle's code.
Here's the patch I was preparing for that:
Even better would be to test if the platform has a real CMPXCHG
instruction since sparc32 is not the only platform
From: Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 21:32:10 +0100 (IST)
the DRM can use cmpxchg in userspace, to implement DRM_CAS, have a look in
drm git libdrm/xf86drm.h we appear to have a sparc implementation, this
gives us fast userspace locking, however if an arch doesn't
initramfs-tools_0.88_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.88.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.88.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.88_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.88.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.88.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.88.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.88.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.88_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.88_all.deb
Override entries for
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#395526: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.88
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#355881: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.88
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#355881: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.88
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#423469: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.88
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#387808: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.88
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#355881: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.88
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#423469: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.88
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 04:00:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 21:32:10 +0100 (IST)
the DRM can use cmpxchg in userspace, to implement DRM_CAS, have a look in
drm git libdrm/xf86drm.h we appear to have a sparc implementation, this
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:17:50 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
update_initramfs is already settable in /etc/i-t/update-initramfs-conf
So can we now agree on this? If 'update_initramfs = yes' in that config
file, then a package
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Meelis Roos wrote:
I do use my own daily kernels on PReP PPC machine but occassionally test
debian kernels to make sure debian is installabale here.
linux-image-2.6.21-1-prep mostly works here but can not boot
automatically. It can not find root since ROOT= empty.
tags 425136 moreinfo
stop
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Rafal Czlonka wrote:
Hi,
When updating the kernel, the mkinitramfs-kpkg is called and I get the
above message. Apart from that, everything seems OK.
hmmm never seen,
can you pleas post the output of
sh -x mkinitramfs-kpkg
thanks
--
maks
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 425136 moreinfo
Bug#425136: [: 42: ==: unexpected operator
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
From: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 19:41:34 -0400
I don't see what the problem is? If we can't do it in userspace, we fall
back to a heavyweight ioctl lock. This sounds sensible to me.
On parisc we implement userspace CAS with a lightweight syscall on our
gateway
maximilian attems wrote:
hmmm never seen,
can you pleas post the output of
sh -x mkinitramfs-kpkg
+ set -eu
+ STATEDIR=/var/lib/initramfs-tools
+ supported_host_version=
+ supported_target_version=
+ outfile=
+ getopt -o m:o: --long supported-host-version:,supported-target-version: -n
35 matches
Mail list logo
