Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686
Architecture: i386
Version: 2.6.22-6
/vmlinuz links are not updated. Situation is: machine has no kernel
installed.
# apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:10:48AM +0100, Olaf Zaplinski wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686
Architecture: i386
Version: 2.6.22-6
/vmlinuz links are not updated. Situation is: machine has no kernel
installed.
# apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
Setting up
I've a security patch for 2.6.18 that changes code that is also
changed by the vserver patch. Its pretty clear what both trees should
look like in the end, but I don't know of a way to generate them
cleanly in the build system.
The problem is that, when generating the vserver tree, the build
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:13:26AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Of course, I could go back and hack the vserver patch, or add a
fixup patch into 9-extra that reverts the security fix before it
applies the unmodified vserver patch, then reapply the security fix to
vserver in 17-extra. But, both
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
fixed 460569 6.7.1-2
Bug#460569: network configuration doesn't work outside of the nfs script
Bug marked as fixed in version 6.7.1-2.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
fixed 460569 6.7.1-2
thanks
Hmm, I have to correct myself.
It did not work when I reopened; and I did verify at the time that I did run
the correct version of gdb on my machine.
However, after yet another update, all seems fine now. I'm not sure what
exactly happened, but to me, this version of
Hello,
My colleague p3k3y and I first asked about this on #debian-kernel. waldi
suggested that we write a script to reproduce the problem and post it
here, so here we are.
First, a description of the symptoms.
Our setup consists of a tmpfs mount limited to 2GB with 5 million inodes
(the script
maximilian attems wrote:
[ kicked d-kernel cc, bug reports land anyway there ]
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:08:43AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
2.6.24rc6 has fared no better on my machine:
rc7 is out.
your report are still a bit bizarre as if some lines were
cut out, please try rc7 and
linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1_all.deb
This bug was discussed on LKML, the patch that apparently fixed the bug
is in this posting:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/29/44
The explanation of the bug is here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/29/26
This also explains why the 2.6.21 kernel did not have the same problem.
steven wilton
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1.dsc refers to
linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the
pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
11 matches
Mail list logo