Bug#461182: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686 not updating symlinks

2008-01-17 Thread Olaf Zaplinski
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686 Architecture: i386 Version: 2.6.22-6 /vmlinuz links are not updated. Situation is: machine has no kernel installed. # apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following

Bug#461182: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686 not updating symlinks

2008-01-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:10:48AM +0100, Olaf Zaplinski wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686 Architecture: i386 Version: 2.6.22-6 /vmlinuz links are not updated. Situation is: machine has no kernel installed. # apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686 Setting up

security patch/vserver conflict

2008-01-17 Thread dann frazier
I've a security patch for 2.6.18 that changes code that is also changed by the vserver patch. Its pretty clear what both trees should look like in the end, but I don't know of a way to generate them cleanly in the build system. The problem is that, when generating the vserver tree, the build

Re: security patch/vserver conflict

2008-01-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:13:26AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: Of course, I could go back and hack the vserver patch, or add a fixup patch into 9-extra that reverts the security fix before it applies the unmodified vserver patch, then reapply the security fix to vserver in 17-extra. But, both

Processed: Correction...

2008-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fixed 460569 6.7.1-2 Bug#460569: network configuration doesn't work outside of the nfs script Bug marked as fixed in version 6.7.1-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#460569: Correction...

2008-01-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
fixed 460569 6.7.1-2 thanks Hmm, I have to correct myself. It did not work when I reopened; and I did verify at the time that I did run the correct version of gdb on my machine. However, after yet another update, all seems fine now. I'm not sure what exactly happened, but to me, this version of

Memory consumption problem with tmps

2008-01-17 Thread Russ Brown
Hello, My colleague p3k3y and I first asked about this on #debian-kernel. waldi suggested that we write a script to reproduce the problem and post it here, so here we are. First, a description of the symptoms. Our setup consists of a tmpfs mount limited to 2GB with 5 million inodes (the script

Re: Bug#456273: Bug #456273

2008-01-17 Thread Paul Gear
maximilian attems wrote: [ kicked d-kernel cc, bug reports land anyway there ] On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:08:43AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote: 2.6.24rc6 has fared no better on my machine: rc7 is out. your report are still a bit bizarre as if some lines were cut out, please try rc7 and

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes

2008-01-17 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1.dsc linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1.diff.gz linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1_all.deb

Bug#425534: Kernel patch

2008-01-17 Thread Steven Wilton
This bug was discussed on LKML, the patch that apparently fixed the bug is in this posting: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/29/44 The explanation of the bug is here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/29/26 This also explains why the 2.6.21 kernel did not have the same problem. steven wilton

linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2008-01-17 Thread Debian Installer
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.1.dsc refers to linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,