On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:27:42 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This card used to work with previous kernels.
sorry for late reply.
could you test up to date kernels aka 2.6.25 or even better
2.6.26-rc8?
so that we can see if that bug still exists and upstream needs
to be
reassign 489223 linux-2.6 2.6.24-1
thansk
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 09:10:41AM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Traditional and expected Unix behavior is to give dnetc a small share of
the CPU and burnP6 should have a large share of the CPU. However here
is the CPU distribution according to top on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 489223 + pending
Bug#489223: kernel: niced processes get half of the CPU (problem with group
fair scheduling)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message,
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:05:28 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: linux-2.6: IPv6 PMTU table not garbage collected?
has caused the Debian Bug report #411839,
regarding linux-2.6: IPv6 PMTU table not garbage collected?
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:07:33 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#399165: linux-source-2.6.18: hostap_cs not talking to
Belkin F5D6020
has caused the Debian Bug report #399165,
regarding linux-source-2.6.18: hostap_cs not talking to Belkin F5D6020
to be
On 30 Jun 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I've remade grub as you suggested and that seems
to be OK.
Anthony
--
Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews,
and sceptical articles)
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, David Härdeman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:56:59PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
Look at that: (updating initrd, duplicates the content of the cryptroot
config file...)
right cryptsetup should maybe not write into /etc/i-t/conf.d
but in /usr/share/i-t/conf.d
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-vserver-686
Version: 2.6.25-6~bpo40+1
Severity: important
Hello,
It looks like ipv6 is disabled in the vserver flavour of
linux-image-2.6.25-2.
I don't understand why it is, I can't find any information in the
changelog of the debian package, nor in the changelog
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 01:43:28PM +0200, kaouete wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-vserver-686
Version: 2.6.25-6~bpo40+1
Severity: important
Hello,
It looks like ipv6 is disabled in the vserver flavour of
linux-image-2.6.25-2.
I don't understand why it is, I can't find any
I'm sorry I forgot to update this thread.
There is no problem in the kernel, this bug must be closed.
The problem was that I was using the default xorg config file and that file
didn't had an entry for the synaptic driver. As soon as I modified the
xorg.conf and added the synaptic driver
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:31:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
afair vserver needed a special ipv6 patch.
I don't think the special ipv6 patch is for ipv6 in host, but for
ipv6 in guests !
And this is why ipv6 should be enabled in the kernel.
Anyway, ipv6 was enabled in 2.6.22 with
Hi, it is not the sky2, it's an RTL-8169.
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:36:58PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
please checkout current 2.6.25 unstable linux images
or even better 2.6.26-rc8 trunk snapshots see apt lines
- http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
and report back on those, if still
also sprach maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.05.0044 +0200]:
I would suggest to rename the hooks as follows and call the new
hook mount.
top - init mount - top new - mount
not sure if i'd like to play a renaming game,
Why not? It's for debugging purposes and thus not
also sprach maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.05.0054 +0200]:
initramfs runs executable scripts in scripts/*/* at various stages.
Albeit an error by the user or the package, scripts without
executable permissions get copied to the initrd by the hooks, but
then they don't get
Twas brillig at 23:55:16 05.07.2008 UTC+07 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and
gimble:
MG This behavior is repeatable even with BROADCAST flag on the
MG interface (actually running tcpdump is critical due to some
MG reason).
Oops, please ignore this :) Why did I think about BROADCAST?
--
Twas brillig at 16:14:58 05.07.2008 UTC+01 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and
gimble:
JD Sure -- I'm CCing debian-arm incase someone there has a n2100
JD running one of those kernels already -- it will take me days to
JD build it :)
JD Can someone verify that the rtl 8169 multicast bug is
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 22:24:21 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#484565:
/lib/modules/2.6.24-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse.ko: Patch to
enable Dell 1420 touch pad's scroll is not working
has caused the Debian Bug report #484565,
regarding
also sprach maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.05.2228 +0200]:
hmmm?
that is an script.
yes, but unlike e.g. scripts/local-top scripts, it's a hook script.
why should a user be bothered if a maintainer fucks up the installation?
because the system may be left unbootable?
--
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 06:33:00PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.05.0054 +0200]:
initramfs runs executable scripts in scripts/*/* at various stages.
Albeit an error by the user or the package, scripts without
executable permissions
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:51:41PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Victor NOEL wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:31:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
afair vserver needed a special ipv6 patch.
I don't think the special ipv6 patch is for ipv6 in host, but
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Victor NOEL wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:31:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
afair vserver needed a special ipv6 patch.
I don't think the special ipv6 patch is for ipv6 in host, but for
ipv6 in guests !
And this is why ipv6 should be enabled in the
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:44:27PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.05.2228 +0200]:
hmmm?
that is an script.
yes, but unlike e.g. scripts/local-top scripts, it's a hook script.
okay for the boot scripts the same rules apply then for
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-6
Severity: normal
pciehp stopped working after upgrading to 2.6.25.
(note that the nvidia kernel module was only loaded _after_ the problem
occured so the kernel was not tainted)
to my knowledge, the bc4328 device was never pci-hotplugged
23 matches
Mail list logo
