Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.11
Severity: important
Announcment:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1215135788.14590.598.camel%40debian.sh.intel.comforum_name=ipw3945-devel
Download:
Debian Bug Tracking System scrisse in data 03/07/2008 16:30:
[...]
that mm trouble has been fixed in newer linux images. etch + half kernel
have the upstream fix. as the oops is quite rare and fix hasn't been
clearly identified it is recommeded to upgrade to etch + half kernel
-
The problem is that the vmlinuz file in /boot and modules in
/lib/modules do not carry debug symbols. Therefor the vmlinux
and unstripped modules would be needed in a linux-debug-2.6.x-x-all
package carrying these would be nice. See the following discussion
about systemtap for example:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
severity 489684 normal
Bug#489684: firmware-iwlwifi: new firmware iwl4965 (228.57.1.21) available
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 09:07:10AM +0200, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
Bumping to important because I have reports from different people about
better stability when switching ssids and improved data rates (from 50
kbit/s to 2mbyte/s!)
The firmware changes the ABI and is not yet referenced in Linus'
Bastian Blank schrieb am Montag, 07. Juli 2008 um 10:33:01 +0200:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 09:07:10AM +0200, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
Bumping to important because I have reports from different people about
better stability when switching ssids and improved data rates (from 50
kbit/s to
Bastian Blank schrieb am Montag, 07. Juli 2008 um 10:33:01 +0200:
The firmware changes the ABI and is not yet referenced in Linus' tree.
Follow-up for ABI Ver.2: Both versions should be installed. the
appropriate version is chosen, since there are different files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ll
firmware-nonfree_0.12_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.12.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.12.tar.gz
firmware-bnx2_0.12_all.deb
firmware-iwlwifi_0.12_all.deb
firmware-qlogic_0.12_all.deb
firmware-ralink_0.12_all.deb
Greetings,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 489684 + pending
Bug#489684: firmware-iwlwifi: new firmware iwl4965 (228.57.1.21) available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
firmware-iwlwifi_0.12_all.deb: package says section is non-free/admin, override
says non-free/misc.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is
Accepted:
firmware-bnx2_0.12_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.12_all.deb
firmware-iwlwifi_0.12_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_0.12_all.deb
firmware-nonfree_0.12.dsc
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-nonfree_0.12.dsc
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#489684: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #489684,
regarding firmware-iwlwifi: new firmware iwl4965 (228.57.1.21) available
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 471892 -1
Bug#471892: r8169 does not load properly in 2.6.24 kernel
Bug 471892 cloned as bug 489710.
reassign -1 linux-2.6.24
Bug#489710: r8169 does not load properly in 2.6.24 kernel
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.24-1-686-bigmem'
clone 471892 -1
reassign -1 linux-2.6.24
tags -1 - pending
tags -1 patch
thanks
Cloning to 2.6.24 as it is likely affected and this may be worth fixing in
an update of that kernel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
reassign 471892 linux-2.6 2.6.24-1
Bug#471892: r8169 does not load properly in 2.6.24 kernel
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.24-1-686-bigmem' to `linux-2.6'.
reassign
initramfs-tools_0.92e_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.92e.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.92e.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.92e_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi. I have some question to the new kernel 2.6.25-2-686 from etch-backports. I
downloaded this and try to install. After reboot my computer, i want to install
a standart Nvidia driver, but the installation was aborted with errormassage
that the driver don't support a Xen compiled kernel.
I
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.92e.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92e.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.92e.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92e.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.92e_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92e_all.deb
Override entries
As a workaround for this if you want the kernel symbols for OProfile,
you can use this script instead of opreport:
http://marc.info/?l=oprofile-listm=121514749918466q=p3
It fetches kernel symbol information from /proc/kallsyms and lists
them in a format identical to what opreport -l uses.
(adding d-kernel and d-release)
On Monday 07 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2,
linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5
Please wait few more days
Package: firmware-bnx2
Version: 0.11~bpo40+1
Severity: important
When the root filesystem is encrypted via LUKS, the init scripts wait for the
passphrase, and at that time, the root filesystem is not available. The
bnx2 module tries to load the firmware from the disk and fails after a long
Frans Pop a écrit :
Se IMO we should take a real good look at .25 and .26 and check what's
new, what's important for Lenny and what's risky, and maybe check if some
things we do want could be backported.
As the release team is Cc:ed, I just want to make sure it is aware that
switching to
Your message dated Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:30:17 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#489758: firmware-bnx2: bnx2 module fails to load bnx2
firmware file when the root FS is encrypted
has caused the Debian Bug report #489758,
regarding firmware-bnx2: bnx2 module fails to
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:19:01PM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Se IMO we should take a real good look at .25 and .26 and check what's
new, what's important for Lenny and what's risky, and maybe check if some
things we do want could be backported.
As the release
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080707 19:48]:
Changing kernel at this point of the release would be too destructive,
so unless there is a big fat problem in the .25 that the .26 should fix
and is unbackportable (does such a beast even exist ?) I'm rather
opposed to it. Note that the
The upstream Xen tree has a patch more like the attached.
However I suspect there is no practical difference between the two so
I'd suggest applying Göran Weinholt's patch since it has actually been
tested. I will check it in shortly unless I hear screaming...
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
The only
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:30:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
(adding d-kernel and d-release)
On Monday 07 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2,
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-07 17:30]:
In fact, having 2.6.25 in testing would possibly make it easier for
the kernel team to do a final (?) 2.6.25 upload with latest stable
updates.
FWIW, I fully agree. In the past, we never waited for all arches in
d-i to move to a new kernel
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.26 is the release kernel.
so i'm happy with push on it.
.25 is a possible backup.
I'd like to get an official statement from RM team about that so we
can move it further.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-07 17:30]:
In fact, having 2.6.25 in testing would possibly make it easier for
the kernel team to do a final (?) 2.6.25 upload with latest stable
updates.
FWIW, I
On Monday 07 July 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
There are valid arguments to be found for staying with 2.6.25 a bit
longer, but D-I has not yet converted to it is NOT one of them.
testing users are currently on an unsupported kernel.
Eh, how does that follow my last para which I assume you
Package: linux-source-2.6.25
Version: 2.6.25-6
Followup-For: Bug #484594
Sorry, I didn't seem to get the reply to this... Doesn't the BTS
automatically respond to the submitter without a CC: needing to be
set?
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 02:17:31PM +1000, Tim Connors wrote:
2.6.25 is very slow to
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-07 17:30]:
In fact, having 2.6.25 in testing would possibly make it easier for
the kernel team to do a final (?) 2.6.25 upload with latest stable
updates.
FWIW, I fully agree. In the
On Monday 07 July 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
.26 also includes at least one change I know of that is somewhat risky:
PAT support for x86 (which could be disabled).
#d-uk just gave me this tidbit:
... am I missing something or will the move to .26, with libata binding
before most of the IDE stuff,
34 matches
Mail list logo
