I compile my 2.6.25.1 kernel with the following options:
$ time fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version -rarqos --revision 01
kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source
After I try to install it on a second machine I get the following error message:
rarqos:~# dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.25.1-rarqos_01
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 504167 2.6.26-8
Bug#504167: linux-2.6 - regression: fails to unblank on resume
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.26-8.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 504167 2.6.26-8
Bug#504167: linux-2.6 - regression: fails to unblank on resume
Bug no longer marked as found in version 2.6.26-8.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 02:04:59PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > can you please try out 2.6.26-rc8, see trunk apt lines
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
>
> Will do, as soon as it creeps into sid.
>
> > it should have newer ath5k driver.
>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:03:54PM +1200, Steven Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unable to install Debian 4.0r3 as there is a lock up during hardware
> detection, would seem to be around the raid module.
>
> Installed 3.1 which went fine, upgraded to 4.0r3 using apt-get update ;
> apt-get -y dist-upgrad
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:13:33PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:01:43PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > > there was no patch provided nor any proof of any trouble by your
> > > side, so tagging with moreinfo and
Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:13:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: time runs too slow
has caused the Debian Bug report #433640,
regarding linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: time runs too slow
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
> > When using this kernel, the time of the system runs too slow. Minutes to
> > slow in a couple of hours. This also confuses the ntp daemon.
>
> Is this issue still reproducible with the current Lenny kernel?
can be closed
thanks
Folkert van Heusden
--
Multi tail barnamaj mowahib li mora9aba
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:43:39PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.22-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> When using this kernel, the time of the system runs too slow. Minutes to
> slow in a couple of hours. This also confuses the ntp daemon.
Is this
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:31:04PM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:09:00AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6695
>>
>> 2.6.26 is in lenny/sid - can someone test it to confirm?
>
> 2.6.26-1-686 from lenny boots m
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:30:05 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:04:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I tried linux-image-2.6.24-rc6-amd64 (version
> > 2.6.24~rc6-1~experimental.1~snapshot.10007) from trunk, but I still
> > experience this bug:
> >
> > $ ls -altrF /s
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:45:15PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 05:34:07PM +0100, Mark Hobley wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-486
> > Version: 2.6.26-5
> > Severity: important
> >
> >
> > As Debian is upgraded from Debian Etch to Debian Lenny, the kernel may
> >
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Kolargol double zero wrote:
>
> > If you're running Etch, could you try to reproduce this bug
> > with the 2.6.24 based kernel added in 4.0r4?
>
> Thanks for your suggestion Moritz.
>
> I've tried that by installing packages linux-image-2.6-sparc64-etchn
Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:07:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Panic on G4 Pegasos II
has caused the Debian Bug report #432142,
regarding Panic on G4 Pegasos II
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
> If you're running Etch, could you try to reproduce this bug
> with the 2.6.24 based kernel added in 4.0r4?
Thanks for your suggestion Moritz.
I've tried that by installing packages linux-image-2.6-sparc64-etchnhalf
(version 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1) and linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-sparc64
(v
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92l
Severity: important
A lot of the environment is leaked into into creating problems in other init
scripts. I'm not sure whether the severity is right, but some other init
scripts do not work as expected because of some of the environment they
inherit.
Here's
Hi,
I've encountered the exact same bug, but I could circumvent the issue by
removing the need to load bnx2 in the initrd:
remove bnx2 from /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
update-initramfs -u
Now it works, but loading bnx2 in the initrd still fails.
Regards,
Bjoern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-8
Severity: normal
B is limited to >= 1.10.23 (B of 2.6.26-10 is
the same, at time of bugreporting). Build against 11.001-0.1 (I know,
that was the highest version in (local) repo at build time) FTBFS --
buildlog[*] in attach. Build against 11.0011 (current in
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-10
Followup-For: Bug #504167
Reporting this issue is also confirmed with 2.6.26-10.
Mark
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'ex
19 matches
Mail list logo
