Your message dated Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:58:34 +0100
with message-id 20090227075834.ge3...@baikonur.stro.at
and subject line Re: Bug#517236: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: Post Inst fails -
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs
has caused the Debian Bug report #517236,
regarding linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: Post Inst
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 513604 516814 517329
Bug#513604: linux-libc-dev: drm headers conflict with libdrm-dev
Bug#516814: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with libdrm-dev
Bug#517329: linux-libc-dev: file conflict with libdrm-dev
Forcibly Merged 513604 516814 517329.
Hello, d-kernel people,
You are tracking the kernel packaging with SVN. Do you just import
snapshots/tarballs and maintain your changes across them, or do you
have some funky setup that allows you to keep an SVN repo in sync
with a Git upstream?
This is a serious question, not flame bait or
Nikolay A. Panov debian-bugrep...@niksite.ru writes:
I cannot install linux-header-2.6.18-1-amd64 package sice it depends
on linux-kbuild-2.6.28 package which is not in repository.
Any hope of getting this fixed? I'd really like to build a few modules
for this kernel.
Bjørn
--
I couldn't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package initramfs-tools
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: initramfs-tools
tags 468115 + patch
Bug#468115: Support for mount failure hooks.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
It seems to me that the versioned replaces used in linux-libc-dev is too
restrictive; even libdrm-dev 2.4.4+git+20090205+8b88036-1.
Forcing an overwrite indicates that the following files conflicts:
dpkg - warning, overriding problem because --force enabled:
trying to overwrite
Package: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686
Version: 2.6.28-1
Severity: normal
I think i had the same bug in versions before this, but then the trace
wasn't shown just SKB BUG: Invalid truesize.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.28-1-686 (Debian 2.6.28-1) (m...@debian.org) (gcc
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:18:12AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Hello, d-kernel people,
hey Martni,
You are tracking the kernel packaging with SVN. Do you just import
snapshots/tarballs and maintain your changes across them, or do you
have some funky setup that allows you to keep an SVN
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #497392
# * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11998
# * remote status
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-13
Severity: important
Tags: patch
* ISSUE
Lenny's kernel is subject to the bug described here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/11/70
* ANALYSIS FIX
and fixed with this thread:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/15/107
(in particular with
Hi,
most probably you simply do not have a hardware rng. I have an S3210SH,
http://download.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/s3200sh/sb/e14960007_s3210sh_tps_r1_7.pdf,
and reading that pdf I thought for hours that I have one. However,
what it
really says is that the BMC chip has one. I was
Package: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686
Version: 2.6.28-1
Severity: important
New 2.6.28 fails to boot as it finds no md0 (for root dev). mdadm
complains it is unable to assemble it. With the provided shell it is
clear sd[ab]* devices are missing at the point of boot sequence.
OTOH, /sys/bus/scsi/
only today (after some good amount of beer) I've detected that slow-down
is not present when programs are ran not within VNC (like in the case
when it was during original filing, vnc was vnc4server
4.1.1+X4.3.0-32 rebuilt locally with nostrip).
So, slow-down is not present when the same command
13 matches
Mail list logo
