2.6.30 source into testing?

2009-07-02 Thread John Talbut
Is there any chance of linux-source 2.6.30 migrating to testing any time soon? John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#535440: [REGRESSION] 2.6.30 fails to boot [amd64]

2009-07-02 Thread Nicolas DEGAND
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.30-1 Severity: critical This kernel fails to boot on my computer.. I have a whole screen of backtrace info. It is not saved in the syslog. I wrote down some of the lines. [ 6.230405] [8023411b]?

Bug#404927: Adaptec aacraid still w/ broken permissions on lenny

2009-07-02 Thread Philipp Niemann
Hi, this bug to me is still applying to several systems I installed recently (using debian lenny 5.0.2). Please see the details for one of the systems below. I would like to see this bug fixed. Besides the obvious security issue the floppy group imposes this bug triggers misbehaviour for the fai

Processed: severity of 535440 is important

2009-07-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 535440 important Bug#535440: [REGRESSION] 2.6.30 fails to boot [amd64] Severity set to `important' from `critical' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Re: [kernel] r13859 - dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/linux

2009-07-02 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009, dann frazier wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:26:00AM +, Maximilian Attems wrote: Author: maks Date: Wed Jul 1 09:25:58 2009 New Revision: 13859 Log: revert wording of firmware-linux wow... just reverting w/o discussing w/ the committer? That's a bit

Re: 2.6.30 source into testing?

2009-07-02 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:40:45AM +0100, John Talbut wrote: Is there any chance of linux-source 2.6.30 migrating to testing any time soon? hasn't build yet for alpha and hppa, that will get fixed on next upload. have worked with upstream on alpha fix and hppa is a matter of disabling some

Bug#517108: base: Couldn't get CPU usage for each process

2009-07-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
I do not know what might cause this bug. However, the following might help to diagnose and fix the problem: 1. Boot with notsc added to the kernel command line 2. Boot from a live CD or rescue CD In each of these cases, please run cat /proc/1/stat to get CPU usage information and then send the

Processed: tagging 517108

2009-07-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 tags 517108 moreinfo Bug#517108: base: Couldn't get CPU usage for each process There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#535331: possible reason

2009-07-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Looking at differencies, there seems to be key differente between etch's 2.6.18 and 2.6.24 kernels' postinst scripts. the variable $loader gets initialized to lilo in 2.6.18, and to empty value in 2.6.24. I don't see any way to (preferrably) autodetect or configure this variable according to

Bug#433905: Dear ugent.be Email Account User

2009-07-02 Thread Web Upgrade Service
Dear Email Account User, This message is from the Database Information Technology service messaging center, to all our e-mail account holders. All Web Account will undergo regularly scheduled maintenance. Access to your mailbox via our mail portal will be unavailable for some period of time

Bug#523735: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: please consider supporting the experimental kernel-package out of the box

2009-07-02 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi all, I've CC'd Manoj on this, since I am proposing a change in kernel-package to solve this bug. [Summary: Kernel package stopped running update-initramfs, but the initramfs-tools postinst hook specifically doesn't run for kernel-package built kernels] 7c7,10 [ -z $2 ] || exit 0

Bug#523735: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: please consider supporting the experimental kernel-package out of the box

2009-07-02 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, Jul 02 2009, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi all, I've CC'd Manoj on this, since I am proposing a change in kernel-package to solve this bug. [Summary: Kernel package stopped running update-initramfs, but the initramfs-tools postinst hook specifically doesn't run for kernel-package

What is Fulfilflemnt

2009-07-02 Thread warhorses
Whaat is Fulfillmennt www. gen65. net. Gqay men, straight owmen share brain detail: report -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#523735: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: please consider supporting the experimental kernel-package out of the box

2009-07-02 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes: On Thu, Jul 02 2009, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: Hi all, I've CC'd Manoj on this, since I am proposing a change in kernel-package to solve this bug. [Summary: Kernel package stopped running update-initramfs, but the initramfs-tools postinst hook