I just noticed this bug report, and couldn't let be commenting...
I believe buried in ddp.c is a little unprecise. ddp.c implements the
EtherTalk Link Access Protocol (ELAP). See the header of
net/appletalk/ddp.c:
* DDP:An implementation of the AppleTalk DDP protocol for
*
Am 01.12.2009 um 13:14 schrieb Bjørn Mork:
I just noticed this bug report, and couldn't let be commenting...
I believe buried in ddp.c is a little unprecise.
I didn't look myself yet, just repeated what Didier wrote. Sorry for
that.
ddp.c implements the
EtherTalk Link Access
Package: linux-2.6
Version:
2.6.31-2
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The kernel freezes, it is even impossible to switch to the console,
when using the Xserver packages for radeon / ati
It may be a bug of the X server, but Brice Goglin
Patrik Schindler p...@pocnet.net writes:
Good point. But Token Ring Card drivers already exist, even if there
is likely not a very much bigger demand. :-)
Well, they do exist but they are probably going away too. I don't see
anyone really interested in hacking on them, so they are staying
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-2
Severity: normal
With respect to bug 552324, Brice Goglin brice.gog...@ens-lyon.org suggests
that it may be a bug in the kernel
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552324#10
When switching to graphics mode (for example when starting Gnome)
Is installing grub-pc the proper solution to this problem.
I'm having similar failed with status 1 error as described in the bug.
I just want to make sure installing grub-pc won't cause more problems.
Thanks,
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
forcemerge 559049 559041
Bug#559049: linux-image-2.6.31-1-686: freezes in connection with
xserver-xorg-video-ati / xserver-xorg-video-radeon
Bug#559041: Subject:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-20
Severity: important
Tags: lenny
This change from upstream simply adds a new pci id (well, and revs the
module version - I'll probably use 0.06lenny1 instead of 1.0 though).
Author: David Altobelli david.altobe...@hp.com
Date: Fri Feb 27 14:03:09 2009 -0800
On Monday 30 November 2009 09:23:48 pm kay wrote:
Debian Lenny freezes for about 10-15 minutes, and I can not log in via SSH.
Hello! How did you obtain this log ?
Can you try to use netconsole to catch a whole kernel log?
uname -a
Linux dc 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 03:06:00 UTC
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 559064 + pending
Bug #559064 [linux-2.6] new pciid for hpilo
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:41:45 -0700
with message-id 20091201174145.gb14...@lackof.org
and subject line fixed in 2.6.29-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #559064,
regarding new pciid for hpilo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1.1.dsc
redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1.1.diff.gz
cman_2.20081102-1.1_i386.deb
libcman2_2.20081102-1.1_i386.deb
libcman-dev_2.20081102-1.1_i386.deb
Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
Severity: minor
Hi,
A newcommer to Debian, forgive me if I do any mistakes, I'm trying to
compile broadcom-sta following http://wiki.debian.org/wl wiki page.
While installing linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64, I noticed that it depends on
gcc-4.1, but when I
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:59PM +0530, Mohan R wrote:
Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
Severity: minor
Hi,
A newcommer to Debian, forgive me if I do any mistakes, I'm trying to
compile broadcom-sta following http://wiki.debian.org/wl wiki page.
While installing
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:32:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 12:42 +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
...
I'm running 2.6.32-rc7 with this patch applied and
CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=y
That works as desired for my non-removable case. Is it desired that I
test if
redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1+lenny1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1+lenny1.dsc
redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1+lenny1.diff.gz
cman_2.20081102-1+lenny1_i386.deb
libcman2_2.20081102-1+lenny1_i386.deb
Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:38:20 +0100
with message-id 20091201223820.ga4...@galadriel.inutil.org
and subject line Re: [firmware-iwlwifi] Wifi connection error after some minutes
has caused the Debian Bug report #548749,
regarding [firmware-iwlwifi] Wifi connection error after some
On Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:20 AM
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
I received a bug report http://bugs.debian.org/558426 that
shows atl1e corrupting IPv6 packets. I have reproduced this
on an Eee PC 901 and found that it is linked to TSO. The
most obvious thing wrong with
From: Jie Yang jie.y...@atheros.com
For hardware limit to support TSOV6, just disable this feature
Signed-off-by: Jie Yang jie.y...@atheros.com
---
drivers/net/atl1e/atl1e_main.c | 36
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 558426 + pending
Bug #558426 [linux-image-2.6-686] atl1e performance problems with native IPv6
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64'
Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64'
severity 559069 wishlist
Bug #559069
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 559069 linux-2.6
Bug #559069 [linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64] linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why
gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64' to 'linux-2.6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:26:21 -0700
with message-id 20091202062621.gc21...@lackof.org
and subject line fixed in 2.6.28-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #559069,
regarding linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
severity 559069 wishlist
thanks
dann frazier wrote:
As far as Debian is concerned, its not a bug to use a compiler still
available in the distribution. It can be a wishlist bug if a package
doesn't work w/ a newer compiler, but it won't be a candidate for a
reassign 559069 linux-2.6
thanks
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:46:15AM +0530, Mohan R wrote:
package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
severity 559069 wishlist
thanks
dann frazier wrote:
As far as Debian is concerned, its not a bug to use a compiler still
available in the distribution. It can be a
25 matches
Mail list logo
