Am Donnerstag, 8. April 2010 21:06:02 schrieb maximilian attems:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:06:01PM +0200, Achim Schaefer wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 8. April 2010 01:02:30 schrieb maximilian attems:
as your kernel is heavily tainted this voids your support,
Not sure I understand this.
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-11
Severity: normal
┌───┤ Configuring linux-base ├───┐
││
│ These configuration files will be updated: │
│
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 06:49:17PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
indeed those two are not related, beside beeing closed by the same
upload.
There is long list of bug numbers in that message, but this only
included in the subject. It is confusing.
562847 is closed by
* update-initramfs:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# not relevant for stable
tags 561203 + squeeze sid
Bug #561203 [linux-2.6] threads and fork on machine with VIPT-WB cache
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
tags 568307 + squeeze sid
Bug #568307 [gnustep-back-common] Generates incomplete nfont
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 02:26 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
[...]
Here is /etc/fstab before:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# file system mount pointtype options
dump pass
proc/proc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 577047 moreinfo
Bug #577047 [linux-base] device ids will be changed as follows: (blank)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Just a FYI for those noticing this bug report: There are excellent
instructions on how to build a linux-kbuild-2.6.33 package yourself on
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage#Thestoryoflinux-kbuild-2.6
Something like the attached hack is necessary due to changes in
Hi,
which files did it want to update?
I can only guess that you are thinking of the slightly unclear package
upgrade situation.
The skipped lines ([...]) only contained the notification about
automatically installed packages (The following packages were
automatically installed and are no
Hi Manoj, hi kernel team.
May I suggest to put that manpage in the new linux-base package (and
removing it from kernel-package)?
In kernel-package generated kernel images would just have to depend on
linux-base,... and so we could be sure, that everybody has that manpage.
btw: Isn't that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 577054 linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
Bug #577054 [acpi] acpi: After upgrade, computer does not turn off
Bug reassigned from package 'acpi' to 'linux-image-2.6.32-3-686'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions acpi/1.4-2.
thanks
Stopping
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:44:57PM +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hi Manoj, hi kernel team.
May I suggest to put that manpage in the new linux-base package (and
removing it from kernel-package)?
In kernel-package generated kernel images would just have to depend on
linux-base,...
Hi Ben.
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
change in the official kernel packages, which has no bearing on custom
configurations.
What about adding a linux-common package? Ok... is probably annyoing ;)
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 06:49:17PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
indeed those two are not related, beside beeing closed by the same
upload.
There is long list of bug numbers in that message, but this only
included in the subject. It is
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
I installed linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64 (version 2.6.32-11) and
found that it has the same problem. It worked more than one round the
clock but then it became spams. Now I wrote this mail from this
kernel and can do any experiments if You
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:55:38PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
change in the official kernel packages, which has no bearing on custom
configurations.
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 13:57 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
So this is a hardware fault, isn't it?
Nope,... unfortunately not,... going back to e.g. the default kernel and
everything's fine :-/
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Am Freitag, 9. April 2010 15:44:02 schrieb maximilian attems:
please notify upstream:
bugzilla.openvz.org
and set the forwarded to aboves bug report, thanks.
I think it is bug 1461
http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
But I don know how to set this.
Achim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 569034 + pending
Bug #569034 {Done: maximilian attems m...@debian.org} [src:linux-2.6]
linux-2.6: Please support sh4 architecture
Ignoring request to alter tags of
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
Severity: normal
Hi! Is it possible to enable FB_I810_GTF and FB_I810_I2C in the default kernel?
This is necessary to use it on the Samsung SMT-7020S settop-box. So it would be
possible to write the I2C-Bus to set the resolution of its TV-out chip.
-- System
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:24:23AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Right. And it is generally able to convert references to CD drives.
Please send the contents of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules and
the output of 'ls -l /dev/disk/by-id'.
anth...@feynman:~$ cat
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Achim Schaefer wrote:
No I use nouveau since a long time.
I assume you mixed another bug report up with mine.
sorry, indeed.
costumers.:)
You wrote bugzilla.kernel.org not openvz.org-)
let us know bug nr so that we can track it.
Someone solved this bug between -10
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 11:52 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
[...]
However, the change that breaks the kernel for me is in these options,
there is no other difference.
I keep telling you that we are following the default. Apparently that
value doesn't work for your hardware.
The physical align
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 19:05 +0200, jeanseb wrote:
Hi
here are the config file
the *-defconfig boot, the *-debian crash just at first second.
You need to report a separate bug instead of adding to this one. It is
confused enough already, and your working config has
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 16:31 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 13:57 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
So this is a hardware fault, isn't it?
Nope,... unfortunately not,... going back to e.g. the default kernel and
everything's fine :-/
I thought you said
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:54 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:55:38PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
change in the official
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 12:24 +0200, Rainer Schwarzbach wrote:
[...]
But I think the problem here really is a bug in the postinst script of
linux-base:
Setting up linux-base (2.6.32-11) ...
Undefined subroutine DebianKernel::DiskId::_system called at
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 12:41 -0400, micah anderson wrote:
On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 11:52 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-8~bpo50+1
Severity: important
I'm running a tor exit node on a kvm instance,
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 14:26 +0200, Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-9
Severity: normal
File: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-amd64
I reported the following bug against fglrx-driver
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554847
(fglrx driver
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 563313 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667
Bug #563313 [linux-2.6] lm-sensors: sensors not working after suspend
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667'.
thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 563313 + pending
Bug #563313 [linux-2.6] lm-sensors: sensors not working after suspend
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
From: Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de
commit dadf28a10c3eb29421837a2e413ab869ebd upstream
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
[bwh: Backport to 2.6.32; same applies to
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:48:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 12:41 -0400, micah anderson wrote:
On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 11:52 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64
Version:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
looks like i missed a few things on implementing BOOTIF support properly.
somehow i managed to get the order of the mac address backwards. i know i
tested it many times, but somehow the patch i submitted got it backwards:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 577149 pending
Bug #577149 [initramfs-tools] configure_networking: pxelinux BOOTIF fixes
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:22:47PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
could you please review belows patch.
if you see no objection, I'd just merge it.
i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (after adjusting slightly
for newer version). seems to work fine with 0.94.4.
i'd probably
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 02:32:43AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
the configure_networking function relies on DEVICE being set, and
conf/initramfs.conf hard-codes this to eth0. though some scripts may call
this
from /scripts/local-top, and
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
with these patchese applied, it seems to work. at least for the moment.
thank you, applied and pushed out! :)
also documented in initramfs-tools.8
happy hacking
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:22:47PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
could you please review belows patch.
if you see no objection, I'd just merge it.
i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (after adjusting slightly
for newer
38 matches
Mail list logo
