Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
past)
I downloaded the latest nvidia graphic card driver 195.xx.xx.
However, linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 can not load nvidia.ko generated after
running
nvidia-195.xx.xx.run
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:33:43 +0200
with message-id 20100623093343.ga19...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
and subject line Re: Bug#586886: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: can not load
nvidia.ko nor nv.ko
has caused the Debian Bug report #586886,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: can not load
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi
there is a problem with qcserial since ... 2.6.32 I think - there is currently
a regression bug. Seems like there was a change in the fifo
the new method doesn't handle frmware uploads well
There is a patch
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:44:03PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi
there is a problem with qcserial since ... 2.6.32 I think - there is
currently a regression bug. Seems like there was a change in the fifo
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:55:38 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
Stephen Powell recently reminded the kernel team that LILO is not
automatically updated on installation of a new kernel version in lenny.
In fact there is a general problem that there are several different ways
a boot loader may
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:12:42AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:55:38 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
In case 1, the boot loader should also be called by update-initramfs
when it is called outside of kernel package installation and removal.
This is normally
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:04:06 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
yaird is no longer present in testing or unstable, so it is a non-issue
as far as I'm concerned.
I see it is gone from testing, but it is still present in unstable, as of
this moment, according to the Debian web site.
--
It doesn't seem to work on 2.6.34. See attachment.
I had no problems on 2.6.32-5 yet.
Regards,
Pitxyoki
rndis_wlan - 2.6.34-1 (without rndis_host patch)
Description: Binary data
Bonjour
Je vous invite à consulter l'article :
http://comfortplusmaroc.blog4ever.com/blog/lire-article-34561-94856-programme_marrakech_03_nuits__04_jours.html
Bienvenue à Marrakech
Ibtissam DERRAZ
Assistante de direction
COMFORT PLUS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Thank you very much.
_
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:40 +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote:
My problem seems related to those in Ubuntu report #55
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/55. If I
unload the 3c59x module, I can no longer reproduce this problem, and
wireless is stable.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:20:59AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:04:06 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
yaird is no longer present in testing or unstable, so it is a non-issue
as far as I'm concerned.
I see it is gone from testing, but it is still present in
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:12:42AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
That does seem like a more general-purpose solution, rather than having
lilo and zipl treated as special cases. But please keep the appropriate
parties informed of any future design changes to update-initramfs.
I myself have never
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 11:08 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
could you please provide output of:
dd if=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.33 bs=1 count=8 | od
Attached.
I'm not sure whether file catches lzma at all (dd/od won't help
either, but we're investigating our possibilities).
Argl.. yeah I
ahh... I've just seen that this issue in libmagic has already been
reported (#576950), actually by myself ^^, and there seems to be a
solution,...
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 574555 - moreinfo patch
Bug #574555 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64: 2.6.32 kernel oops: Pid:
1700, comm: irq/21-b43 Not tainted 2.6.32-3-amd64
Removed tag(s) moreinfo and patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
submitter 586967 Arne Nordmark nordm...@mech.kth.se
Bug #586967 [linux-2.6] BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101
Changed Bug submitter to 'Arne Nordmark nordm...@mech.kth.se' from 'Ben
Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk'
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 586967 + pending
Bug #586967 [linux-2.6] BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Forwarded Message
From: Arne Nordmark nordm...@mech.kth.se
To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Cc: 574...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#574555: BUG: scheduling while atomic:
irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:12:08 +0200
Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri,
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-12
Severity: important
Forwarded Message
From: Arne Nordmark nordm...@mech.kth.se
To: 574...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 12:37:10 +0200
I find a similar oops very
Forwarded Message
From: Arne Nordmark nordm...@mech.kth.se
To: 574...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:40:20 +0200
My problem seems related to those in Ubuntu report #55
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 21:12 +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:40 +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote:
My problem seems related to those in Ubuntu report #55
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/55. If I
unload the 3c59x module, I
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
Possibily you are right. :)
It seems to be working for 2.6.32. I'll compile 2.6.34 today or
tomorrow without the patch and see if it also works.
Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in
release
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:34 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:00:35AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The rtl8192s_usb driver was claiming a number of device IDs which are
actually supported by the code in the rtl8192u_usb driver. Remove
them from rtl8192s_usb, and add more
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 584549 + pending
Bug #584549 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: please enable CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in
release candidates for 2.6.35 and will need to be reverted there as well
if it
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 02:09 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in
release
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 586494 - moreinfo
Bug #586494 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't
work with 2.6.26
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586494:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 13:26 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Hi,
netdev wasn't particularly interested, but Julius Volz, the author of
this code directed me to the lvs-users mailing list. Nobody reported
any problem since then, but I got a success report, see
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 06:33 -0400, trouble daemon wrote:
Ben,
Another option that may be worth trying is 'noapic'.
Wow, that worked just fine actually on 2.6.26 stock kernel. Thanks a lot!
I am curious though, what in the world changed since 2.6.18 and lower
versions that might have
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:35:19 +0100
with message-id 1277343319.26161.101.ca...@localhost
and subject line Re: Bug#551101: still exists
has caused the Debian Bug report #551101,
regarding cannot kill processes trying to open defective CD-ROM
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Please can you confirm or correct the following summary of your results
so far:
Debian 2.6.32-15: fails to pass traffic
Correct.
Debian 2.6.32-15 with patch reverted: good
I had no crashes since Monday (June 21st).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 584881 moreinfo
Bug #584881 [linux-2.6] Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID) resync/check
implicated
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
584881:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:11 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ben Hutchings writes (Re: Bug#584881: Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID)
resync/check implicated):
We really need to see the kernel messages reporting soft-lockup.
There aren't any. Or, if there are, it isn't printing them to the
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
I'm afraid I don't know much about interrupt routing so I don't think I
can get useful information out of it.
That's okay, the important thing is that noapic works at least.
I see that you also wrote to LKML and that
35 matches
Mail list logo