Bug#590653: lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions in kernel log every couple of seconds

2010-07-28 Thread Sammy Atmadja
Package: linux-image-2.6-686 Version: 2.6.32+27 Severity: minor The system is a KVM guest (host is squeeze, qemu-kvm version 0.12.4+dfsg-1, kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64). /var/log/syslog looks like this: Jul 28 08:03:35 brakiri kernel: [606636.002265] lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions Jul 28 08:03:35

Re: How to add new platform flavours to linux-2.6 source code package?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:02:01AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 23:01 +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote: 2. 'image-file' keyword: Does this keyword also affect the kernel image makefile target? No, it specifies the file to look at when checking that the kernel image size is

Re: How to add new platform flavours to linux-2.6 source code package?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:01:20PM +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote: book3s-amigaone 44x-sam440ep 3. 'configs' keyword: Contrary to my expectations I had add 'configs' entries for my flavours, whereas the normal powerpc and powerpc64 flavours don't need it. Why can't the build system find

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: The full series of patches can be found at http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git in the branch 2.6.32-pvhvm We have this code already, so no extra round. Bastian -- There's a way out of any

Bug#590658: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: 2.6.26-2 bigmem nfs4 kerberos kernel panic

2010-07-28 Thread ulysse31
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system I have a desktop machine running debian lenny, with nfs4/kerberos for home directory accounting, which works great on my own machine. But on a specific machine, it kernel panics all nights, when the

Bug#590658: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: 2.6.26-2 bigmem nfs4 kerberos kernel panic

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 590658 important thanks On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:42:13AM +0200, ulysse31 wrote: Who? Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system No, the kernel is the system. ** Tainted: P (1) * Proprietary module has been loaded. This

Processed: Re: Bug#590658: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: 2.6.26-2 bigmem nfs4 kerberos kernel panic

2010-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 590658 important Bug #590658 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: 2.6.26-2 bigmem nfs4 kerberos kernel panic Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: The full series of patches can be found at http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git in the branch 2.6.32-pvhvm We have this code already,

Bug#590661: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: openswan ipsec packets do not reach openvz instances

2010-07-28 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: important Tags: squeeze -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-18) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-2) ) #1 SMP Sat Jul 24 02:32:56 UTC 2010 ** Command line:

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 03:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: The pvhvm drivers for Xen allow a fully virtualised guest (aka HVM) to use the Xen PV disk and network interfaces the same as a Xen guest running paravirtualised, in addition they

Bug#590661: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: openswan ipsec packets do not reach openvz instances

2010-07-28 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: important Tags: squeeze -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-18) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
I did not request a copy of this mail, please respect that. On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:43:50AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: We have this code already, so no extra round. In the xen flavour only though. I'd like to get these drivers into

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:18 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: I did not request a copy of this mail, please respect that. Sure, sorry about that. On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:43:50AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: We have this code already, so

Bug#590661: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: openswan ipsec packets do not reach openvz instances

2010-07-28 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:09:41AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote: see no posted evidence here, but anyway please post tcpdumps and setup in upstream bugzilla.openvz.org and let us know bug nr so that it can be tracked. I attached some ASCII-tcpdump output at the end of the report. Below

Bug#590661: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: openswan ipsec packets do not reach openvz instances

2010-07-28 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:50 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: important Tags: squeeze -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64

Bug#590658: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: 2.6.26-2 bigmem nfs4 kerberos kernel panic

2010-07-28 Thread Victor Gomes Do Vale
Bastian Blank wrote: severity 590658 important thanks On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:42:13AM +0200, ulysse31 wrote: Who? Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system No, the kernel is the system. ** Tainted: P (1) * Proprietary

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:18 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: This is no excuse, the installer uses the real PV kernel. Not when running in an HVM guest it doesn't, which is the whole point of this driver. You can always decide to use

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: The full series of patches can be found at http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git in the branch 2.6.32-pvhvm I still veto the xenfs change. For rationale see

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 12:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:18 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: This is no excuse, the installer uses the real PV kernel. Not when running in an HVM guest it doesn't, which is the

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 12:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: The full series of patches can be found at http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git in the branch 2.6.32-pvhvm I still veto the xenfs

Bug#590661: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: openswan ipsec packets do not reach openvz instances

2010-07-28 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:30 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:09:41AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote: [...] in netkey-mode. I'll post the setup-guide for reproduction and the binary tcpdump ASAP. ok sorry overlooked, as wasn't in body, please make upstream devs

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:38:43AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 12:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: You can always decide to use HVM or PV. PV is already pretty well supported. So is HVM and I see no reason not to offer users of Debian in a Xen guest the flexibility to

Bug#517716: Acknowledgement (linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: HC died; cleaning up when importing photographs via PTP using gthumb)

2010-07-28 Thread Mike Crowe
Unfortunately the motherboard that I saw this problem on died. :( I tried to reproduce it on my new Intel motherboard using linux-image-2.6.26-2-686 v2.6.26-24 but could not do so. Thanks. Mike. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#583139: linux-2.6: no DHCP offers on r8169

2010-07-28 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, For the record, after more investigation, this appears not to be related to the kernel at all (sorry) but ot a misbehaving DHCP server that only answers on broadcast. My ISP must have changed its config. $ cat /var/log/daemon.log.1 /var/log/daemon.log 2/dev/null | grep dhclient | cut -d':'

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: Anything I can help with? Testing the new packages from [1]: | 052925077f22f79042934f25d03708eb18ebf1fe56f1d9d7b1c086dd72ee8f81 linux-2.6_2.6.32-19~xen.1.diff.gz | 4c88c5bb57b68981f919323f61f272d42157c8be7bee107b7b58fb031d090d9d

Bug#570382: after upgrade: vlogin: openpty(): No such file or directory

2010-07-28 Thread Reinhard Brunzema
As a workaround instead of stopping and restarting you might want to use vmount on the affected vservers: # vmount foo -- -a You will get some error messages for all already correctly mounted filesystems, but you can enter your vserver again. Running ### for vserver in `vserver-stat | tail

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:35:54PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: Anything I can help with? Testing the new packages from [1]: | 052925077f22f79042934f25d03708eb18ebf1fe56f1d9d7b1c086dd72ee8f81 linux-2.6_2.6.32-19~xen.1.diff.gz |

Processed: bug 588574 is forwarded to http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/20/213

2010-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 588574 http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/20/213 Bug #588574 [linux-2.6] [ia64] gdb FTBFS and freezes / reboots the machine Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/20/213'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Re: How to add new platform flavours to linux-2.6 source code package?

2010-07-28 Thread Gerhard Pircher
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:02:01 +0100 Von: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk An: Gerhard Pircher gerhard_pirc...@gmx.net, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Betreff: Re: How to add new platform flavours to linux-2.6 source code package? Thanks for the

Re: How to add new platform flavours to linux-2.6 source code package?

2010-07-28 Thread Gerhard Pircher
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:32:04 +0200 Von: Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org An: Gerhard Pircher gerhard_pirc...@gmx.net CC: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Betreff: Re: How to add new platform flavours to linux-2.6 source code package? On Tue, Jul 27,

Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink

2010-07-28 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.97.2 Severity: normal Hi, for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and created a symlink /sbin/init → /sbin/upstart This causes a boot failure, due to this check in /usr/share/initramfs- tools/init # Check init bootarg if [ -n

Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink

2010-07-28 Thread Michael Prokop
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 01:13:01AM +0200]: for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and created a symlink /sbin/init → /sbin/upstart This causes a boot failure, due to this check in /usr/share/initramfs- tools/init # Check init

Bug#590744: marked as done (Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink)

2010-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:37:55 +0200 with message-id 2010-07-29t01-34...@devnull.michael-prokop.at and subject line Re: Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink has caused the Debian Bug report #590744, regarding Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink to be marked as

Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-07-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 03:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: The pvhvm drivers for Xen allow a fully virtualised guest (aka HVM) to use the Xen PV disk and network interfaces the same

Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink

2010-07-28 Thread Michael Biebl
reopen 590744 retitle 590744 Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a non-relative symlink thanks On 29.07.2010 01:37, Michael Prokop wrote: * Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 01:13:01AM +0200]: for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and created a

Processed: Re: Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink

2010-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 590744 Bug #590744 {Done: Michael Prokop m...@debian.org} [initramfs-tools] Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink retitle 590744 Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a non-relative symlink Bug #590744 [initramfs-tools] Fails to boot if

Bug#517716: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: HC died; cleaning up when importing photographs via PTP using gthumb)

2010-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:12:27 +0100 with message-id 1280362347.13192.95.ca...@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#517716: Acknowledgement (linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: ehci_hcd :00:02.2: HC died; cleaning up when importing photographs via PTP using gthumb) has caused the Debian

Bug#590480: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: webcam does not work with gspca driver

2010-07-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:11 +0200, Marco Bajo wrote: Hi Ben, I tried with camstream and skype (32bit version forced). With camstream nothing happened, camstream versions before 0.27+dfsg-4 don't work with most recent camera drivers. with skype the led near the webcam makes a single pulse,

Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink

2010-07-28 Thread Michael Prokop
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 02:16:32AM +0200]: On 29.07.2010 01:37, Michael Prokop wrote: * Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 01:13:01AM +0200]: for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and created a symlink

Bug#590658: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: 2.6.26-2 bigmem nfs4 kerberos kernel panic

2010-07-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:42 +0200, ulysse31 wrote: [...] kernel:[63659.784275] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP [...] kernel:[63659.784275] [c017b969] kmem_cache_alloc+0x47/0x87 [...] kernel:[63659.784275] Code: 8b 75 00 39 ee 75 15 8b 75 10 8d 45 10 c7 45 34 01 00 00 00 39 c6 0f 84 a5 00 00

Bug#590653: lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions in kernel log every couple of seconds

2010-07-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 08:19 +0200, Sammy Atmadja wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6-686 Version: 2.6.32+27 Severity: minor The system is a KVM guest (host is squeeze, qemu-kvm version 0.12.4+dfsg-1, kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64). /var/log/syslog looks like this: Jul 28 08:03:35 brakiri kernel:

Processed: reassign 590653 to linux-2.6

2010-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 590653 linux-2.6 2.6.32-15 Bug #590653 [linux-image-2.6-686] lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions in kernel log every couple of seconds Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6-686' to 'linux-2.6'. Bug No longer marked as found in

Processed: tagging 505609

2010-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Not applicable to squeeze; LILO must install kernel hook tags 505609 + lenny Bug #505609 {Done: dann frazier da...@debian.org} [linux-2.6] Unbootable after kernel upgrade: Lilo can't load kernel Bug #535331 {Done: dann frazier