Re: Xen pvhvm driver support for squeeze?

2010-08-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 17:51 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: The diff of source_amd64_xen before and after adding the pvhvm patches is then tiny (see below) and results from merging v2.6.32.19 myself instead of just rebasing the pvops patch to e.g. e73f4955a821f850f5b88c32d12a81714523a95f. I don't

Bug#571239: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: CIFS OOPS in cifs:CIFSFindNext+0x174/0x2dc

2010-08-20 Thread Ronald Moesbergen
tags 571239 - moreinfo thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin-sfgaacrnjdcfcmy13sxqf_yqjgjnev+c1...@mail.gmail.com

Processed: your mail

2010-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 571239 - moreinfo Bug #571239 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: CIFS OOPS in cifs:CIFSFindNext+0x174/0x2dc Removed tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 571239:

Bug#593454: fancontrol doesn't work and my laptop special buttons.

2010-08-20 Thread stratovarius stratovarius
Thanks. Ps: i write dony but it will be sony, sorry for this.

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Graphics driver fixes for squeeze kernel-xen ?

2010-08-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 12:38 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Bastian Blank wrote: It would be a terrible shame if Squeeze did not have support for the modern graphics subsystem when running Xen. Well. All the intel cards seems to work. Bastian I can confirm that issues that has been

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Graphics driver fixes for squeeze kernel-xen ?

2010-08-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 13:13 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:32:58PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:28 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: However not this part. Only small commits are fixes and I consider the rest as hacks. Which commits in

Bug#593679: OCFS2: 2 node cluster, kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c:169!

2010-08-20 Thread Ronald Moesbergen
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: important Tags: patch I'm running a 2 node cluster that mounts an OCFS2 filesystem on both nodes. The disk containing the filesystem is an iScsi volume hosted on a SAN device. During simultaneous use of the filesystem by both nodes

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

2010-08-20 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: grave The images have to conflict against versions of the bootloaders not supporting installation on its own. Bastian -- Violence in reality is quite different from theory. -- Spock, The Cloud Minders, stardate 5818.4 -- To

Bug#593340: linux-2.6: please add new Debian arch: powerpcspe

2010-08-20 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Here is version two of the patch including following changes: - rebased against trunk - removed initramfs-uimage-format - reusing powerpc's config. All FB driver which are =y are switched to =m - # CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is not set is gone - the dtb package is gone. The kernel image

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

2010-08-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 12:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: grave The images have to conflict against versions of the bootloaders not supporting installation on its own. How would that help? It's likely to cause the bootloader to be removed.

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

2010-08-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:07:05PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 12:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: The images have to conflict against versions of the bootloaders not supporting installation on its own. How would that help? As always, the packages are upgraded before the

Bug#593702: RM: usplash -- ROM; buggy as hell

2010-08-20 Thread maximilian attems
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal usplash squarbles your screen and is in the days of KMS graphic drivers no longer useful. Newer initramfs should use plymouth for graphical display. usplash was a nice hack, but includes duplicate bogl. please remove from sid. thanks -- maks --

Bug#592187: [stable] Bug#576838: virtio network crashes again

2010-08-20 Thread Lukas Kolbe
Hi all, I was finally able to identify the patch series that introduced the fix (they were introduced to -stable in 2.6.33.2): cb63112 net: add __must_check to sk_add_backlog a12a9a2 net: backlog functions rename 51c5db4 x25: use limited socket backlog c531ab2 tipc: use limited

Processed: Kernel: merge reports

2010-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 592415 important Bug #592415 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-686: invisible mouse under GDM and GNOME Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' merge 592415 592955 Bug#592415: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-686: invisible mouse under

Bug#592415: Invisible mouse update

2010-08-20 Thread Cesare Leonardi
The latest kernel from experimental (2.6.35-1~experimental.2) didn't solved the problem. I've done some research and i can confirm that this bug is related to 855 intel chipset, and it is quite common. These bugs from Ubuntu and Arch contains useful informations:

Bug#593720: Fwd: Deadline as default scheduler?

2010-08-20 Thread Cesare Leonardi
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.2 Severity: normal This bug report is just a reminder that comes from a message i sent on d-k mailing list: appended inline my initial message and the reply from Ben Hutchings. The original message was about 2.6.35-1~experimental.1, but in

Re: Kernel 2.6.35

2010-08-20 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 19/08/2010 01:54, Jeff Carr wrote: Could you make the 2.6.35 package available in only sid? If as soon as you put it in sid, it automagically tries to build it for testing and stable -- then I could see how that would be a problem. In that case, the proper thing to do might be to figure out

Bug#593740: linux-patch-debian-2.6.26: xen patch does not compile

2010-08-20 Thread Tyler
Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.26 Version: 2.6.26-24lenny1 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source I outlined the bug in this (totally unanswered) xen-users mailing list post: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-08/msg00282.html Please note bug

Bug#593747: [linux-2.6] standy issue with my laptop Dell Latitude D630

2010-08-20 Thread Guy Roussin
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-20 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Since upgrade to 2.6.32-20 (i think 2.6.32-19 is safe) my laptop do not wakeup in standby mode (blank screen). I need to press 5 seconds the power button to restart. Downgrade to squeeze

Bug#593747: [linux-2.6] standy issue with my laptop Dell Latitude D630

2010-08-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:34:21PM +0200, Guy Roussin wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-20 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Since upgrade to 2.6.32-20 (i think 2.6.32-19 is safe) my laptop do not wakeup in standby mode (blank screen). I need to

Processed: tagging 593747

2010-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 tags 593747 moreinfo Bug #593747 [linux-2.6] [linux-2.6] standy issue with my laptop Dell Latitude D630 Added tag(s) moreinfo. End of message, stopping processing here.

Re: [PATCHv2] Nuke a few easily Lintian warnings

2010-08-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 22:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 07:41 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: I happened to notice on packages.qa.debian.org that the kernel packages have 250 lintian warnings, of which the vast majority come from just a few easy to fix issues. Patch

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

2010-08-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 01:18:09PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:07:05PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 12:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: The images have to conflict against versions of the bootloaders not supporting installation on its own.

Bug#588200: linux-2.6: Please enable CONFIG_PROC_EVENTS

2010-08-20 Thread Riccardo Magliocchetti
Hello, i second that. CONFIG_PROC_EVENTS available when CONFIG_CONNECTOR=y is needed by bootchart2 for which i opened an RFP [1]. Having the default debian kernel working out of the box would help a lot. Thanks, riccardo [1] http://bugs.debian.org/590858 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#593760: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: gdb /bin/true crashes the system if oprofile is in use under xen

2010-08-20 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: normal Steps to reproduce: 1) boot debian under xen 2) sudo aptitude install oprofile gdb 3) sudo opcontrol --init --no-vmlinux 4) sudo opcontrol --start 5) gdb /bin/true 6) type break main and enter 7) type y and enter 8) type run and enter

Bug#584583: initramfs-tools: configure_networking function: repeatedly makes DHCP requests

2010-08-20 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen, i think i've figured out the initramfs-tools portion of this problem (there may still be outstanding issues with ipconfig). tested the attached patch, which seems to address the issue for me at least. live well, vagrant commit

Processed: block 590858 with 588200

2010-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 590858 with 588200 Bug #590858 [wnpp] RFP: bootchart2 -- An improved boot process performance analyser Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 590858: 588200 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#593760: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: gdb /bin/true crashes the system if oprofile is in use under xen

2010-08-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:16:02PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: normal Steps to reproduce: 1) boot debian under xen 2) sudo aptitude install oprofile gdb 3) sudo opcontrol --init --no-vmlinux 4) sudo opcontrol --start 5) gdb

Bug#593760: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: gdb /bin/true crashes the system if oprofile is in use under xen

2010-08-20 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: I think we may have to deprecate or disable oprofile. As an alternative you can use perf, which is actively developed and much easier to use. Hmm, ok. Does this also happen under a non-Xen kernel? (I can check myself, but not right at this

Bug#593792: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffd17c8c (do_vfs_ioctl)

2010-08-20 Thread Thiemo Nagel
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: normal this killed my X: gdm[1826]: WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal X error - Restarting :0 [101389.218207] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffd17c8c [101389.218223] IP: [c10bd1ab] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3ad/0x4e5 [101389.218242]

Bug#593793: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000041 (__d_lookup+0xb5/0xd3)

2010-08-20 Thread Thiemo Nagel
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-15 Severity: normal that one is a couple of weeks old. (I've rebooted in between). [154768.442008] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0041 [154768.442026] IP: [c10c0d46] __d_lookup+0xb5/0xd3 [154768.442046] *pde =

Bug#593800: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: Install error (failed to preconfigure) with /tmp mounted noexec

2010-08-20 Thread Thomas Rutter
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-24lenny1 Severity: normal Install of package reported an error - failed to preconfigure - due to /tmp being mounted as noexec. This was during an attempted upgrade to latest linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64 from lenny updates (recently). Install log: Reading

Processed: reassign 593800 to debconf

2010-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 593800 debconf Bug #593800 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: Install error (failed to preconfigure) with /tmp mounted noexec Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'debconf'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#593793: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000041 (__d_lookup+0xb5/0xd3)

2010-08-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 01:07 +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-15 Severity: normal that one is a couple of weeks old. (I've rebooted in between). [...] Unless this is reproducible, there is little we can do with this information. However, if you want to record

Bug#593792: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffd17c8c (do_vfs_ioctl)

2010-08-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 01:00 +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: normal this killed my X: [...] [101389.218478] EIP: 0060:[c10bd1ab] EFLAGS: 00213293 CPU: 0 [101389.218487] EIP is at do_vfs_ioctl+0x3ad/0x4e5 [...] [101389.218641] Code: f2 ff ff ff e9

Processed: tagging 593792

2010-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 593792 + moreinfo Bug #593792 [linux-2.6] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffd17c8c (do_vfs_ioctl) Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593792:

Bug#593760: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: gdb /bin/true crashes the system if oprofile is in use under xen

2010-08-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 22:16 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: normal Steps to reproduce: 1) boot debian under xen 2) sudo aptitude install oprofile gdb 3) sudo opcontrol --init --no-vmlinux 4) sudo opcontrol --start 5) gdb /bin/true 6)

Re: [PATCHv2] Nuke a few easily Lintian warnings

2010-08-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 19:14 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 22:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 07:41 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: I happened to notice on packages.qa.debian.org that the kernel packages have 250 lintian warnings, of which the vast

Processed: reassign 593740 to kernel-package

2010-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 593740 kernel-package Bug #593740 [linux-patch-debian-2.6.26] linux-patch-debian-2.6.26: xen patch does not compile Bug reassigned from package 'linux-patch-debian-2.6.26' to 'kernel-package'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions