kernel oops and kerneloops.org

In Bug#630360 is this text: If you ever have to send kernel bug/oops messages again, a photo is acceptable if the text is readable. There is no need to type it all in. I have the package kerneloops installed. Yesterdag I had in /var/log/syslog these lines: Jun 13 21:04:44 debian kerneloops:

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.32-35_i386.changes

linux-2.6_2.6.32-35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-2.6_2.6.32-35.dsc linux-2.6_2.6.32-35.diff.gz linux-doc-2.6.32_2.6.32-35_all.deb linux-manual-2.6.32_2.6.32-35_all.deb linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-35_all.deb

Bug#615048: marked as done (base: After removing lvm snapshot got kernel BUG at /build/.../source_amd64_xen/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1649!)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:00:54 + with message-id e1qwoyq-0005vc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#613634: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35 has caused the Debian Bug report #613634, regarding base: After removing lvm snapshot got kernel BUG at

Bug#624307: marked as done (xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: lvm causes kernel panic - kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860!)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:00:54 + with message-id e1qwoyq-0005vc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#613634: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35 has caused the Debian Bug report #613634, regarding xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: lvm causes kernel panic - kernel BUG at

Bug#617364: marked as done (linux-2.6: lseek() over NFS is returning an incorrect file length under some, circumstances)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:00:54 + with message-id e1qwoyq-0005vh...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#617364: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35 has caused the Debian Bug report #617364, regarding linux-2.6: lseek() over NFS is returning an incorrect file length under some,

Bug#625752: marked as done (linux-latest-2.6: Add sys_accept4 to arm)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:00:54 + with message-id e1qwoyq-0005vm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#625752: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35 has caused the Debian Bug report #625752, regarding linux-latest-2.6: Add sys_accept4 to arm to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#626284: marked as done (Bogus UDP Fragmentation Offload packet generation)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:00:54 + with message-id e1qwoyq-0005vr...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#626284: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35 has caused the Debian Bug report #626284, regarding Bogus UDP Fragmentation Offload packet generation to be marked as done. This means

linux-2.6_2.6.32-35_i386.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-35_all.deb to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-35_all.deb linux-2.6_2.6.32-35.diff.gz to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-35.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.32-35.dsc to

Bug#630360: linux-2.6: sporadic kernel bug while trying to hibernate system

Ok, next time I will send photo. Kernel 2.6.36 was perfectly hibernating. I noticed that first affected kernel was 2.6.38. So I tried newest kernel from unstable (2.6.39), but defect remained. haldyr On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 00:45, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Mon, 2011-06-13

Bug#630474: linux 3.0 package names should probably not include SUBLEVEL

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal SUBLEVEL is reserved for -stable in kernel 3.0 and newer. As Debian kernels did not include the part of the version number used for stable updates in the past, I expect that you are not planning to include them now. Thus,

Re: kernel oops and kerneloops.org

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 08:24 +0200, Stappers wrote: In Bug#630360 is this text: If you ever have to send kernel bug/oops messages again, a photo is acceptable if the text is readable. There is no need to type it all in. I have the package kerneloops installed. Yesterdag I had in

Bug#630474: marked as done (linux 3.0 package names should probably not include SUBLEVEL)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:00:53 + with message-id 20110614120053.ga24...@vostochny.stro.at and subject line Re: Bug#630474: linux 3.0 package names should probably not include SUBLEVEL has caused the Debian Bug report #630474, regarding linux 3.0 package names should probably not

Re: Bug#617453: linux-2.6: restarting doesn't always work on Dell Latitude E6400

I hit the same problem with aDell Optiplex 360, except it nevers works ( Prints Will now restart, then Restarting System, then I have to poweroff the machine to restart it...).

Bug#630474: linux 3.0 package names should probably not include SUBLEVEL

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:00 +, maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal SUBLEVEL is reserved for -stable in kernel 3.0 and newer. As Debian kernels did not

Re: linux target framework (tgt) packaging request

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:52:49 +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: Hello everybody, Who wants to package tgt and put in into debian backports? I am willing to pay a bounty for it, just name a price you think is reasonable! # What I want: tgt-1.0.17 with lsb compliant initscript apt-get install tgt -t

Bug#625922: Failures with ST2000DL003-9VT166

I'm seeing the same sort of failure with a pair of these same drives: [ 3.570733] ata3.00: ATA-8: ST2000DL003-9VT166, CC32, max UDMA/133 wired into a rather old (2007ish) motherboard: http://www.intel.com/p/pt_BR/support/highlights/dsktpboards/dg31pr Base Board Information

Bug#630474: linux 3.0 package names should probably not include SUBLEVEL

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:26 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:00 +, maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal SUBLEVEL is

Bug#625922: Failures with ST2000DL003-9VT166

Other potentially related issues: http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=65t=51496p=306494 http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=182t=39893start=30 http://forums.seagate.com/t5/Barracuda-XT-Barracuda-Barracuda/ST2000DL003-Barracuda-Green-not-detected-at-BIOS/td-p/87154/page/7

Re: Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.35-rc5-amd64: The Kernel panics on starting X using latest xorg-intel driver

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:15:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 04:52:56AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: # tags 589690 - moreinfo # quit # Version: 2.6.38-1 # # The above idiom doesn't work.

Bug#620480: I'm having random freezes on a GM965

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 04:08:10 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Julien Cristau wrote: What part of it? The i965 driver segfaulting on allocation failure: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36372#c2 Ah. Probably. From what Chris says it's fixed in later versions though.

Re: kernel oops and kerneloops.org

Stappers stapp...@stappers.nlTue, June 14, 2011 2:24:17 AM wrote: [...] I have the package kerneloops installed. Yesterdag I had in /var/log/syslog these lines: Jun 13 21:04:44 debian kerneloops: Submitted 1 kernel oopses to www.kerneloops.org Jun 13 21:04:44 debian kerneloops:

Vai tev tīk, ka maigas rociņas to paijā ?

Nu ja, es tagad darbojos jaunā vietā un man gribētos tev tā kā drusku pasūdzēties.. mūsu firma ir noteikusi crazy cenas, tikai 20 Ls un jādarbojas mums ir nevis masieru formas tērpos, bet mazās biksītēs.. paskaties pats: http://www.edenesalons.in Treisija -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: linux target framework (tgt) packaging request

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 16:08 +0200, Cyril LAVIER wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:52:49 +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: Hello everybody, Who wants to package tgt and put in into debian backports? I am willing to pay a bounty for it, just name a price you think is reasonable! [...] Hi Jelle.