Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 631567 + moreinfo
Bug #631567 [linux-source-2.6.39] [linux-source-2.6.39] Recompiled kernel crash
on kms with radeon HD6670
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
631567: http
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 23:55 +0200, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.39
> Version: 2.6.39-2
> Severity: important
>
> Often the recompiled kernel (with a debian-way: make-kpkg --initrd
> binary-arch) crashed on loading of the KMS.
>
> The system is freezed, the keyboard is dead,
Anyone else want to comment on these changes?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 631574 + pending
Bug #631574 [linux-2.6] Oops while trying to mount installer CD-ROM
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
631574: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 04:11 +0200, Pierre Carrier wrote:
> I really, really don't want upstream to be so stupid.
> I might end up being completely wrong, in which case I apologize and
> will buy a drink to author(s) of kconfig I offended.
>
> I went to both extremities of my git repo, v2.6.12 and
I really, really don't want upstream to be so stupid.
I might end up being completely wrong, in which case I apologize and
will buy a drink to author(s) of kconfig I offended.
I went to both extremities of my git repo, v2.6.12 and 3.0rc4, and I
found in both cases, in linux2.6.git/scripts/kconfig/
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-2
Severity: normal
With linux-image-2.6.39-2-686-pae, my kernel's console does not use my
monitor's native resolution (1600x1200) and instead uses 1280x1024.
On the other hand linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem used 1600x1200 just fine.
My hardware is recognized by
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:42:32 +0100
with message-id <20110624234232.gu29...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#631572: linux-2.6: kconfig.py confuses unset (through
a comment) with set to "no"
has caused the Debian Bug report #631572,
regarding linux-2.6: kconfig.py confuses
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # only in custom configuration
> severity 631567 normal
Bug #631567 [linux-source-2.6.39] [linux-source-2.6.39] Recompiled kernel crash
on kms with radeon HD6670
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-2
Severity: important
Hello,
I was testing today's sparc daily d-i build and noticed that the
kernel oopses during pkgsel stage, while trying to mount the installer
CD:
[ 2124.205340] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
[ 2124.308334] tsk->{mm,ac
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
debian/lib/python/debian_linux/kconfig.py considers that:
# CONFIG_EXAMPLE is not set
is equivalent to:
CONFIG_EXAMPLE=n
For example, if debian/config/kernelarch-x86/config contains:
# CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is not set
and one adds to debian/config/config:
CONFIG_
On Jun 24, 2011, at 16:02, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2.6.32 kernel I am using is this
one:
J_ASSERT(
On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> >> Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2.6.32 kernel I am using is this
> >> one:
> >>
> >> J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_nr_buffers <=
> >>
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem
Version: 2.6.32-34squeeze1
Severity: normal
I'm running Xen 3.4.2 and 4.0.1 dom0s (on centos 5.5). I compiled
pvgrub from those upstream versions of xen, and when
/usr/lib/xen/boot/pv-grub-x86_32.gz tries to load the
2.6.32-5-686-bigmem kernel it fails:
B
On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2.6.32 kernel I am using is this
>> one:
>>
>> J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_nr_buffers <=
>> commit_transaction->t_outstanding_credits);
>
> Hmm, OK
On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2011, at 16:55, Sean Ryle wrote:
> > Maybe I am wrong here, but shouldn't the cast be to (unsigned long) or to
> > (sector_t)?
> >
> > Line 534 of commit.c:
> > jbd_debug(4, "JBD: got buffer %llu (%p)\n",
> >
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 06:52 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 14:01 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [ . . . ]
> > This is the world where there is an ever-growing number of bugs open on
> > the kernel package. We certainly don't have the resources to
> > investigate bugs in other s
the issue seems to exist with other distros and routers, too.
http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=617841&sid=60cca64962f1b26b474f3a89c2963ab6
I agree that the problem lies with the routers, since they shouldn't
break the network operation whatever a connected client does or doesnt.
Howev
Le 23/06/2011 21:27, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the linux-2.6 package:
#631354: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: Kernel doesn't boot (fs error)
It has been closed by Ben Hutchings.
Their explanation is att
19 matches
Mail list logo
