Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 631660 - moreinfo
Bug #631660 [src:linux-2.6] Black screen on GM45 starting from Linux 2.6.38
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> forwarded 631660 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38718
Bug #631660 [src:linux-2.6] Black screen on GM45 star
tags 631660 - moreinfo
forwarded 631660 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38718
quit
Hi,
Edward Bartolo wrote:
> I did as instructed. The bug number is: 38718
Thanks much. Marking accordingly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:21:26PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:28:34PM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > Package: linux-source-2.6.39
> > Version: 2.6.39-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Summary: I recompiled with make menuconfig, loaded the default
> > config for linux-ima
On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:01, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:30:11PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>>> I've found some. So although data=journal users are minority, there are
>>> some. That being said I agree with you we should do something about it
>>> - either state that we want to fully
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:28:34PM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.39
> Version: 2.6.39-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Summary: I recompiled with make menuconfig, loaded the default
> config for linux-image-2.6.39-486-2 into menuconfig, disabled ACPI,
> enabled APM (but not the su
On Mon 27-06-11 12:01:40, Ted Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:30:11PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > > I've found some. So although data=journal users are minority, there are
> > > some. That being said I agree with you we should do something about it
> > > - either state that we want to f
Ian Campbell writes:
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 19:55 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> As a STONITH measure, I issued reboot -f on a Xen dom0 while several
>> domUs were running. This didn't kill the machine but resulted in the
>> BUGs below, and made further interaction impossible, although the k
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 631843 important
Bug #631843 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: General protection fault
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 631843 to the same value.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 631843 important
Bug #631843 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: General protection fault
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
631843: http://bu
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-35
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: breaks the whole system
This problem came after updating the kernel to the latest Debian release
which was released this weekend. There were to general protection faults
before the system become inaccesible. Th
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #515201 (http://bugs.debian.org/515201)
# * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:14:30AM -0400, John Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I asked this question on debian-user, and one person suggested that I
> ask here instead.
>
> Please include my email address in any replies, since I am not a
> subscriber to the list.
[...]
I think the answer is 'not until
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # was only merged after rc4
> reopen 631255
Bug #631255 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-amd64: aptitude install triggers kerneloops
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # was only merged after rc4
> reopen 631802
Bug #631802 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-686-pae: kernel oops while running 'aptitude install' on
a package
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:30:11PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > I've found some. So although data=journal users are minority, there are
> > some. That being said I agree with you we should do something about it
> > - either state that we want to fully support data=journal - and then we
> > shoul
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 27-06-11 13:16:50, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> > > > On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>
Hi,
I asked this question on debian-user, and one person suggested that I
ask here instead.
Please include my email address in any replies, since I am not a
subscriber to the list.
-- John
Original Message
Subject:e4rat broken; ext4_fiemap to be fixed any time soon?
Da
Ben,
As well as my report at http://forum1.netgear.com/showthread.php?t=67333
there is the report at
http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=617841&sid=60cca64962f1b26b474f3a89c2963ab6
The commonality is the 2.6.39 kernel, iwlagn, and Netgear so not
necessarily an indicator. The difference
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:53:58PM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2011/6/27 Ben Hutchings :
>
> >> While I am not entirely sure, I think proper way to add hooks would be:
> >> * one hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uImage from vmlinuz
> >> post package installation.
> >> *
On Mon 27-06-11 13:16:50, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> > On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> > > On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> > > >> Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2.6.
Hello,
2011/6/27 Ben Hutchings :
>> While I am not entirely sure, I think proper way to add hooks would be:
>> * one hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uImage from vmlinuz
>> post package installation.
>> * and other hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uInitrd after
>> initrd-
Ben,
> A friend has suggested the problem lies in allowing 802.11n and that I
> should retry using only 802.11g which I shall do to gain more data and
> report back so that there is a record in case someone actually is
> interested in fixing this "new feature" (as apparently it is not a
> bug :-)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:28:34AM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> flash-kernel is a debian-installer ARM utility which is able to
> produce bootable kernel and initramfs (aka initrd) images. It converts
> vmlinuz and initrd images to bootable format which the bootloader
> understands, mo
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:23:06AM +0200, Volodymyr Shcherbyna wrote:
> Dear Debian Team,
>
> This is my first message in this group, and beforehand I would like to thank
> you all for making Debian so great Operating System. Good job!
>
> Recently I have upgraded my Debian amd64 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 a
I solved the problem, see details here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
I'm sorry for having wasted your time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://l
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote:
>
>> On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> > On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote:
>> > > On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> > >> Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2
Hello,
flash-kernel is a debian-installer ARM utility which is able to
produce bootable kernel and initramfs (aka initrd) images. It converts
vmlinuz and initrd images to bootable format which the bootloader
understands, most common use is to generate uImage and uInitrd for
U-Boot booloader.
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 24-06-11 11:03:52, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> > On Jun 24, 2011, at 09:46, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Thu 23-06-11 16:19:08, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> > >> Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2.6.32 kernel I am using is this
> > >> one:
> > >>
> > >> J_
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:40:28 +
with message-id <20110627104028.ge23...@vostochny.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#631802: linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-686-pae: kernel oops
while running 'aptitude install' on a package
has caused the Debian Bug report #631802,
regarding linux-image-3.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 627547 + pending
Bug #627547 [initramfs-tools] /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: wrong arguments give
misleading error message
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
627547: http://b
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0~rc3-1~experimental.1
Severity: important
Hi,
today, while running 'aptitude install' on a package, the machine
crashed hard, requiring me to press the reset button:
Jun 27 10:32:12 spruce kernel: [ 6982.765536] [ cut here
]
Jun 27 10:3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 607888 + pending
Bug #607888 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: Generated initrds missing
critical modules
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607888: http://bugs.debian.org
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-35
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
On some of our servers, we periodically see "name_count maxed, losing inode
data" messages
in the kernel log.
>From what I can tell from Google, they are probably harmless and caused by the
auditing subsystem.
The following
Dear Debian Team,
This is my first message in this group, and beforehand I would like to thank
you all for making Debian so great Operating System. Good job!
Recently I have upgraded my Debian amd64 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 and I have noticed a
glitch when shutting down machine remotely. When I am doing "s
34 matches
Mail list logo
