Bug#635826: hda-intel (CX20549 (Venice)): external speaker output and mic inputs mute

2011-08-15 Thread Antony Gelberg
I'm also seeing this - Johann have you reported it upstream? Bizarrely, I also have a problem with ogg123 - the pitch of the played back file is high compared to playing with e.g. Exaile. Not sure if that's related but Johann, would be interested to know if you get this behaviour as well.

Bug#637085: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Hard hang following BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000100

2011-08-15 Thread Paul Elliott
Thanks for looking into this Jonathan. We've spent the past week performing extensive tests both in a software sense and hardware sense. Here's the steps we've taken and the results obtained. 1) We've re-run our test script[1] on an ext4 file system provided by local 10k SAS disks. We used

Bug#637874: nfs-kernel-server: need to restart daily the server to let users mount the exports

2011-08-15 Thread yelloprotoss
Package: nfs-kernel-server Version: last one of debian stable , up to date Severity: important Hi, Since 1-2 years, the bug has not been fixed yet. Now debian testing is now stable, and bugs remains. OK. I will post you the content of my /etc//exports soon. it is however very basic and

Bug#637461: nfs-common: ]the issue is nfs-kernel-server

2011-08-15 Thread yelloprotoss
Package: nfs-common Severity: normal Please close the bug the issue is not nfs-common but nfs-kernel-server that has a very very serious bug. he, nfs-kernel-server is now in stable and lot of companies are using NFS :( I told you about a year ago about this serious bug.) BHappy Tux and

Bug#637877: linux-image-3.0.0.1 needs kernel headers to configure dkms

2011-08-15 Thread Grégory Soutadé
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: normal During kernel upgrade (2.6.39 to 3.0.0), run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms claims for kernel headers (that are not a dependency from kernel-image) -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 3.0.0-1-amd64 (Debian

Bug#637848: Changes from longterm 2.6.32.43

2011-08-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 04:47 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-35 Severity: normal 4553fbd ksm: fix NULL pointer dereference in scan_get_next_rmap_item() Appears to fix a local denial-of-service (oops). This is CVE-2011-2183 and was previously cherry-picked.

Bug#536860: linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c

2011-08-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 00:48 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I wonder how this should be dealt with wrt squeeze. For your amusement, here's an ugly proof-of-concept patch (against 2.6.32.y) that just does unaligned reads from struct taskstats. The only

Bug#637874: nfs-kernel-server: need to restart daily the server to let users mount the exports

2011-08-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 13:10 +0200, yelloprotoss wrote: Package: nfs-kernel-server Version: last one of debian stable , up to date Severity: important Hi, Since 1-2 years, the bug has not been fixed yet. Now debian testing is now stable, and bugs remains. OK. I will post you the

Processed: reassign 637461 to src:nfs-utils, reassign 637874 to src:nfs-utils, forcibly merging 637461 637874

2011-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 637461 src:nfs-utils Bug #637461 [nfs-common] nfs-common: On stations, does not mount at boot of server NFS share Bug reassigned from package 'nfs-common' to 'src:nfs-utils'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1:1.2.2-4.

Processed: reassign 637877 to dkms

2011-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 637877 dkms Bug #637877 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0.1 needs kernel headers to configure dkms Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'dkms'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 3.0.0-1. thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 627655

2011-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 627655 + pending Bug #627655 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-1-686-pae: missing NFS4.1 / pNFS support Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 627655:

Bug#589855: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: p54pci doesn't work with ISL3890 based card

2011-08-15 Thread Jan Capek
Hi Jonathan, I will try to test it with 2.6.38 from squeeze backports. I am sorry I didn't see the original message from Geoff.. Regards, Jan On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 19:01:06 -0500 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jan, Geoff Simmons wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:14:01PM

About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello, when I enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE for the Debian kernel the build fails with: CC init/do_mounts_initrd.o Arch sparc is not supported with CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD at .../scripts/recordmcount.pl line 368. This happens because the kernel package

Re: About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 17:21 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: Hello, when I enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE for the Debian kernel the build fails with: CC init/do_mounts_initrd.o Arch sparc is not supported with CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD at

Re: About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 11:33 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 17:21 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: Hello, when I enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE for the Debian kernel the build fails with: CC init/do_mounts_initrd.o Arch sparc is not

Re: About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:40:23AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 11:33 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 17:21 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: Hello, when I enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE for the Debian kernel the build

Re: About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:21:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: Hello, when I enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE for the Debian kernel the build fails with: CC init/do_mounts_initrd.o Arch sparc is not supported with CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD at

CVE-2011-1020

2011-08-15 Thread Arne Wichmann
FYI: Ubuntu seems to have a fix for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/813026 cu AW -- [...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support it. Noone can free you but yourself.

CVE-2011-1083

2011-08-15 Thread Arne Wichmann
Oh well, could have done this and the one before in one mail... FYI: Ubuntu seems to have a fix for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/813935 cu AW -- [...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are coerced, comply as much as you must to protect

Bug#637591: Add pci id for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9480

2011-08-15 Thread Alexander Kurtz
forwarded 637591 linux-s...@vger.kernel.org thanks On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 16:24 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Thanks! Please send this information (perhaps in patch form) to linux-s...@vger.kernel.org, cc-ing Xiangliang Yu yuxia...@marvell.com and James Bottomley james.bottom...@suse.de?

Processed: Re: Add pci id for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9480

2011-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 637591 linux-s...@vger.kernel.org Bug #637591 [src:linux-2.6] Add pci id for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9480 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'linux-s...@vger.kernel.org'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Re: About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread David Miller
From: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:40:23 -0400 Actually, I think option d) is the best. d) have sparc support recordmcount.c Maybe you misunderstand what these guys are doing. The recordmcount.pl script wants to look at the output of the architecture of the

Re: About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 12:44 -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:40:23 -0400 Actually, I think option d) is the best. d) have sparc support recordmcount.c Maybe you misunderstand what these guys are doing. The

Re: About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread David Miller
From: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:55:00 -0400 But if they use recordmcount.c instead, then nothing needs to be done with recordmcount.pl. recordmcount.c looks at the elf file itself to determine what arch it is for. If this is supported, then everything

Bug#637725: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Xen DomU restore fails with 3.0 kernel)

2011-08-15 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 00:13 +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote: I tested with DomU kernels 2.6.32-5-34squeeze1 (debian stable) and a 2.6.21 x86 (endian 2.2). The Dom0 was tested with 2.6.32-5-35 and 3.0.0-1, i.e. the latest squeeze and wheezy kernels. I don't recall there ever being a PV 2.6.21

Bug#637591: marked as done (Add pci id for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9480)

2011-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:45:31 +0200 with message-id 1313441131.12266.11.camel@localhost and subject line Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] mvsas: Add support for Marvell's 88SE9480 chip. has caused the Debian Bug report #637591, regarding Add pci id for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9480

Bug#637392: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: [drm:r600_audio_bits_per_sample] *ERROR* Unknown bits per sample 0xf using 16 instead

2011-08-15 Thread Jonathan Nieder
clone 637392 -1 retitle 637392 RV635 [Radeon HD 3600 series]: screen randomly turning off (GPU lockup) quit Volodymyr Shcherbyna wrote: I am still having the same problem with screen going randomly off (problem 1) and also I am unable to halt my system (problem 2). Sounds like at least

Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: [drm:r600_audio_bits_per_sample] *ERROR* Unknown bits per sample 0xf using 16 instead

2011-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 637392 -1 Bug#637392: RV635 [Radeon HD 3600 series]: white, grey, and black stripes with snow on bottom unless firmware is loaded Bug 637392 cloned as bug 637943. retitle 637392 RV635 [Radeon HD 3600 series]: screen randomly turning off

Bug#637874: nfs mounts unreliable

2011-08-15 Thread J
Hello Ben, I have been watching this bug because I have similar behaviour - but I do not know that it is the same. I have two exports from the nfs server, which are mounted by one client. After boot, it is common for one of the exports to mount correctly, while the other one is nowhere to

Re: About ARCH=sparc and what to pass to recordmcount.pl

2011-08-15 Thread David Miller
From: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:55:00 -0400 But if they use recordmcount.c instead, then nothing needs to be done with recordmcount.pl. Thanks again Steven, I'll push the following via the sparc tree. From

Bug#637874: nfs mounts unreliable

2011-08-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 07:52 +1000, J wrote: Hello Ben, I have been watching this bug because I have similar behaviour - but I do not know that it is the same. I have two exports from the nfs server, which are mounted by one client. After boot, it is common for one of the exports to

Re: [Stable-review] Future of the -longterm kernel releases (i.e. how we pick them).

2011-08-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 21:15 -0700, Greg KH wrote: [...] Today: Now that 2.6.32 is over a year and a half, and the enterprise distros are off doing their thing with their multi-year upgrade cycles, there's no real need from the distros for a new longterm kernel release. But it turns out

Re: [stable] [Stable-review] Future of the -longterm kernel releases (i.e. how we pick them).

2011-08-15 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:09:02AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: I see that you've accepted Willy Tarreau's offer to take over 2.6.32.y, so if you could just formalise that before /. goes wild over the looming end of all the above distributions, that would be nice. :-) The distros were doing