Bug#644135: cifs ignores sysct setting

2011-10-10 Thread Alexander Swen
I partly agree to the wishlist opinion, for the part where I ask for a loading option, however, imho cifs has a bug where it ignores the sysctl setting. Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Swen - Original Message - From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk To: Alexander Swen

Processed: Linux kernel: 2.6.32.42: (Debian Bug#637659): pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: address space collision on of device [0xc8000000-0xcfffffff]

2011-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 637659 Bug #637659 {Done: dann frazier da...@debian.org} [linux-2.6] pci :00:00.0: BAR 0: address space collision on of device [0xc800-0xcfff] 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may

Bug#637659: Linux kernel: 2.6.32.42: (Debian Bug#637659): pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: address space collision on of device [0xc8000000-0xcfffffff]

2011-10-10 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Paul, Paul Menzel wrote: Commit 29cf7a30 [3] addresses this issue for my board by adding a quirk. commit 29cf7a30f8a0ce4af2406d93d5a332099be26923 Author: Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net Date: Wed Aug 31 17:07:10 2011 +0200 x86/PCI:

Bug#644876: initramfs-tools: Boot failure from software RAID1 + LVM2 by timing of mdadm + lvm initiation

2011-10-10 Thread Jort Koopmans
Additional thoughts; As I'm no expert on the whole initramfs boot sequence I'm unsure about the total workings of timing of device scanning, mdadm + lvm2 routines and rootdelay. Imho it should be something like this; init Device scanning | some scanning delay parameter (for slow devices) |

Bug#637659: Linux kernel: 2.6.32.42: (Debian Bug#637659): pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: address space collision on of device [0xc8000000-0xcfffffff]

2011-10-10 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Jonathan Nieder wrote: Paul Menzel wrote: I am pretty sure though that they have not been there since the beginning. Yep, the regression fixed by 29cf7a30 was likely introduced by [...] Quick correction: that was only a regression within the merge window. Since we are just talking about a

Missing headers when compiling for 32 bits on amd64 wheezy.

2011-10-10 Thread Didier Trosset
Bonjour, I am having a trouble with the C system headers when compiling for 32 bits target on my amd64 wheezy system. This simple program #include errno.h int main() { return 0; } Does not compile correctly for 32 bits. The result is: $ gcc -m32 test-errno.c In file included from

Bug#644906: linux-2.6: e1000e: upstream workaround for packet drop on 82579LM at 100Mbps

2011-10-10 Thread Terry Burton
Package: linux-2.6 Source: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Many (but not all) devices including an Intel 82579LM NIC have a hardware fault that results in packet loss at 100Mbps that is worked around by the following recent patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/109926/

Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)

2011-10-10 Thread Hector Oron
Hello Ben, 2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this week.  This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI change (I haven't checked yet).  It should fix the FTBFS on some architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other

Bug#644747: Re: Re: Bug#644747: linux-image-3.0.0-2-amd64: udev doesn't create /dev/sr0, /dev/cdrom

2011-10-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:52:55AM -, R S Chakravarti wrote: After reading the Ubuntu bug report (#794642) I found that this Debian bug is also due to the SATA mode in my computer being set to IDE. When this is changed to AHCI the problem vanishes: /dev/cdrom appears. [...] Right, I

Bug#644135: cifs ignores sysct setting

2011-10-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:49:13AM +0200, Alexander Swen wrote: I partly agree to the wishlist opinion, for the part where I ask for a loading option, however, imho cifs has a bug where it ignores the sysctl setting. [...] The setting you have been using is not a sysctl. Ben. -- Ben

Re: Missing headers when compiling for 32 bits on amd64 wheezy.

2011-10-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
I think you need to install gcc-multilib. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: alsa-firmware - bug #597897

2011-10-10 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Od: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Hi Ben and others, first thank you for taking care about this issue. I think the ALSA developers should talk to the maintainers of the linux-firmware repository about adding the firmware blobs to that. The latter maintainers are David Woodhouse

Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)

2011-10-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
[Dropping debian-boot.] On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:00:10PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: Hello Ben, 2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this week.  This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI change (I

Re: Missing headers when compiling for 32 bits on amd64 wheezy.

2011-10-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:43:48PM +0200, Didier Trosset wrote: Bonjour Ben Thanks for your answer, but I already have libc6-dev-i386 and gcc-multilib installed. The problem is in this file $ more /usr/include/linux/errno.h #ifndef _LINUX_ERRNO_H #define _LINUX_ERRNO_H

Re: Missing headers when compiling for 32 bits on amd64 wheezy.

2011-10-10 Thread Didier Trosset
Bonjour Ben Thanks for your answer, but I already have libc6-dev-i386 and gcc-multilib installed. The problem is in this file $ more /usr/include/linux/errno.h #ifndef _LINUX_ERRNO_H #define _LINUX_ERRNO_H #include asm/errno.h #endif Where the referred asm/errno.h

Re: Missing headers when compiling for 32 bits on amd64 wheezy.

2011-10-10 Thread Didier Trosset
On 10/10/2011 05:50 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:43:48PM +0200, Didier Trosset wrote: Bonjour Ben Thanks for your answer, but I already have libc6-dev-i386 and gcc-multilib installed. The problem is in this file $ more /usr/include/linux/errno.h #ifndef

Bug#642154: [Xen-devel] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8803bb6ad000

2011-10-10 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:13:14AM +0400, rush wrote: OK, I tried it again, but Oops didn't gone. .. snip.. echo'Loading Xen 4.0-amd64 ...' multiboot /boot/xen-4.0-amd64.gz placeholder xsave=0 .. snip.. Was it right? Yup. I think.. this is a bit embarrassing. It took

Bug#641047: Bump

2011-10-10 Thread Andrea Cardaci
Just wanted to tell that the issue happened two more times in these months (last one yesterday; same details). I'd like to have some info about it. -- Andrea Cardaci http://behance.net/AndreaCardaci -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#641047: initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 issue with lvm and libncurses

2011-10-10 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 20:34:19 +0200, Andrea Cardaci wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 Version: 2.6.32-35squeeze1 After an apt-get upgrade today, I wasn't able to boot anymore, lvm complains that can't find libncurses.so.5, and it's right, the only libncurses.so.5 file in

Bug#641047: initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 issue with lvm and libncurses

2011-10-10 Thread Andrea Cardaci
Thanks for the reply. `apt-cache show initramfs-tools` says version 0.98.8 I tried to run `update-initramfs -v -t -u -k 2.6.32-5-amd64` and I noticed: [...] Adding library /32bit/usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 [...] where `/32bit/` is a chroot I've created some time ago, well I assume that's the

Bug#642154: [Xen-devel] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8803bb6ad000

2011-10-10 Thread rush
2011/10/10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com: Can I ask you to do one more thing? Can you upgrade to the xen-4.1.1 in the testing and try with the xsave (or without) and see if it works? Ok, but I need around a week for it. (some difficulties with access to this server at the

Bug#644938: [PATCH] mv_sas: OCZ RevoDrive3/zDrive R4 support

2011-10-10 Thread Андрей Василишин
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch, experimental Please add patch for latest kernel. More info: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg54889.html

Bug#644948: nfs-common: Wrong uid/gid with latest version using NFSv4

2011-10-10 Thread Nils S. Normann
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.5-2 Severity: important After upgrade to nfs-common 1:1.2.5-2 I noticed that uid/gid's are displayed as 'nobody' and 'nogroup' respectively. This is the case checking with both Nautilus and terminal. Downgrading to 1:1.2.4-1 from Testing fixes the problem. I

Bug#640391: Test result

2011-10-10 Thread Bart Hartgers
2011/10/9 ael law_ence@ntlworld.com: On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:40:01PM +0200, Bart Hartgers wrote: Does this new version make any difference? To confuse you, I did not include a version number in the filenames ;-). However, I fear that neither of the test versions that you sent make any