Bug#667446: linux-image-3.2.0-2-orion5x: leds-gpio fails on MV2120

2012-04-03 Thread Henry von Tresckow
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.12-1 Severity: normal During Bootup, the leds-gpio initalization fails with the following error message: leds-gpio: probe of leds-gpio failed with error -22 Only the power led stays lit. The /sys/class/leds directory is also empty. -- Package-specific info:

Bug#667434: lvcreate / lvremove snapshot under Xen causes Kernel OOPs

2012-04-03 Thread Quintin Russ
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 Version: 2.6.32-39 Severity: important We have observed an issue when a Xen dom0 is removing a snapshot for a logical volume and another process comes along to create a snapshot for that same device (different names) causing the server to Kernel Ooops. Ac

Bug#648766: [sparc] BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0

2012-04-03 Thread Kieron Gillespie
I have also noticed, that if I am reading the trace correctly that in both of my cases, and the original bug submitter's, and a bug posted on old.nabble.com's case the crash always seems to happen when one CPU is doing cheetah_xcall_deliver, and the other CPU is in the same instruction in tl0_i

Bug#600286: Info received (Bug#600286: atl1c driver hangs after "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1c): transmit queue 0 timed out")

2012-04-03 Thread pavka
debian testing kernel sid Apr 3 21:37:54 pavka kernel: [36561.844540] [ cut here ] Apr 3 21:37:54 pavka kernel: [36561.844552] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_3.2.13-1-i386-2plIcw/linux-2.6-3.2.13/debian/build/source_i386_none/net/sched/sch_generic.c:255 dev_watch

Bug#648766: [sparc] BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0

2012-04-03 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Kieron Gillespie wrote: > Here are the dmesg output from the current system running Linux > 3.2.13 with SMP enabled with tickless disabled. Great. Is this reproducible without nouveau? It might be possible to test by putting blacklist nouveau in /etc/modprobe.d/kg-disable-nouveau.con

Bug#638157: some pointers

2012-04-03 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
Hi, there is some more information regarding the issue on the linux-nfs mailing list starting with: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg24811.html and ending here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg24914.html A fix for squeeze would be great. Best regards, Andi

Bug#648766: [sparc] BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0

2012-04-03 Thread Kieron Gillespie
Here are the dmesg output from the current system running Linux 3.2.13 with SMP enabled with tickless disabled. [0.00] PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 4.9.7 2004/05/27 07:31' [0.00] PROMLIB: Root node compatible: [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] In

Processed: Re: [sparc] BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0

2012-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 648766 important Bug #648766 [src:linux-2.6] [sparc-unstable] kernel crash Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 648766: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#648766: [sparc] BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0

2012-04-03 Thread Jonathan Nieder
severity 648766 important quit Kieron Gillespie wrote: > I've attached some images to this bug message, not sure if they will > appear Received; thanks much. What version of the kernel are you using? Full "dmesg" output from a normal boot would be useful as well, so we can get to know your con

Processed: Re: drm/i915: no signal via DisplayPort on Sandy Bridge since Linux 3.2

2012-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 658662 + xserver-xorg-video-intel Bug #658662 [linux-2.6] drm/i915: no signal via DisplayPort on Sandy Bridge since Linux 3.2 Added indication that 658662 affects xserver-xorg-video-intel > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Processed: still an issue here

2012-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 638157 Bug #638157 {Done: Luk Claes } [nfs-kernel-server] nfs-kernel-server: attempt to mount -t nfs4 -o sec=krb5 hangs on squeeze, works with nfs-utils from testing 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;

Bug#638157: still an issue here

2012-04-03 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
reopen 638157 thanks Hi, for me this is still an issue. Fresh installation, real hardware, standard squeeze on client and server with nfs-common_1.2.2-4squeeze2 and nfs-kernel-server_1.2.2-4squeeze2 . As I described above, the mount hangs: root@workstation00:~# mount -t nfs4 -o sec=krb5i mains

Bug#633423: Problem with autofs 64-bit kernel/32-bit userspace compatibility

2012-04-03 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Horst Rauber wrote: > I'm having the same problem (autofs hangs when accessing an auto mount point) > with recent kernels, so I wonder if this is really fixed upstream or if there > is another cause. > > Affected kernel: vanilla 3.2.13 and 3.3.1 (both amd64) > Working kernel: 3.1.10 (amd64) >

Bug#661318: [PATCH 1/1] ata_piix: defer disks to the Hyper-V paravirtualised drivers by default Re: Possibility integrating newer Hyper-V paravirt drivers in squeeze?

2012-04-03 Thread Victor Miasnikov
Hi! This patch is "UBUNTU Way" Solution described in If I understand correctly, you are saying there are two patches that deal with deciding whether ata_piix or hv_storvsc handles a device and making sure CD-ROMs are still usable: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/51712 http://thread.

Bug#633423: Problem with autofs 64-bit kernel/32-bit userspace compatibility

2012-04-03 Thread Horst Rauber
Hi, I'm having the same problem (autofs hangs when accessing an auto mount point) with recent kernels, so I wonder if this is really fixed upstream or if there is another cause. Affected kernel: vanilla 3.2.13 and 3.3.1 (both amd64) Working kernel: 3.1.10 (amd64) Userspace: autofs5 5.0.4-3.2+b1

Bug#596741: patch from upstream

2012-04-03 Thread Jon Dowland
I tested a patch upstream and it solved the problem to me. I mailed it to the bug (but chose to use -quiet which I perhaps shouldn't have.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: