I'm running into a similar issue with a Debian6 system fully updated (standard
and -updates repos).
It's an IBM x3850, 16G of ram
I tried setting max_dom0_mem like stated here [1] but didn't solve the issue,
the server reboots after scrubbing free ram. Still hadn't chance to connect a
serial
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:19:25AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
2012/7/18 maximilian attems m...@stro.at:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:46:23PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
2012/7/17 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com:
Package: $fwpackagename
Architecture: all
+Conflicts:
* da...@lang.hm da...@lang.hm wrote:
Anybody who says I want to run Fedora without SELINUX
because I do my own security development is by *definition*
not relevant to the whole feature.
Don't mistake the example for the feature. the SELINUX thing
is just an example. As Alan Cox
2012/7/18 maximilian attems m...@stro.at:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:19:25AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
2012/7/18 maximilian attems m...@stro.at:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:46:23PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
2012/7/17 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com:
Package:
maximilian attems m...@stro.at writes:
Jonathan already answered it, saying that firmwares are put
in versioned dir.
Just use git to look it up, easy:
~/src/linux-next (master %=)$ git log scripts/package/builddeb
6607ddadf93d19c7f64139f1475c342152f39fe5
But..but.. won't that prevent
Martin-Éric Racine martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi writes:
Does the kernel look for modules in versioned, then non-versioned
directories, in that order? More importantly, does it even attempt
looking in the versioned directory at all?
/lib/udev/firmware.agent does this:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* da...@lang.hm da...@lang.hm wrote:
Anybody who says I want to run Fedora without SELINUX
because I do my own security development is by *definition*
not relevant to the whole feature.
Don't mistake the example for the feature. the SELINUX thing
is
* da...@lang.hm da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* da...@lang.hm da...@lang.hm wrote:
Anybody who says I want to run Fedora without SELINUX
because I do my own security development is by *definition*
not relevant to the whole feature.
Don't mistake the
There are various fairly important fixes pending for linux. When would
be a good time to upload these?
(There are also lots more fixes in the queue for 3.2.24, which I hope to
release next week.)
Ben.
linux (3.2.23-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* New upstream stable update:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
In addition to the minimal distro settings, we might also have a few
common platform settings, so that you could basically do a hey, I
have a modern PC laptop, make it pick the obvious stuff that a normal
10 matches
Mail list logo
