Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.32-1
Severity: important
I originally niticed the issue on Ubuntu 12.04.1, but could reproduce it on
Debian as well.
I upgraded a squeeze system to testing and found that NFS access
creates a high load on the NFS server. A single client machine with
a single
Sorry, I had a typo. It should have read:
The only change that I found was using -o proto=udp when mounting .
(instead of tcp which seems to be the default)
reading the iscsi mailing list link posted, it appears the final patch
addresses the issue concerned, and works on 32/32, 32/64 and 64/64. I have
it running here in my production environment on 32/32 and 32/64 with no
issues. what's happening with this bug?
Julia Longtin
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 07:18 -0500, Karsten Suehring wrote:
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.32-1
Severity: important
I originally niticed the issue on Ubuntu 12.04.1, but could reproduce it on
Debian as well.
I upgraded a squeeze system to testing and found that NFS access
creates a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 692957 + moreinfo
Bug #692957 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: NFS server causes high load
on 3.2 kernel
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692957:
Package: linux-image-686-pae
Version: OK
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of
How did you install linux-image-686-pae?
Which version of linux-image-686 do you have installed?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Design a system any fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 692996 OK
Bug #692996 [linux-image-686-pae] linux-image-686-pae does not boot on pentum m
of ibm r50p thinkpad
There is no source info for the package 'linux-image-686-pae' at version 'OK'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source
Forwarded Message
From: Karsten Suehring suehringb...@gmail.com
To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Subject: Re: Bug#692957: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: NFS server causes high load
on 3.2 kernel
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:58:11 +0100
I don't think load figures from a
[Please reply-to-all, so your messages are logged on the bug report.]
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 22:58 +0100, Karsten Suehring wrote:
[...]
I was running the bug report tool on the actual server VM and just
checked the version and performance numbers again.
root@debian-server:~# uname -a
Linux
Is that with TCP or UDP?
Made a simple mount without specifying any options. So I guess the default
would be TCP because specifying UDP made a difference in previous tests,
right?
--Karsten
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: dajh...@vanadac.com
I sent this to the debian-kernel list just over a week ago and haven't
received a response. Accordingly, I'm filing it as a bug report. I
hope I'm following appropriate procedure.
GRUB 2.00 has support
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 23:38 +0100, Karsten Suehring wrote:
Is that with TCP or UDP?
Made a simple mount without specifying any options. So I guess the
default would be TCP because specifying UDP made a difference in
previous tests, right?
Yes, TCP is the default.
Can you also
Can you also measure the speed at which the client can write, when the
server is running each of the two kernel versions? If the client can
write twice as fast (for example) then it should be OK to use twice as
high a percentage of CPU time on the server, as the total CPU time
needed for a
Thanks for the explanation, ben. fwiw, i should have noted that this
machine has snd-powermac in /etc/modules.
when i remove snd-powermac from /etc/modules and reboot the machine, it
boots fine into 3.6-trunk-powerpc.
then, doing a modprobe -v snd-powermac causes the same crash. So that
module
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 01:30 +0100, Karsten Suehring wrote:
Can you also measure the speed at which the client can write,
when the
server is running each of the two kernel versions? If the
client can
write twice as fast (for example) then it should be
Forwarded Message
From: linuxh...@freenet.de linuxh...@freenet.de
To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Subject: Re: Bug#692996: linux-image-686-pae does not boot on pentum m of ibm
r50p thinkpad
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:14:14 -0200
Hello Ben,
i upgraded the default of the
Forwarded Message
From: linuxh...@freenet.de linuxh...@freenet.de
To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Subject: Re: Bug#692996: linux-image-686-pae does not boot on pentum m of ibm
r50p thinkpad
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:16:26 -0200
Sorry forgot
Error Message PAE Kernel
[Please reply-to-all so that your messages are logged on the bug
report.]
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 07:14 -0200, linuxh...@freenet.de wrote:
Hello Ben,
i upgraded the default of the wheezy-testing channel current
version (squeeze-wheezy upgrade) now i must use the
squeeze kernel 2.6 default on
Il 11/11/2012 10:40, Jonathan Nieder ha scritto:
Leonardo Favario wrote:
I don't have this machine anymore but if I remember correctly the
problem was fixed starting from kernel 2.6.38.
That's good to hear. Do you mind if I forward this information to the
bug log?
No problem, it's legit.
20 matches
Mail list logo
