Bug#705635: found 705635 in 3.2.41-2+deb7u2

2013-05-30 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Hi folks, this was hitting me quite hard with 3.2.41-2+deb7u2. I had four hang ups yesterday. lowriter 1:4.0.3-3 seemed to be the most reliable way to trigger the bug (under gnome-shell 3.4.2-7). So far 3.8-2-amd64 seems fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#709616: floods the network with pause packets

2013-05-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 26/05/2013 18:10, Ben Hutchings a écrit : OK, so the switch is indeed defective: it says it can handle pause frames, but it can't. The problem happened on (at least) two different switches from different manufacturers (Transtec and Netgear). FWIW, the problem just happened on another

Processed: Re: Bug#710023: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Bug #710023 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working The source 'linux' and version 'linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as

Bug#709616: floods the network with pause packets

2013-05-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 11:21 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 26/05/2013 18:10, Ben Hutchings a écrit : OK, so the switch is indeed defective: it says it can handle pause frames, but it can't. The problem happened on (at least) two different switches from different manufacturers (Transtec

Bug#709616: floods the network with pause packets

2013-05-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 30/05/2013 14:58, Ben Hutchings a écrit : Could you check whether the switch is also sending pause frames back to the port that's generating them? How exactly do I do that? Is disconnecting the faulty computer and connecting my laptop in its place right? ethtool -S eth0 | grep

Bug#709625: protected_hardlinks is too broad - make it per-filesystem instead?

2013-05-30 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:31:03AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 15:30 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: Alternatively, I'm pondering: if the main thrust of the hardlink protection is to prevent attacks against system files, then it might make more sense to change

Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Bug #710023 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working The source 'linux' and version 'linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64' do not appear to match any binary packages No

Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64

2013-05-30 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Hum...this is not clear why this is notfound. Anyway I am attaching the .ko triggering this issue. This seems

Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64

2013-05-30 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Hum...this is not clear why this is

Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64

2013-05-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:10:20PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Hum...this is not clear why this is

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:linux

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

[bts-link] source package src:linux

2013-05-30 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #684186 (http://bugs.debian.org/684186) # Bug title: Kernel doesn't produce any

Bug#710430: kernel fails to boot with Radeon 9250 PCI

2013-05-30 Thread James Dietrich
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 Upon completing the initial install of Wheezy, I rebooted and discovered that the kernel fails to boot. My video card is a Radeon 9250 PCI 256MB. After the grub menu, a few lines are printed, the last one being Waiting for /dev to be

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2013-05-30 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #572537 (http://bugs.debian.org/572537) # Bug title: udev spins on drm device # *

Bug#710430: kernel fails to boot with Radeon 9250 PCI

2013-05-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58981 On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:59:36PM -0400, James Dietrich wrote: [...] Using git I downloaded the kernel repository and discovered that this machine could boot fine with KMS enabled in 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, but not since then.

Processed: Re: Bug#710430: kernel fails to boot with Radeon 9250 PCI

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58981 Bug #710430 [linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64] kernel fails to boot with Radeon 9250 PCI Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58981'. -- 710430:

Bug#709647: linux-source-3.2: USB 1.1 no longer works

2013-05-30 Thread Bjarni Ingi Gislason
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:47:54PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:48:52PM +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Control: tag -1 moreinfo Does enabling CONFIG_ACPI fix it? No. The computer

Bug#709647: linux-source-3.2: USB 1.1 no longer works

2013-05-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
Now I see this is a rather old computer (BIOS dated 1999), so I'm not so surprised that ACPI is not supported! Does the kernel in linux-image-3.2.0-4-486 work? Can you send a boot log and output of 'lspci -s :01.2' from a working kernel (old or new)? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If at first you

Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64

2013-05-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: reassign -1 binutils-gold 2.20.1-16 Control: fixed -1 2.22-8 Control: affects -1 linux On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 16:38 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: Re: Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: reassign -1 binutils-gold 2.20.1-16 Bug #710023 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'binutils-gold'. No longer marked as found in versions linux/3.2.41-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1.

Uploading linux (3.9.4-1)

2013-05-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 14:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:09 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:03:42AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: There can be no more uploads to unstable for wheezy, so I propose to rename sid - wheezy for each package that

Processed: tagging 704750

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 704750 + pending Bug #704750 [src:linux] src:linux: Please enable Yama LSM Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 704750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704750

Processed: tagging 708336

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708336 + pending Bug #708336 [src:linux] linux: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing module tms380tr Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708336:

Processed: tagging 708662

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708662 + pending Bug #708662 [src:linux] linux: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to duplicate module llc at kernel-wedge Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #708662 to the same tags previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: tagging 704129

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 704129 + pending Bug #704129 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: please add support for AX88179 USB 3.0 ethernet adapters Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 704129:

Processed: tagging 708348

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708348 + pending Bug #708348 [linux] linux: Please enable CONFIG_RTL8723AE=m Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708348:

Processed: tagging 701777

2013-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 701777 + pending Bug #701777 [src:linux] please enable AR5523 for kernel = 3.8 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 701777: