On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 16:09 +0100, D. F. wrote:
Hello,
Julien Tinnes from google says that next releases of chromium will
drops support for kernels without TSYNC
ubuntu 14.10 already has been patched
Can I to expect that debian 8/jessie will have support for TSYNC?
Sounds like another
On 03/07/2015 06:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 16:09 +0100, D. F. wrote:
Hello, Julien Tinnes from google says that next releases of
chromium will drops support for kernels without TSYNC
ubuntu 14.10 already has been patched
Can I to expect that debian 8/jessie will
Hi Emil,
Am Samstag 07 März 2015, 14:26:17 schrieb Emil Goode:
Just to clarify, suspend/resume is working but it takes more than 60 sec for
suspend to complete?
yes, suspend/resume is working. I did three cycles and measured the time for
suspend:
The first suspend took approx. 60 seconds,
Hello,
Julien Tinnes from google says that next releases of chromium will drops
support for kernels without TSYNC
ubuntu 14.10 already has been patched
Can I to expect that debian 8/jessie will have support for TSYNC?
thanks
Hi,
I've just experienced this with my kerberized (krb5p) NFSv4 mounts, too.
The workaround I used was to copy the generated unit files from
/run/systemd/generator/${mountname}.mount to /etc/systemd/system/ and
add a line to the [Unit] section:
After=nfs-common.service
Since custom unit
Hello Rainer,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 06:47:31PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hi Emil,
Am Samstag 07 März 2015, 14:26:17 schrieb Emil Goode:
Just to clarify, suspend/resume is working but it takes more than 60 sec for
suspend to complete?
yes, suspend/resume is working. I did three
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 07:17:13PM +0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
On 03/07/2015 06:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 16:09 +0100, D. F. wrote:
Hello, Julien Tinnes from google says that next releases of
chromium will drops support for kernels without TSYNC
ubuntu 14.10
Come on guys, there's no spyware in chromium. You can look through the
source for yourself and see all the places where it isn't.
Returning to the topic at hand, this seems like a simple enough feature and
fairly non-intrusive. Can anybody see a reason not to apply the patch?
linux_3.2.65-1+deb7u2~bpo60+1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_3.2.65-1+deb7u2~bpo60+1.dsc
linux_3.2.65-1+deb7u2~bpo60+1.debian.tar.xz
linux-support-3.2.0-0.bpo.4_3.2.65-1+deb7u2~bpo60+1_all.deb
linux-doc-3.2_3.2.65-1+deb7u2~bpo60+1_all.deb
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 05:08 +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Come on guys, there's no spyware in chromium. You can look through the
source for yourself and see all the places where it isn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome#User_tracking
Returning to the topic at hand, this seems like
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 20:39:23 +
Source: linux
Binary: linux-source-3.2 linux-doc-3.2 linux-manual-3.2
linux-support-3.2.0-0.bpo.4 linux-libc-dev linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-all
linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-all-alpha
11 matches
Mail list logo
