Re: armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size)

2018-03-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:21 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting Ben Hutchings: >> >> Still, as armel will not be a release architecture any more, I suppose >> it can diverge further from the normal configuration. > > I didn't know, that this already has been decided. > Could you point to the em

Re: D-Link DNS-323 support dropped in Debian stretch

2018-03-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Roger Shimizu [2018-03-26 19:36]: > So I want to know how many active users for D-Link DNS and QNAP devices now? I don't think there were ever many DNS-323 users. QNAP has an active user base but the hardware is aging, so I think they will be able to cope without buster (especially if LTS stre

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

2018-03-27 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> I can answer this part: yes, you can definitely put an Intel wifi card >> in the mini-pcie slot of an ARM box. > This means that, in principle, we should enable many modules more to get > as full support as desired in Debian on each and every arch... My point wasn't just that it's technically p

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

2018-03-27 Thread Rogério Brito
On 2018-03-27 17:29, Rick Thomas wrote: > On Mar 27, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: >> As a related subject, I could compile a more stripped down version of >> the armel kernel, put it for people to download and ask people to >> comment if it works for them, so that we can gauge what peopl

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

2018-03-27 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Ben and others following the discussion. On 2018-03-27 16:01, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 02:30 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > [...] I will see if all the modules make sense for an embedded system like this and I will send a list of options for opinions by others... >

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

2018-03-27 Thread Rick Thomas
On Mar 27, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: > As a related subject, I could compile a more stripped down version of > the armel kernel, put it for people to download and ask people to > comment if it works for them, so that we can gauge what people actually > need from such a kernel... Ple

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

2018-03-27 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi,Stefan. On 2018-03-27 09:34, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Similarly for wifi cards like those Intel ones like iwlwifi (which is >> the one that I have in this Core 2 Duo here)... > > I can answer this part: yes, you can definitely put an Intel wifi card > in the mini-pcie slot of an ARM box. Yes,

armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size)

2018-03-27 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting Ben Hutchings : Still, as armel will not be a release architecture any more, I suppose it can diverge further from the normal configuration. I didn't know, that this already has been decided. Could you point to the emails about this? Thanks!

Re: armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size)

2018-03-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 21:21 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting Ben Hutchings : > > Still, as armel will not be a release architecture any more, I > > suppose > > it can diverge further from the normal configuration. > > I didn't know, that this already has been decided. > Could you point to

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

2018-03-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 02:30 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: [...] > > > I will see if all the modules make sense for an embedded system like this > > > and I will send a list of options for opinions by others... > > > > [...] > > > > As I see it, the point of installing Debian on little NAS boxes is

Re: D-Link DNS-323 support dropped in Debian stretch

2018-03-27 Thread Aaro Koskinen
Hi, On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 07:36:26PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > There's one possibility that can bring back qnap, or even D-Link DNS device: > - create a new flavour for armel, such as armel-none-mini > - the new flavour will disable many features that other common kernels > have, such as wir

Re: [PATCH v4] scripts/package/builddeb: split generating packaging and build

2018-03-27 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Riku, 2018-03-27 22:28 GMT+09:00 Riku Voipio : >> If I use GNU Make 4.2 >> >> $ cat deb_pkg_log.txt >> MAKEFLAGS for deb-pkg: rR -I/home/masahiro/ref/linux -j8 >> --jobserver-auth=3,4 --no-print-directory -- obj=scripts/package >> MAKEFLAGS for mkdebian internal: rR -I/home/masahiro/ref/linux -j

Fwd: [PATCH v4] scripts/package/builddeb: split generating packaging and build

2018-03-27 Thread Riku Voipio
resend, sorry forgot the mailing lists from last post. Hi Masahiro, On 27 March 2018 at 12:07, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2018-02-21 19:10 GMT+09:00 : >> From: Riku Voipio >> >> Move debian/ directory generation out of builddeb to a new script, >> mkdebian. The package build commands are kept in

Re: [PATCH v4] scripts/package/builddeb: split generating packaging and build

2018-03-27 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Riku, 2018-02-21 19:10 GMT+09:00 : > From: Riku Voipio > > Move debian/ directory generation out of builddeb to a new script, > mkdebian. The package build commands are kept in builddeb, which > is now an internal command called from debian/rules. > > With these changes in place, we can now