Bug#1016718: binfmt_elf: May fail to load executable with no static data next to BSS

2022-08-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
Source: linux Version: 5.19-1~exp1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream I'm doing some test builds of klibc and found a regression for arm64. What changed is binutils, and I've reported bug #1016717 there, but it seems to be triggering an existing

Processed: Re: Bug#1016586: bpftool: Dump of jited version of the BPF program requires libbfd support

2022-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 wontfix Bug #1016586 [bpftool] bpftool: Dump of jited version of the BPF program requires libbfd support Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 1016586: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016586 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1016586: bpftool: Dump of jited version of the BPF program requires libbfd support

2022-08-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 wontfix On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 18:01 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: [...] > I suppose that the support for BPF must be add to libbfd in the binutils-dev > package by default. > > Feel free to ask for more details if I was not clear in my report. We don't and can't link with

Processed: notfound 1016548 in linux/5.19~rc6+1~exp1

2022-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1016548 linux/5.19~rc6+1~exp1 Bug #1016548 [src:linux] linux-image-5.19.0-rc6-amd64: Corrupted cursor and broken resume with amdgpu driver with Radeon RX 6600 The source linux and version 5.19~rc6+1~exp1 do not appear to match any

Processed: reassign 1016548 to src:linux, found 1016548 in linux/5.19~rc6+1~exp1 ...

2022-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1016548 src:linux 5.19~rc6+1~exp1 Bug #1016548 [src:linux] linux-image-5.19.0-rc6-amd64: Corrupted cursor and broken resume with amdgpu driver with Radeon RX 6600 Ignoring request to reassign bug #1016548 to the same package Bug

Processed: reassign 1016548 to src:linux, found 1016548 in linux-signed-amd64/5.19~rc6+1~exp1

2022-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1016548 src:linux 5.19~rc6+1~exp1 Bug #1016548 [linux-image-5.19.0-rc6-amd64] linux-image-5.19.0-rc6-amd64: Corrupted cursor and broken resume with amdgpu driver with Radeon RX 6600 Warning: Unknown package

linux_5.10.127-2~bpo10+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports

2022-08-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 19:09:22 +0200 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 5.10.127-2~bpo10+1 Distribution: buster-backports Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Ben Hutchings Changes: linux

linux_5.18.14-1~bpo11+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into bullseye-backports, bullseye-backports

2022-08-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:10:03 +0200 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 5.18.14-1~bpo11+1 Distribution: bullseye-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Ben Hutchings Closes: 825141

Re: Asahi Linux Support - any plans?

2022-08-05 Thread Andrew Worsley
I believe the Asahi team has them all submitted via the various relevant maintainers and they are working their way through the groups. Some patches make significant changes and there is obviously discussion about whether they need to be reworked before being passed up. That said there was this

Re: Asahi Linux Support - any plans?

2022-08-05 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 11:36:40AM +1000, Andrew Worsley wrote: > Thanks Diederik, so I'm guessing 173 is way too much but a lot of it might > not > be critical to something running on the M1 (versus M2). > > If I was to find a smaller set of say 10 patches to 5.19 that booted a > usable > system