Hi Bernhard,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 12:21:48PM +, Bernhard wrote:
> Hello Salvatore
>
> It is possible, that kernel 6.0.11 solves the Bug #1021391 because of
>
> >>>
> - [arm64,armhf] bus: sunxi-rsb: Remove the shutdown callback
> - [arm64,armhf] bus: sunxi-rsb: Support atomic
Control: retitle -1 Please add brcmfmac43456-sdio.* files as it's not just used
in RPi devices
On 10 Nov 2022 11:40:06 +0100 Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 17:52:00 -0500 Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Please note I'm currenlty shipping the required files in
> > raspi-firmware -- I
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Please add brcmfmac43456-sdio.* files as it's not just used in RPi
> devices
Bug #999485 [firmware-brcm80211] firmware-brcm80211: Please add
brcmfmac43456-sdio.* files for wifi support in Raspberry p400
Changed Bug title to 'Please add
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1013330 [src:linux] linux-image-5.18.0-0.bpo.1-arm64: kernel panic in
dpaa2_eth_free_tx_fd
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1013330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013330
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On woensdag 22 juni 2022 00:20:22 CET you wrote:
> Kernel 5.18.3 contains (at least) 2 patches related to dpaa2-eth.
> Kernel 5.18.5-1 (currently in Sid) does contain quite a few fixes vs 5.18.2,
> so it would be useful to verify if that fixes your issue. I don't know
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1013180 [src:linux] linux-image-5.18.0-1-amd64: System doesn't go to sleep
in 5.18.0-1 kernel
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1013180 to the same tags previously set
--
1013180: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013180
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On 5 Jul 2022 18:21:27 +0500 Alexandr Podgorniy wrote:
> I tried 5.18.0-2-amd64 kernel recently and noticed that it doesn't go to
> sleep when Bluetooth mouse connected. Otherwise it's fine. Not tried
> 5.18.5 yet.
FTR: 5.18.5 is 5.18.0-2 and if that didn't fix it,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1013180 [src:linux] linux-image-5.18.0-1-amd64: System doesn't go to sleep
in 5.18.0-1 kernel
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1013180: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Your message dated Mon, 05 Dec 2022 19:03:07 +0100
with message-id <3405942.QJadu78ljV@bagend>
and subject line Re: Bug#1012210: linux-image-5.10.0-14-amd64: Kernels of
Bullseye and Testing (5.10 and 5.17) hang at boot
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012306,
regarding
❦ 24 avril 2021 16:15 +02, Salvatore Bonaccorso:
Is this still something we should consider, or can the bug be closed?
I suppose that's since almost nobody chimes in in all these years, there
is no need.
Now that 989153 and 989181 have been merged into this one and the bug is
reopened,
On 12/5/22 18:26, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Do you know what the faulty and fixed 5.10 version were/are?
The problem was not really in the kernel, but in rpc.svcgssd that has trouble
with large Kerberos credentials.
The only problem with 5.10 kernels is that they only display warnings about
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 18:52:44 CET Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Now that 989153 and 989181 have been merged into this one and the bug is
> reopened, then the next question becomes: how to proceed.
Ping?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday, 5 December 2022 18:03:57 CET Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> On 12/5/22 17:34, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > btw: What's the reason for not using a 5.10 kernel on a Stable system?
> > (Not that I mind, just curious)
>
> I had a NFS problem with the 5.10 kernel and tested a more recent kernel to
On 12/5/22 17:34, Diederik de Haas wrote:
btw: What's the reason for not using a 5.10 kernel on a Stable system?
(Not that I mind, just curious)
Thanks for your interest :>.
I had a NFS problem with the 5.10 kernel and tested a more recent kernel to see
if this problem had been fixed.
(For
Processing control commands:
> found -1 5.16.12-1~bpo11+1
Bug #1011148 [src:linux] SATA hotplug on AMD x570 MB broken since 5.10.0-10
Marked as found in versions linux/5.16.12-1~bpo11+1.
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1011148 [src:linux] SATA hotplug on AMD x570 MB broken since 5.10.0-10
Added tag(s)
Control: found -1 5.16.12-1~bpo11+1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tuesday, 17 May 2022 15:25:29 CET Bob wrote:
> This behavior is still exibited by ... 5.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 from backports
Updated bug with that info.
Does this problem still occur with the latest 5.10 version and/or the latest
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Wednesday, 30 March 2022 19:49:03 CET Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> For now it seems to run fine even with this warning (no user complained).
>
> Additionally, I am not sure if the problem will occur again and how often.
> I will reboot the system, monitor it and update
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1008681 [src:linux] linux-image-5.16.0-5-amd64: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1061
at fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:5891 nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op+0x600/0x690 [nfsd]
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1008681: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008681
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 mdadm --examine in chroot without /dev mounted corrupts host's
> filesystem
Bug #982459 [src:linux] mdadm --examine in chroot without /proc,/dev,/sys
mounted corrupts host's filesystem
Changed Bug title to 'mdadm --examine in chroot without /dev mounted
Control: retitle -1 mdadm --examine in chroot without /dev mounted corrupts
host's filesystem
Control: found -1 5.10.127-2
Control: fixed -1 5.18.2-1~bpo11+1
On Tuesday, 2 August 2022 11:03:09 CET Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux
On 10 Feb 2021 14:29:52 +0100 Patrick
Hello Salvatore
It is possible, that kernel 6.0.11 solves the Bug #1021391 because of
>>>
- [arm64,armhf] bus: sunxi-rsb: Remove the shutdown callback
- [arm64,armhf] bus: sunxi-rsb: Support atomic transfers
<<<
If i have a look at the ARM kernel mailinglist, there are bugfixes for this
Package: firmware-linux
Version: 20210315-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: teodoro777.coluc...@live.com
Dear Maintainer,
I'm trying to install Debian Stable on an msi pulse gl76 equipped with an i7
12700h and an Nvidia 3060 laptop.
The problem is that neither video card seems to
Your message dated Mon, 05 Dec 2022 09:35:28 +0100
with message-id <12108978.O9o76ZdvQC@bagend>
and subject line Re: Bug#900821: Found working and failing 5.10 versions and
got kernel crash, report from BSP Tilburg (https://deb.li/iiOID)
has caused the Debian Bug report #900821,
regarding apache
23 matches
Mail list logo
