Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread M. Zhou
On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 04:35 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 25/09/2023 00.50, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Already built modules remain until someone deletes it.  So you can > > also > > switch back to the still installed older kernel version and it will > > have > > the still working module

Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 25/09/2023 00.50, Bastian Blank wrote: Already built modules remain until someone deletes it. So you can also switch back to the still installed older kernel version and it will have the still working module available. This is what I expect not to work. Assume I have Linux 6.6 and a

Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi Ben On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 06:05:09PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 15:01 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > The same upstream version in testing and backports will have the same > > package name. > This is not OK, because they will be incompatible on architectures >

Bug#1052584: linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64: NFS4 stopped working in 6.5 with SELinux error

2023-09-24 Thread Michal Kaspar
Package: src:linux Version: 6.5.3-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, After upgrading to kernel version 6.5.0-1-amd64, the NFS4 stopped working on the station. Whe trying to mount nf4 FS, the mount fails with error: mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified for The kernel log contains

Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi Andreas On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:10:36PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 24/09/2023 15.01, Bastian Blank wrote: > > ## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key > > > > The modules will not longer be signed using the Secure Boot CA like the > > EFI kernel image itself.

Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 24/09/2023 15.01, Bastian Blank wrote: ## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key The modules will not longer be signed using the Secure Boot CA like the EFI kernel image itself. Instead a key will be created during the build and thrown away after. Do I correctly assume that

Bug#1052554: Acknowledgement (linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64: amdgpu crashes)

2023-09-24 Thread Florian Reichl
I don't have this bug when booting kernel 6.4.13-1 (2023-08-31). It looks like I have a problem as described here: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/756281/kernel-6-5-2-seems-to-have-amdgpu-crash-on-no-retry-page-fault Thank you! Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb am So., 24. Sept.

Bug#1052472: linux-image-6.5.0-1-powerpc64: Can't run program if its executable file was made immutable via chattr(1)

2023-09-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: reassign -1 src:zfs-linux On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 16:13 +, WHR wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 6.5.3-1 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: msl023...@gmail.com, msl023...@gmail.com > > > Taking executable file /usr/bin/ssh to demonstrate the issue: > > # which ssh

Processed: Re: Bug#1052472: linux-image-6.5.0-1-powerpc64: Can't run program if its executable file was made immutable via chattr(1)

2023-09-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:zfs-linux Bug #1052472 [src:linux] linux-image-6.5.0-1-powerpc64: Can't run program if its executable file was made immutable via chattr(1) Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'src:zfs-linux'. No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#1052554: linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64: amdgpu crashes

2023-09-24 Thread Florian Reichl
Package: src:linux Version: 6.5.3-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: flor...@reichl.net Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Booting the new kernel and surfing the web using Google Chrome. After some more complex pages the screen shows unusual things and mouse and keyboard are

Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 15:01 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: [...] > ## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key > > The modules will not longer be signed using the Secure Boot CA like the > EFI kernel image itself. Instead a key will be created during the build > and thrown away after. >

Bug#1050256: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#1050256: autopkgtest fails on debci

2023-09-24 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 07:17 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 12:01:37PM +0530, intrigeri wrote: > > In the last month or so, a number of people from various Debian teams > > and other distributions have been tracking down a regression that > > affects systems upgraded

Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks Debian currently does Secure Boot signing using a shim chained to the Microsoft key. This use requires that we follow certain rules. And one of the recent changes to those rules state that our method of signing kernel modules also with the same key will not be allowed anymore. Some

Bug#1025845: linux: please enable CONFIG_KFENCE

2023-09-24 Thread Raymundo Gonzalez
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:14:39 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_G=C3=B6ttsche?= < cgzo...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Source: linux > Version: 6.0.12-1 > Tags: security > > Please enable support for Kernel Electric-Fence (KFENCE), a memory > safety error detector, see >

Processed: Re: fixed 1042503 6.5.0-1

2023-09-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1042503 6.5.3-1 Bug #1042503 [src:linux] linux-image-6.4.0-1-amd64: grafic performance regression with kernel 6.4 Marked as fixed in versions linux/6.5.3-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: fixed 1042503 6.5.0-1

2023-09-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1042503 6.5.0-1 Bug #1042503 [src:linux] linux-image-6.4.0-1-amd64: grafic performance regression with kernel 6.4 The source 'linux' and version '6.5.0-1' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions