Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

2024-01-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024, at 23:07, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi > > With Linux 6.6 we dropped the Marvell specific kernel image, as it > was not known to work on any of the available devices. We still have > another armel kernel left, the one of the Raspberry Pi 0 and 1, which > uses an ARMv6 CPU. > >

linux-signed-arm64_6.7+1~exp1_source.changes is NEW

2024-01-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Mapping rc-buggy to experimental. binary:ata-modules-6.7-arm64-di is NEW. binary:btrfs-modules-6.7-arm64-di is NEW. binary:cdrom-core-modules-6.7-arm64-di is NEW. binary:crc-modules-6.7-arm64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-dm-modules-6.7-arm64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-modules-6.7-arm64-di is NEW.

linux-signed-amd64_6.7+1~exp1_source.changes is NEW

2024-01-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Mapping rc-buggy to experimental. binary:acpi-modules-6.7-amd64-di is NEW. binary:ata-modules-6.7-amd64-di is NEW. binary:btrfs-modules-6.7-amd64-di is NEW. binary:cdrom-core-modules-6.7-amd64-di is NEW. binary:crc-modules-6.7-amd64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-dm-modules-6.7-amd64-di is NEW.

linux-signed-amd64_4.19.304+1_source.changes REJECTED

2024-01-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
The suite "oldoldstable-proposed-updates" does not accept source uploads. Mapping oldoldstable-security to oldoldstable-proposed-updates. binary:acpi-modules-4.19.0-26-amd64-di is NEW. binary:ata-modules-4.19.0-26-amd64-di is NEW. binary:btrfs-modules-4.19.0-26-amd64-di is NEW.

Processing of linux-signed-amd64_6.7+1~exp1_source.changes

2024-01-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux-signed-amd64_6.7+1~exp1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-signed-amd64_6.7+1~exp1.dsc linux-signed-amd64_6.7+1~exp1.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processing of linux-signed-arm64_6.7+1~exp1_source.changes

2024-01-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux-signed-arm64_6.7+1~exp1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-signed-arm64_6.7+1~exp1.dsc linux-signed-arm64_6.7+1~exp1.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processed: Re: Bug#1060336: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/klibc-utils: cp: warning: behavior of -n is non-portable and may change in future; use --update=none instead

2024-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1055694 1060336 Bug #1055694 [klibc-utils] initramfs-tools: After updating coreutils cp: not replacing in console when running update-initramfs Bug #1056912 [klibc-utils] initramfs-tools: update-initramfs - can't generate initramfs

Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

2024-01-09 Thread Martin
On 2024-01-09 19:56, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > though. Any armel users out there? :-) My employer uses Debian on armel, but not d-i :-)

Bug#934736: initramfs-tools: MODULES=dep fails when rootfs is zfs

2024-01-09 Thread наб
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.142 Followup-For: Bug #934736 Dear Maintainer, Fresh installation, just pivoted to root-on-zfs. I did answer "minimal" or whatever in the d-i prompt. Just got hit with -- >8 -- $ sudo update-initramfs -u update-initramfs: Generating

Bug#1060336: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/klibc-utils: cp: warning: behavior of -n is non-portable and may change in future; use --update=none instead

2024-01-09 Thread наб
Package: klibc-utils Version: 2.0.13-2 Severity: normal File: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/klibc-utils Dear Maintainer, On a rebuild I just got W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/mtl_guc_70.bin for module i915 cp: warning: behavior of -n is non-portable and may change in

Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

2024-01-09 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Bastian, On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 11:07:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Do we have any armel subarch that can be installed via d-i? Not as far as I know, perhaps Sledge has more info on this? Also, I don't think we've seen anyone mentioning armel in ages on debian-boot, both in terms of

Bug#1060052: confirmed :-(

2024-01-09 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
Hi, with our home directories mounted as cifs shares, we are hit by this issue quite hard: People can't login (because sddm is missing the home directory) or it takes ages (or ~20 min if you are patient) until the KDE plasma desktop gets usable. It doesn't seem to be always triggered, but in

Bug#1060322: panic on poweroff

2024-01-09 Thread Benjamin Moody
> This happens with linux-image-5.10.0-26-amd64 (5.10.197-1). > It does not happen with linux-image-5.10.0-27-amd64 (5.10.205-2). Sorry, I of course meant to say the problem does *not* occur in 5.10.0-26. It is a regression in 5.10.0-27. Benjamin

Bug#1060322: linux-image-5.10.0-27-amd64: Panic on poweroff after upgrade from 5.10.0-26 to 5.10.0-27

2024-01-09 Thread Benjamin Moody
Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.205-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: benjamin.mo...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, When I shut the machine down, it hits what looks like a kernel panic. This happens with linux-image-5.10.0-26-amd64 (5.10.197-1). It does not happen with linux-image-5.10.0-27-amd64

linux-5.10_5.10.205-2~deb10u1_source.changes REJECTED

2024-01-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
The suite "oldoldstable-proposed-updates" does not accept source uploads. Mapping oldoldstable-security to oldoldstable-proposed-updates. binary:linux-headers-5.10.0-0.deb10.27-4kc-malta is NEW. binary:linux-headers-5.10.0-0.deb10.27-5kc-malta is NEW. binary:linux-headers-5.10.0-0.deb10.27-686

linux_4.19.304-1_source.changes REJECTED

2024-01-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
The suite "oldoldstable-proposed-updates" does not accept source uploads. Mapping oldoldstable-security to oldoldstable-proposed-updates. binary:affs-modules-4.19.0-26-4kc-malta-di is NEW. binary:affs-modules-4.19.0-26-5kc-malta-di is NEW. binary:affs-modules-4.19.0-26-loongson-3-di is NEW.

linux_6.7-1~exp1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2024-01-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 22:51:34 +0100 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 6.7-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By:

Bug#1059765: marked as done (linux: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails for multiple reasons)

2024-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:10:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1059765: fixed in linux 6.7-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1059765, regarding linux: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails for multiple reasons to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1059713: marked as done (linux-image-6.6.8-amd64-dbg: vmlinux-6.6.8-amd64 is stripped)

2024-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:10:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1059713: fixed in linux 6.7-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1059713, regarding linux-image-6.6.8-amd64-dbg: vmlinux-6.6.8-amd64 is stripped to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1059676: marked as done (kernel FTBFS on hppa)

2024-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:10:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1059676: fixed in linux 6.7-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1059676, regarding kernel FTBFS on hppa to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1050315: marked as done (Please include sun8i-drm-hdmi module in installer)

2024-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:10:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1050315: fixed in linux 6.7-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1050315, regarding Please include sun8i-drm-hdmi module in installer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has