Bug#1069077:

2024-04-15 Thread Forest
Control: retitle es8316 driver causes kernel oops / panic on rockpro64 Blacklisting the snd_soc_es8316 module in /etc/modprobe.d seems to restore kernel stability, as far as I have seen from half a dozen reboots.

Bug#1069077: rockpro64: multiple kernel oops and frequent boot failures

2024-04-15 Thread Forest
Package: src:linux Version: 6.7.9-2 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: fores...@sonic.net Dear Maintainer, The current debian unstable kernel causes a variety of failures that are not present in the bookworm kernel, on the RockPro64 single board computer. (This is an arm64 machine built upon the

Bug#1068770: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local privilege escalation vulnerability in kernel n_gsm driver)

2024-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:47:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068770: fixed in linux 6.1.85-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068770, regarding linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: Local privilege escalation vulnerability in kernel n_gsm driver to be marked as done. This

Bug#1068675: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2))

2024-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:47:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068675: fixed in linux 6.1.85-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068675, regarding linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1065320: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: 6.1.0-18 kernel enters ACPI Error loop during boot & requires power cycle)

2024-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:47:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065320: fixed in linux 6.1.85-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065320, regarding linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: 6.1.0-18 kernel enters ACPI Error loop during boot & requires power cycle to be marked as

linux-signed-i386_6.1.85+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

2024-04-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:17:03 +0200 Source: linux-signed-i386 Architecture: source Version: 6.1.85+1 Distribution: bookworm-security Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team

linux-signed-arm64_6.1.85+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

2024-04-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:17:03 +0200 Source: linux-signed-arm64 Architecture: source Version: 6.1.85+1 Distribution: bookworm-security Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team

linux-signed-amd64_6.1.85+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

2024-04-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:17:03 +0200 Source: linux-signed-amd64 Architecture: source Version: 6.1.85+1 Distribution: bookworm-security Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team

linux_6.1.85-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

2024-04-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:17:03 +0200 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 6.1.85-1 Distribution: bookworm-security Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By:

Kernel config change to make MSI laptop touchpad work

2024-04-15 Thread phil davis
Hello Debian Kernel Maintainers, TL;DR: please enable CONFIG_PINCTRL_METEORLAKE=y in kernel config I recently bought an MSI laptop, Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Prestige 16 AI Studio B1VEG/MS-15A2, BIOS E15A2IMS.10A 01/29/2024 which uses Intel Meteor Lake Core Ultra CPU, which is

Re: Questions about 6.6 future kernel in Debian

2024-04-15 Thread Eric Valette
On 15/04/2024 11:32, Diederik de Haas wrote: On Monday, 15 April 2024 10:41:55 CEST Eric Valette wrote: Why is there no 6.6 up-to-date kernel pushed in testing as well? Do you plan to wait until 6.6 enter stable? When? Nothing gets 'pushed' to Testing. Packages *transition* to Testing when

Re: Questions about 6.6 future kernel in Debian

2024-04-15 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Monday, 15 April 2024 10:41:55 CEST Eric Valette wrote: > Why is there no 6.6 up-to-date kernel pushed in testing as well? Do you > plan to wait until 6.6 enter stable? When? Nothing gets 'pushed' to Testing. Packages *transition* to Testing when several conditions are met.

Questions about 6.6 future kernel in Debian

2024-04-15 Thread Eric Valette
apt-cache policy linux-image-amd64 linux-image-amd64:  Installé : 6.6.15-2  Candidat : 6.7.9-2 Table de version :     6.7.9-2 500    500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages *** 6.6.15-2 500    500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages