Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

2024-01-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024, at 23:54, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 08:34 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> Qemu versatilepb is probably the most accessible arm926 >> platform, though there are a couple of other armv5/v6 (ast2400, >> ast2500, pxa27x, raspi1ap)

Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

2024-01-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024, at 23:07, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi > > With Linux 6.6 we dropped the Marvell specific kernel image, as it > was not known to work on any of the available devices. We still have > another armel kernel left, the one of the Raspberry Pi 0 and 1, which > uses an ARMv6 CPU. > > Th

Re: [patch 09/14] tmpfs: disallow CONFIG_TMPFS_INODE64 on alpha

2021-02-10 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:17 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:39 AM Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > > I couldn't spot any and also gave the patch below a try and my system > > still boots without any errors. > > So, as far as I can tell it _should_ be ok to change this. > > So y

Re: bullseye-installer fails on Cubox-i due to networking issue

2020-12-24 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:38 PM Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to run the bullseye installer from > > http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/main/installer-armhf/current/ > images/netboot/SD-card-images/ > > on a cubox-i using a serial console today. > > It seems the network int

Re: [RFC, PATCH, v3.9] default exported asm symbols to zero

2016-12-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday, December 3, 2016 4:36:37 AM CET Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 13:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the > > final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC > >

Re: [RFC, PATCH, v3.9] default exported asm symbols to zero

2016-12-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday, December 2, 2016 1:59:15 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the > > 2.26? > > > final link, and a missing CRC for an export would le

Re: [PATCH] x86/kbuild: enable modversions for symbols exported from asm

2016-12-01 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:14:46 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > So quite frankly, I don't want to make our kernel sources worse due to > > broken shit tools getting something wrong that we shouldn't even care > > about. > > And

Re: [PATCH 21/21] ARM: Kirkwood: Remove DT support

2014-02-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 21 February 2014 02:00:27 Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:24 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:23 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > [...] > > > What i suspect we will end up doing it dropping the last patch for the > > > moment and ensuring ARCH_KIRKWOOD st

Re: [PATCH 21/21] ARM: Kirkwood: Remove DT support

2014-02-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 21 February 2014 01:47:31 Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 16:19 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 20 February 2014 14:21:10 Ian Campbell wrote: > > > For all I know, the only interesting ixp4xx platforms are the consumer > > products li

Re: [PATCH 21/21] ARM: Kirkwood: Remove DT support

2014-02-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 20 February 2014 14:21:10 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:53 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 20 February 2014 12:51:04 Ian Campbell wrote: > > * ixp4xx is too different from the others and I don't think it's > > possible t

Re: [PATCH 21/21] ARM: Kirkwood: Remove DT support

2014-02-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 20 February 2014 12:51:04 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 13:18 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:34:36AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > Debian has a single v7 flavour, armmp which uses the multi platform > stuff. (actually there is a second armmp-lpae,

Re: [PATCH 21/21] ARM: Kirkwood: Remove DT support

2014-02-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 20 February 2014 13:18:21 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > What this patchset does is also make mach-mvebu part of the multi v5 > kernel. So you just need one kernel for all ARM v5 machines which are > part of multi v5. The long term goal is that you need just two 32 ARM > kernels, multi v5 and

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 06 June 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: > So yes, Allwinner has an evil vendor tree (c), with a solution similar yet > inferior (because not generic enough) to the device tree, but they show > interest on going down the mainline road. Right, and of course there is nothing special about that

Re: trying to use virtio with the wheezy installer on arm versatile oops

2012-09-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 26 September 2012, Arnaud Patard wrote: > Torben Hohn writes: > > > i tried to use virtio inside qemu-system-arm emulating versatile. > > > > getting this kernel oops: > > > > [ 341.274760] pgd = cd818000 > > x > > [ 341.274940] [440004

Bug#340508: missing modules on s390/s390x (mkinitramfs for 2.6.14)

2005-12-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
Am Sonntag 04 Dezember 2005 16:31 schrieb Frans Pop: > Reason is that dasd_mod needs an option to tell it which dasd devices > should be used. I've written a script that creates a config file for > modprobe in /etc/modprobe.d/. > The script is a first approximation and probably needs cleaning up. >