Re: Status of this bug

2018-07-23 Thread David Goodenough
On Monday, 23 July 2018 14:30:06 BST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > This has happened so far: > > From the Debian side maxy added haveged as a sddm recommendation and as a > workaround. > > From the Qt side Thiago from upstream is trying to determine what changed in > the

Re: linux-image-3.14-2-armmp description out of date

2014-07-23 Thread David Goodenough
On Wednesday 23 July 2014 13:05:11 Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 09:31 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 20:50 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 20:18 +0100, David Goodenough wrote: In the above package the description reads

Re: Bug#659521: [3.1.8 - 3.2.4 regression] ATH9K driver will not connect to my adhoc network

2012-02-12 Thread David Goodenough
On Sunday 12 Feb 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Ankman wrote: This (attachment report.txt) will be from my currently booted kernel (3.1.0-1-686-pae) Thanks! That's fine. Forwarded to the bug log. [...] I solely rely on a script I wrote (key and essid were replaced by me), no

Bug#651747: linux-image-3.1.0-1-486: dist-upgrade requested linux-headers-3.1.0-1-486 for depmod, and that failed to install

2011-12-11 Thread David Goodenough
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.1.4-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I just did a dist-upgrade and this new version of linux image was installed. During the installation it complained when setting up the modules that linux-headers-3.1.0-1-486 be installed (I do not have the exact message as

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread David Goodenough
On Saturday 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. I think it is time to increase the minimum

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread David Goodenough
On Sunday 20 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 10:10 +, David Goodenough wrote: On Saturday 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread David Goodenough
On Sunday 20 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 19:43 +, David Goodenough wrote: On Sunday 20 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 10:10 +, David Goodenough wrote: On Saturday 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: The i386 architecture

Re: Dropping 686 non-pae kernel

2011-02-14 Thread David Goodenough
On Monday 14 February 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:23 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks I'd like to drop the i686 non-pae kernel. Currently we have sometimes -686 with PAE; only the normal kernel is without PAE. I'd like to get rid of this problem. Also this

Bug#585016: webcam not working

2010-06-08 Thread David Goodenough
On Tuesday 08 June 2010, Davi Diaz wrote: On Tuesday 08 June 2010 12:45:30 Bastian Blank wrote: severity 585016 minor tags 585016 moreinfo thanks Thank you for the information. But webcams are neither critical infrastructure nor does the logs show anything suspcicous. Yes, you are

Bug#572618: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686: missing config option CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL detected by hdparm -N

2010-03-15 Thread David Goodenough
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: Going back to your original report: On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:39 +, David Goodenough wrote: [...] Previous kernels (at least 2.6.26 which I used to run on this machine with Debian) did not seem to notice the HPA, so either I need a way

Bug#572618: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686: missing config option CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL detected by hdparm -N

2010-03-05 Thread David Goodenough
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-8 Severity: important My hard disk (a Samsumg HM160HC) seems to have a Host Protected Area, which previous kernels did not detect. So I have an area of the disk that currently I can not access, but are covered by the partition table. I read following Google

Bug#572618: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686: missing config option CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL detected by hdparm -N

2010-03-05 Thread David Goodenough
On Friday 05 March 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:39 +, David Goodenough wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-8 Severity: important My hard disk (a Samsumg HM160HC) seems to have a Host Protected Area, which previous kernels did not detect. So I have

Bug#571761: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686: 2.6.32 required noapic on Acer Travelmate 430 where earlier kernels did not

2010-02-27 Thread David Goodenough
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-8 Severity: important With kernels up to 2.6.26 this ancient machine did not require any special kernel boot options, but with 2.6.32 I need to add noapic to the kernel command in grub. If I do not add noapic the kernel gets as far as the pcmcia socket and

Re: looking for kernel-maintainer

2009-09-08 Thread David Goodenough
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: Dear maintainers, sorry to write here, but at the moment it is not possible, to register or send bugreports to bugzilla.kernel.org. Seems the mailsystem is completely down. So I even cannot send the message, that the mailservice is down,

Re: Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-25 Thread David Goodenough
On Monday 25 May 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: J.A. Bezemer cos...@wormhole.robuust.nl writes: On Sun, 24 May 2009, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). [..] Popcon

have the permissions changes on the kernel source

2007-02-16 Thread David Goodenough
Is it my imagination or have the group permissions on the linux kernel source as installed by apt-get source changed? The end result used to be that group src was assigned to the directory in /usr/src that received the source, but now it seems to be group root. This change seems to have happened

Re: Preparing 2.5.15-2

2006-01-09 Thread David Goodenough
On Sunday 08 January 2006 22:50, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hallo, On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:23:54PM +, David Goodenough wrote: Could you put in the change that was in the hostap-source since 2003 and is not in the in kernel version of hostap. Line 31 (a #define) is commented

Re: Preparing 2.5.15-2

2006-01-08 Thread David Goodenough
On Sunday 08 January 2006 21:03, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hello, I would like to propose a schedule for the next upload of linux-2.6 version 2.6.15-2: I would like to make the dinstall run on tuesday, so everything should be committed and tested until tuesday noontime UTC. Looking at the

PRISM2_NON_VOLATILE_DOWNLOAD in hostap.

2006-01-06 Thread David Goodenough
Recently the Hostap module was moved from being maintained outside the kernel to inside. The old hostap-source package had a fix in it to allow the module to download new firmware and flash it, but this never made it back into the upstream version because there are a few cards out there that do

Bug#251023: mkinitrd is already adapted to add the DSDT

2005-07-01 Thread David Goodenough
On Friday 01 July 2005 11:42, A Mennucc wrote: hi there I am very interested in patches for custom DSDT support (I own an ASUS notebook which has a broken DSDT, so ACPI suspend does not work; and there is a fixed DSDT in acpi.sf.net that I would love to try); I hope that they would accepted