Bug#597820: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: use a muxed resource lock for the Super I/O port

2010-10-09 Thread Giel van Schijndel
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 06:31:53AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 08:09:49AM -0400, Giel van Schijndel wrote: Sleep while acquiring a resource lock on the Super I/O port. This should prevent collisions from causing the hardware probe to fail with -EBUSY. Signed-off

Bug#597820: [PATCH] watchdog: f71808e_wdt: add support for the F71889FG

2010-10-04 Thread Giel van Schijndel
Signed-off-by: Giel van Schijndel m...@mortis.eu --- drivers/watchdog/Kconfig |4 ++-- drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c | 10 +- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig index 24efd8e..0fcbb87 100644

Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-04 Thread Giel van Schijndel
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 08:40:33 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 14:02:32 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:14:44 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote: [1] 1280669455-31283-1-git-send-email

Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-03 Thread Giel van Schijndel
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:14:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: I would also be interested in the watchdog

Bug#597820: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: use a muxed resource lock for the Super I/O port

2010-10-03 Thread Giel van Schijndel
Sleep while acquiring a resource lock on the Super I/O port. This should prevent collisions from causing the hardware probe to fail with -EBUSY. Signed-off-by: Giel van Schijndel m...@mortis.eu --- drivers/hwmon/f71882fg.c | 32 +++- 1 files changed, 19 insertions

Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-03 Thread Giel van Schijndel
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:33:23AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200

Bug#597820: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: f71882fg: use a muxed resource lock for the Super I/O port

2010-10-02 Thread Giel van Schijndel
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:38:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Ack! Acked-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com On 08/01/2010 03:30 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote: Sleep while acquiring a resource lock on the Super I/O port. This should prevent collisions from causing the hardware probe

Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-02 Thread Giel van Schijndel
[2] but not yet applied yet, I've just sent out a poke-mail (CC-ed to this bug) with the request for it to be committed. [1] 1280669455-31283-1-git-send-email...@mortis.eu [2] 4c59514a.7090...@redhat.com -- Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards, Giel van Schijndel -- Nine people can't make

Bug#597820: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32 doesn't support the f71889fg sensor chip

2010-10-02 Thread Giel van Schijndel
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:14:24AM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:36 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: I would also be interested in the watchdog support for the same chip, That patch does *not* add watchdog