Bug#600937: Please disable /etc/kernel postinst hook if the target kernel is non-modular

2010-10-21 Thread Guido Trotter
it for that case. Thanks, Guido From 9f638f2eabb49da543ca153f6649601630c7f478 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guido Trotter ultrot...@debian.org Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:58:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Don't try build initramfs on non-modular kernel If the kernel is build without modules support (for example

Bug#432971: Similar issue, but solved

2007-07-18 Thread Guido Trotter
I had a similar problem for 2.6.20 and 2.6.21, but it was solved for me in 2.6.22... Does this work for you too? Can this be closed? Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#423006: Bugs merged

2007-06-30 Thread Guido Trotter
Hi! I've reassigned the bug we had against xen to initramfs-tools, as it is, as reported, the same bug, and being a bug with the image generation we can't do anything on our side about it. Also I re-raised the severity to critical because, as stated by the severity description, this bug makes

Bug#401558: Possible explanation

2006-12-05 Thread Guido Trotter
Hi! What I found out is that the debian ipw3945-modules-* package (made by kernel-package with make-kpkg) distributes the /etc/modprobe.d/ipw3945-modules file while ipw3945d distributes /etc/modprobe.d/ipw3945d which both start the daemon. This might be the cause of the problem. I suggest

Bug#401692: Can the daemon be started without root privileges?

2006-12-05 Thread Guido Trotter
Package: ipw3945d Version: 1.7.22-2 Severity: wishlist Hi, ipw3945d documentation says it can work in non-root mode and provides examples for that... Can the debian package be done so it by default adds an unprivileged ipw3945d and runs the daemon under it? Thanks, Guido -- System

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-28 Thread Guido Trotter
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:17:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Hi, I can. :) Guido, be warned that Bastian often communicates with a few monosylabes and SVN commits :) This doesn't make working with him too problematic usually though :) We've been a bit more chatty, for now, but I

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-28 Thread Guido Trotter
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:29:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Hi, I guess that if people are able to find a kernel source tree outside of debian, they are perfectly capable of downloading and applying a patch too. Just include an URL to wherever such a patch is in the README.Debian of the

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-27 Thread Guido Trotter
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:51:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Hi, The kernel patches for XEN should be maintained inside the kernel team and in linux-2.6, they are free to join the kernel team to handle this, but it is unacceptable to have some kind of external patch to the kernel floating

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Xen in Debian [u]

2006-02-25 Thread Guido Trotter
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 01:11:35AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hi, I am sorry things have rushed today, things which should have better been discussed by all concerned persons, _before_. True, we're sorry on our part about that! We have been tracking xen support in the linux-2.6

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
Bastian Blank wrote: Hi! The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6 source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which can be hopefully uploaded today. Maintainer will be the kernel team, as there are heavy dependencies between xen and the kernel.

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: Hi, As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for dom0 only ?). Actually I think he meant the hypervisors too... Anyway I also think that if the kernel team is going to maintain the kernel images there

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote: Hi, Well, if the kernel team answers left to the kernel team and you close the alioth project, I guess you can always move into the kernel team ;) Yes, we could, of course... But on the other hand I believe that the xen

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:53PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote: Hi, I agree. I just would like to ask that, please, don't disband just because of disagreement with the kernel team, but try to cooperate anyway. I don't think we want to! And I hope there is no disagreement (we still don't

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi, It is a sort of kernel. Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it? Just to say, how connected xen to linux is: For

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:34:44PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi, Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it? The dom0 kernel is a Linux kernel built for the Xen hypervisor

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:40:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi, FWIW, the policy on kernel patches for sarge was that if it didn't apply to the kernel sources we shipped, it didn't need to be included as a package in stable. We're obviously not shipping a 2.6.12 kernel for etch, so I