On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:09:33AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:57:47PM -0700, Ryan Lovett wrote:
Are there plans to have more architectures enable the newer accounting file
format via CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3 ? I'm actually only interested in
amd64.
$ egrep
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:23:30AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi Andres,
In the course of using split-config I have noticed a small problem. In
some cases it is not safe to remove an option from a config, unless it
is removed gloablly
using a vanilla 2.4.31 kernel with the
kernel-patch-openswan package.
I have raised this with the linux-source-2.6.12 and iptables packages in the
BTS.
Please get these patches included upstream if you
want them to be included in the Debian kernel.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
of date,
and to be honest that is the nature of a stable release. If
you want something fresher try unstable or stable, and
the packages provided by linux-2.6, currently linux-source-2.6.12,
but soon to be linux-source-2.6.13.
Thanks
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:28:22PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:59 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:24:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
I have put 2.6.12.6 into the 2.6.12 tree in SVN (currently
dists/sid/kernel/linux-2.6) and manually merged the changes into the
2.6.8 sarge tree in SVN (currently
dists/sarge/kernel/source/kernel-source-2.6.8) I will look into which
and we miss some syscalls from 2.6. */
#if 0
printk(KERN_INFO IA32 syscall %d from %s not implemented\n, call,
current-comm);
#endif
return -ENOSYS;
}
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:54:45AM +0200, Daniel Kabs wrote:
Hello,
this is my first comment on bugs.debian.org. I hope this is the
correct way to add my 5 cent to it.
Yes, indeed it is, thanks for the additional information.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
supplied by linux-2.6
in sid. We are looking at making these available for Sarge,
but we haven't ironed out all the details yet.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the description of a fix, and the code of a fix. Too many
times I have hunted through packages and not had this, and been
horribly frustrated.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 307327 +upstream
reassign linux-2.6
thanks
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:
Le vendredi 12 août 2005 à 15:03 +0100, Jochen Voss a écrit :
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:09:55PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[the fn key patch] seems fine enough to me, has
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
I don't think there's a consensus
running Tiger (default installation) and it will complain
in a sarge system because of this:
$ ls -la /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 100 2005-06-07 00:09 /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source
-
/home/horms/tmp/debian-kernel-test/kernel-image-2.6.8-i386/kernel-image-2.6.8
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
with the advent of the unified kernel package for 2.6 some of the
original SVN layout has become irrelevant. As a background here is
how things used to look.
Ok
not be today.
Below is a summary of the changes. The ones that I think are security
bugs are labeld Maybe both in this list and in the changlog in SVN.
Feedback on if we think these are security bugs, and CAN numbers,
please.
--
Horms
SOURCE: 2.6.12.6
PATCH: ipsec-socket-policy-use-cap.patch
is to have the BTS do this automatically.
I've CCed Colin Watson, who once spoke to me about this idea offline,
to see if he is still interested in implemnting these kind of iedas.
--
Horms
kernel.org
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quite been able to
put my finger on the cause. I'll fix it in SVN ASAP.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
--
Horms
diff --exclude .svn -ruN a/debian/arch/alpha/config a/debian/arch/alpha/config
--- a/debian/arch/alpha/config 2005-08-30 11:45:58.0 +0900
+++ a/debian/arch/alpha/config 2005-08-30 13:02:05.0 +0900
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:53:38PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
svk may be different, if so,
this is a excellent time to discuss that.
It just gets crazy if it can't find merge points
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:51:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
You removed the ASFS entries. Did you used non-debian sources?
Perhaps there were some patches missing.
I
Due to growing frustrations with the continual changes to
the irc infastructure on freenode.net, such as no longer
being able to send messages as an unregistered user,
many of the people #debian-kernel are now on that
channel on irc.oftc.net. I am one of these people.
--
Horms
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:39:27PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:47:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I am also still wondering if there is any interest in
consolodating the entirel fs configuration, which seems
a bit of a mess right now - e.g. compare the EXT2/3 options
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:58:35PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:51:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
You removed the ASFS entries. Did you used non
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:15:23PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 15:33 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:41:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:53:38PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:41PM +0900, Horms
is regarded as folly by upstream
as they believe it is still too green.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=319659;msg=57
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at testing/unstable, then please use the kernels
provided by the linux-2.6 source package (currently 2.6.12), which
should have CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX (and other related options)
enabled.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
rearanging SVN again.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:55:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Horms wrote:
Hi Jeff, Hi All,
In the cause of debuging a problem with a DVD burner[1]
Brett Smith brought to my attention that there are several
variables in ./include/linux/libata.h, that when changed
from #undef to #define
tag 319659 +upstream
tag 319659 +wontfix
thanks
As per Jeff Garzik's mail that this feature is far to green
for distributions, I'm marking this bug as upstream and wonfix.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a by product
of the mashed discusion on IRC. Lets put changes into the one in
trunk/linux-2.6 and leave the one in trunk/kernel/linux-2.6 alone
until we decide what to do.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:58:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
oh, and additional point, could we stop moving things around without
a prior discussion on this list in the future?
I think that would be an excellent idea.
Especaially for anything that is in unstable.
--
Horms
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:56:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Personally, in the context of the two questions above, I advocate
trunk/linux-2.6
trunk/linux-2.6-experimental
I vote for this also, and would probably vote for moving
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:32:59AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:49:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
1. Should linux-2.6 go in trunk/kernel/ or just trunk.
Given that we no longer need source and per-arch directories,
it seems logical to just move it up to trunk
be introduced
without breaking too much.
experimental seems like a pretty fair indication.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a reason to think it will be in *better*
shape for etch?
If its abandonded upstream, I would guess not.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:33:08AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:54:30PM +0900, Horms wrote:
This layout removes the indicator, where changes may be introduced
without breaking too much.
experimental seems like a pretty fair indication.
Only if you do regular
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:14:53PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:02:13PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I believe part of the proposal is that development kernels are
targeted for experimental. And the sid ones are a bit more stable.
This applies only to some packages.
I
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:56:14PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:33:08AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:54:30PM +0900, Horms wrote:
This layout removes the indicator, where changes may be introduced
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:48:15PM -0400, A. Costa wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:13:54 +0900
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, time-keyd events in the BTS would be awsome.
But what if the reporter died? Would a bug cease to exist just
because its reporter did? If a tree falls
tag 319659 +uptream
thanks
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:24:17PM -0400, Brett Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:54:30PM +0900, Horms wrote:
If that's the case, I'd be happy to talk to upstream myself about it.
Talking to the SATA maintainers would probably be my best bet; if you
, if there are people using 2.4 for s390,
and 2.6 doesn't work, then removal of 2.4 is unlikely.
I believe this is the current status. Though perhaps
we can work towards changing it.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATA_ENABLE_PATA /* define to enable PATA support in some
* low-level drivers */
#undef ATAPI_ENABLE_DMADIR /* enables ATAPI DMADIR bridge support */
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=319659
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
to apply should just result in a noop, not the
script dying. I think that I have isolated the problem, and I will try
and get it fixed for the next release. The easiest work around, as Dann
suggested, is to just ommit debian from --added-patches for now.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
, and if
so, what permissions it has. It should be executable.
Also, the following might shed some light on what is going
on if its a compile problem: make V=1 menuconfig
Another idea that springs to mind is that /mnt/hd2/usr/src is
in a partition mounted noexec.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
failed.
Hit return to Continue
FYI: Sven Hartge has opened a bug for this in the BTS, #324583
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
into a simmilar report on debian-kernel and noticed
the same thing. I believe that I have a fix for it and it
should go in the next release. I'll send an update here once
I have had a chance to test my fix.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
tag 302001 + upstream
thanks
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:55:21AM +0200, Martin Stigge wrote:
Horms schrieb:
Is there any chance that any of the interested parties could test
a) 2.4.12 from unstable and b) an unpatched kernel from kernel.org?
I'll try an unpatched kernel on an affected
tag 324583 +pending
tag 324583 +patch
thanks
Hi,
I have put the attched patch into SVN which should resolve this problem.
It should appear in the next relase, likely 2.6.12-6
Thanks
Index: debian/rules.real
===
---
, it seems like it might as well.
Finally, the lists above are probably incomplete, please jump
in with additional information if you have it.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bogus and should go. But as the kernel
is a sarge vintage, and sarge is now stable, the update
process is slow, possibly non-existant.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:23:03AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Horms wrote:
Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
There is a symbolic link at /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source
which points to someone's home directory (horms). The horms
home directory does not exist on a new installation
tag 324351 +pending
thanks
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:55:48PM +0200, Simon Schoar wrote:
Quoting Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, I do not believe so.
but it is documented in run-parts(8). Perhaps this
should be reflected in mknitrd(8). Do you want
I tried to fix that, see attached patch
reassign 324550 libc6
thanks
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 08:17:58AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:49:23PM +0900, Simon Horman [Horms] wrote:
long time no see. It seems that the problem is indeed fixed if you get
the sarge (or later) versions of e2fsprogs and glibc
/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=6fc0b4a7a73a81e74d0004732df358f4f9975be2;hp=534afb90a9cd0b9643f62d660c164e1d924f39cf
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the next release.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when installing linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
succeeded.
I'm not sure either. Could you give some more details
of how it failed with 1.35-6?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:47:42PM +0200, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:50:20 +0900
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its an issue with the kernel. 2.6.10 does not compile cleanly
with gcc-4.0. 2.6.10 is being debricated and is no longer supported,
please consider using
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:31:37PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:48:53AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:47:14PM -0700, Tony Godshall wrote:
Hi.
Looks like building the initrd required an upgraded
Depends: directly or indirectly
pivot_root . initrd
fi
Does that mean its fixed?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 21 August 2005 03:56, Horms wrote:
I've put the following in SVN, so this
should be resolved in the next release.
I noticed on IRC that you put a closes: #322723 in the changelog.
I'm wondering if that is correct as I
meta-pakcages source package,
and some version shenanigans.
I have also found that there is no 2.6.11 kernel-source package in
testing. Haven't been 2.6.11 fully accepted into testing yet? There is 2.6.11
in
unstable.
2.6.11 is being debricated in favour of linux-source-2.6.12
--
Horms
,
it would be easy to replace the call with run-parts
which a simple while loop in mkinitrd.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
driver...
I was under the impression that /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/build/
was used rather than /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/source/
Is this incorrect?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and is in the process
of being debricated from the debian archive. Please either use
linux-source-2.6.12, or compile with gcc-3.3
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if the root device has been found or
not!
I hope this helps track the progress of this issue.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Do you have any ideas on a valid check for no root dev?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:59:05PM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 8/19/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:05:10PM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 8/18/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:53:50AM -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
Version: 2.6.8-16
There is a symbolic link at /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source
which points to someone's home directory (horms). The horms
home directory does not exist on a new installation
release.
Thanks for tracking this down, I was dreading having to.
--
Horms
Index: arch/i386/config.386
===
--- arch/i386/config.386(revision 3967)
+++ arch/i386/config.386(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:55:24AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Horms,
The plans you've described all sound good. I'm glad to see some
movement on the question of kernel updates for sarge.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:21PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Back to releases. After 2.4.27-11
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:05:10PM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 8/18/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc-3.3, or default to gcc-4.0?
Sorry for being unclear. If you build kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-11
then it should use
might be to try the
linux-image-2.6.12-1-686, which is in unstable
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:16:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:06:59AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:22:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[snip]
The rest of this message leads me to believe this is only a call for
2.4.27/unstable builds.
Sorry
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:34:32AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:02:40PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:22PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On the topic of Sid, I think we need to keep 2.4.27 there for now.
I've been
.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Broken
Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Horms schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Broken
Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
-4 is already in, so not important. :)
(Was a request from uploader to kick it because
over - its bogus but harmless.
Signed-off-by: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- a/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-08-03 14:46:33.0 +0900
+++ b/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-08-16 17:23:04.0 +0900
@@ -340,13 +337,13 @@
else if (!strcmp(value,acorn)) popt-map
it turns out that because of use of strtok(),
*value is already NULL terminated, and thus the code snippet
above is largely bogus. The following patch should remove the
bogus code without changing functionality.
Signed-off-by: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- ../build-386/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:21PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN,
and its probably a good time to think about some releases -
security bugs keep coming in all the time
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:02:40PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:22PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On the topic of Sid, I think we need to keep 2.4.27 there for now.
I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed
for some m68k flavours (mac
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:22:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN,
and its probably a good time to think about
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:06:59AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:22:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[snip]
The rest of this message leads me to believe this is only a call for
2.4.27/unstable builds.
Sorry if this was a bit unclear. Basically I am calling for three
with Maximilian's advice that it is highly likely that
errors like this typically indicate that a disk is failing and
that you should back up your data and replace the disk.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
More information/patch:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/5/245
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, as always. I have added this to SVN.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
reopen 323059
IMHO this is actually a valid bug while kernel-source-2.6.8 remains in
unstable. Lets leave it here as a marker, as a fressh version
of this bug seems to be posted about once a week.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
that the 2.6.8 is for Sarge,
and is earmarked for removal from Unstable.
linux-source-2.6 is the way forward.
Thanks
--
Horms
--- a/Makefile 2005-07-29 19:21:51.0 +0900
+++ b/Makefile 2005-07-29 19:22:25.0 +0900
@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@
else if [ -x /bin/bash ]; then echo /bin
tag 323039 +pending
thanks
These changes are now in SVN.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
something
that has needed to be done for a while.
--
Horms
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:33:07PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows
element type:
/tmp/buildd/hostap-modules-i386-0.3.7/kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386/include/asm/processor.h:75:
error: array type has incomplete element type
Hi,
I believe that this is a duplcate of #320256.
Please use gcc-3.3 to compile 2.4.27.
Thanks
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:11:21PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Hi folks,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:44:17AM +0300, Alexander Pytlev wrote:
Hello Debian,
Kernel 2.4.27-10
With mount isofs filesystem, any mount parameters
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 07:53:03PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:24:51AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Tags: security patch
There are another two vulnerabilities fixed in 2.6.12.5, that might require
backporting to 2.6.8
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:09:29PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050811 23:46]:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:56:00AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
The latter, according to volatile policy (... must be autobuildable
from the same release...).
Is that part
--
Horms
commit 0a65800243742480b4b594b619b759749a3cfef4
tree 72f9a3b376c604e7619ef265c7dc351644f45359
parent 635186447d0e6f3b35895fda993a266a1315d2a7
author Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1113690317 -0700
committer Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1113690317 -0700
[PATCH] x86_64: Rewrite exception stack
:
Thanks, I'll try and get these into SVN for linux-2.6 ASAP.
2.6.8 and 2.4.27 do not appear to be vulnerable.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:26:49AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Horms wrote:
There is no public CVE assignment for this issue. If's it easily
reproducable
for non-root, it might account as a local DoS vulnerability.
mii-tool's IOCTL is only allowed by root
for their consideration,
as this problem still seems to be present in the lastest 2.4 tree.
--
Horms
simply patch:
===
--- kernel-source-2.4.27/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-05-19 13:29:39.0
+0300
+++ kernel-source/fs/isofs
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:44:17AM +0300, Alexander Pytlev wrote:
Hello Debian,
Kernel 2.4.27-10
With mount isofs filesystem, any mount parameters after
iocharset=,map=,session= are ignored.
Sample:
mount -t isofs -o uid
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:50:41AM +0200, Erhard Schultchen wrote:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi Erhard,
your initial bug report states that after pluging in your cammera,
vol_id is executed (presumably the result of a kernel-generated
hotplug event) and it segfaults. After
failures under various kernels.
Thanks
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
401 - 500 of 1044 matches
Mail list logo
