presentation.
At this stage I am completely unsure of my plans for DebConf5, but if I
do end up going I would be happy to help out. I'll let you know when I
know.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for kernel-source.2.6.11 and it
should appear in the initial release. kernel-source.2.6.10
and kernel-source.2.6.9 are no longer being updated.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to me. Especually as people could easily
enable this and build them for themselves, or throw them
up somewhere for people to grab in the course of resolving
a problem.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:45:02AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:09:38PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:50:59PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
1) we package the plain 2.6.11 as provided by upstream in main and
upload
it. Those non-free firmware
Can you please update to a more recent version of 2.6.8 and retest?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will live in the orig.tar.gz
forever? Is this a problem? If not is it a problem not to prune them
from the tree later, rather just not compile them?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to wait with an upload for the updated debian source
(2.4.27-9).
FYI, I am progressing on the kernel-source aspect of that upload, slowly.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
added this to SVN and it should appear in the next release.
--
Horms
to prevent it from compiling correctly.
It sounds like the headers that you used to compile the module
and the kernel that you are running do not match.
Could you give the versions of the relevant kernel-image-2.6.8-X-FLAV and
kernel-headers-2.6.8-X-FLAV?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
of these patches seem to be present in
Debian 2.6.8, 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 (SVN) and upstream (bitkeeper).
Should this bug be closed?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-kpkg ...
Please note that the attached script is prefilted to replace @kbpkg@
with the kernel kernel-build-package version, kernel-kbuild-2.6-3.
--
Horms
#!/bin/sh
set -e
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
cd $DEBIAN_SRCTOP
{
find . -path './scripts/*' -prune -o \
-path './Documentation
+
}
ORIGDIR=`pwd`
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-obviously) that is likely to be where the fix
will be made.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to continue.
This looks a lot like a duplicate of Bug 282594.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282594
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for some reason. Are there any other logs before the
pivot_root message that might shed some light on this?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the next
release.
For the record:
The patch seems to already be present in 2.6.11.
And the bug does not seem to be present in 2.4.27.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the seqnum counter only if the kset wants to emit the
event.
Sounds suspiciously like it will alter the kernel ABI,
but if you have a patch please send it here.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the record, 2.4.27 does appear to be vulnerable to CAN-2005-0204
and a fix has been applied to svn.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to see what changes
have been made to airo.c recently. I have attached one
change that may be relevant. I can send the rest if you like.
--
Horms
# origin: achirica (BitKeeper)
# cset: 1.1923.5.4 (2.6) key=414f1e16kano60d7cM5x5_icY6g7AQ
# URL: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:43:54PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Thanks,
I have CCed the relevant maintainers for their comment.
The AGP change already went into Linus' tree, along with
removal of the _MCH driver.
Thanks, I thought
not include any of the EVMS patches. I
am not entirely sure what to do about this, but
if you could test the EVMS patches against
the debian 2.4.27 kernel that would be an
excellent start.
Thanks
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Hi,
Are you in a position to see if this patch helps the USB serial problem
you are seeing?
--
Horms
# origin: paulkf (BitKeeper)
# cset: 1.1482.2.2 (2.4) key=4186b9cdrEhF6Csz1SSx9dzswhwG8Q
# URL: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# inclusion: upstream
# descrition
that would be an
excellent start.
Ok. I'll try to test the kernel with EVMS snapshot patch and will replay you
results.
Thanks, much appreciated.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the many security holes)
to avoid destabalising rc3, you can go ahead with it now.
Horms, is anything new pending for the new 2.4 source package?
I am currently getting 2.4.27 ready for rerelease,
but as I got waylayed by other work this is a bit
behind and won't happen until next week
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:40:22PM -0800, David Lawyer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:55:42AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:07:20AM -0800, David Lawyer wrote:
I fixed the problem by setting the parallel port in the BIOS from ECP to
SPP. Then the driver does software
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:17:40AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Am 01.03.2005 um 04:23 schrieb Horms:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:30:16PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.77
Severity: normal
While playing around with virtual scsi drivers, I noticed
send it here.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there,
I will try and get them together and ping you again.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:06:51AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has
you considered reporting this to LKML and
the maintainers?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This seems relevant.
http://www.mail-archive.com/gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org/msg08579.html
It makes reference to an eratum from Intel which docouments
that the 8208CA may return eroneous values in some under
some circumstances.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
thoughts on the background out of the way, here's my advice:
Horms wrote:
The unfortunate problem is that the rc3 timeline meens if
a new 2.4.27 is to go in, it needs to be uploaded ASAP.
This in itself is a problem, because all the different arches
will need to update to the new kernel
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:41:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 05:45:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Holes that do not effect the installer enough to require an immediate
update can be dealt with more slowly, we can let the fixed kernel debs
get enough testing so we
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:15:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
As per some discusion with joeyh on debian-boot, cced to this list,
I would like to hold off on releasing kernel-source and
kernel-image-i386 2.4.27-9 until after I get back from
the debian mini-conf in Beijing. That is, i'd like
if these
are just harmless compiler warnings but I thought I should let you know.
Thanks,
those warnings are almost certainly harmless.
However, can you give this patch a whril?
It should make them go away.
--
Horms
diff -pru kernel-source-2.4.27.filp/drivers/char/drm/drmP.h
kernel-source-2.4.27
it to 2.6.8 and 2.6.10.
As for 2.4.27, i am not sure either. I will investigate further and
report back.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 296700 pending
thanks
Added to 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 (2.6.9 is dead).
Investigating 2.4.27.
As always, thanks for the bug report.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Feb 24, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udev names tun net/tun, and as it now thinks it is a net device, calls
hotplug tun
What makes you think that udev calls hotplug? This is not how I know it
works.
This makes me
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:18:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Feb 24, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/net/hotplug.dev
But this is a net subsystem script, so it's not supposed to be run for a
character device.
Can you trace the first call of hotplug and see what
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:26:53AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
those warnings are almost certainly harmless.
However, can you give this patch a whril?
It should make them go away.
--
Horms
This patch is reversed but otherwise effective
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:06:25AM +0100, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
I have installed kernel-image-2.6-686-smp and booted and it works :)
Excellent, I am glad to hear that.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:38:41AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 15:50 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 03:02:31PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Any debian-kernel folks gonna be at Debconf this year? Anyone planning
to talk? I was thinking about proposing one
are
for sarge and woody has been left in the cold a bit.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:55:30PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.22.1031 +0100]:
Ok, I want to have the latest kernel source installed,
so I install kernel-tree. Thats a reason.
Please read the thread before you post. kernel-tree packages do
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:15:26PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Feb 22, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, no one listened to my explanation the first time around,
so here is the point-form version.
* Tun is a misc device.
* It is not a net device.
So why net.agent ends up being
start 2.6.8-2 exactly once. But when trying to reboot once more, 2.6.8-2 will
again stop on the line mentioned above.
Bootparam 'nolapic' does reliably work around the stop.
That is probably the as good as its going to get for 2.6.8.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
i686
GNU/Linux
In the attachment you can see my kernel config from 2.6.10 vanila
kernel.
Sounds like the bug is that we need to add an image for VIA.
We can't really do this for sarge. But we could do it for 2.6.10
which is only in unstable.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
reassign 286803 kernel-source-2.6.8
thanks
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:09:53AM +0100, Ingo Strüwing wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 12:28 +0900 schrieb Horms:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:33:30PM +0100, Ingo Strüwing wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2005, 18:28 +0900 schrieb Horms
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:16:47AM +0100, Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote:
I've installed 2.4.27-8, let's see what happens.
So far so good?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist
that was added around 2.6.8. Which kernel were you upgrading from.
Is there anything in dmesg relating to this?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:36:59PM +0100, Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote:
* Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050223 14:34]:
So far so good?
Unfortunately not. I posted an update already. A couple of hours after I
installed the new version, X crashed. Details are on
http://bugs.debian.org/284567
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 02:37:59PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Feb 23, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why net.agent ends up being called for it?
The funny thing is, that it doesn't for me.
Neither for me.
If you conpare the trace I sent and the one that Artur sent
we see
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:02:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
[cut]
BTW, if you find it usefull, snippet of log with uncommented DEBUG in
/etc/hotplug.d
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:11:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.11.0823 +0100]:
Sounds good to me, though I am slightly dubious about the last
paragraph.
Well, can you think of a use outside of the offfical archive?
I am just
.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to release rc3 from the
kernel update standpoint at least.
--
see shy jo
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with snd-emu10k1? Could you also send the output of dmesg
and lcpci.
Thanks.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-14 from SVN, I can make a snapshot available if that helps.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem that needs to be fixed.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, which is
required for initrd to work with 64-bit kernels.
Thus, for amd64 kernels, I would propose a version dependency of
e2fsprogs = 1.35-7 to fix this in the future.
That is the best fix I have seen so far, any objections.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
(0x) ?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:33:30PM +0100, Ingo Strüwing wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2005, 18:28 +0900 schrieb Horms:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Ingo Strüwing wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2005, 10:33 +0900 schrieb Horms:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:50:49PM +0100, Ingo
://www.debconf.org/miniconf4/
I will post the presentation here once it is ready.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the part of the strings that are left of the . numerically und the
rest lexicographically.
The attached patch, which makes use of dpkg --compare-versions, has
been working well for me. I will get it into svn for the next version.
--
Horms
Index: apply
I had checked it, but yesterday the
kernel compiled with the above configuration gave the same errors.
Thanks for the update.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in
tracking the problem down.
Thanks
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Ingo Strüwing wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2005, 10:33 +0900 schrieb Horms:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:50:49PM +0100, Ingo Strüwing wrote:
I have additional information:
- The problem exists in 2.6.10 too. (BTW. should I report it there too
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:18:47AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I did a bit of poking around, uncomented
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:25:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Feb 09, Artur R. Czechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got following message when modprobing tun
the dependancy on
kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 for 2.6.8 as well and just include the files in
their kernel-headers packages. This should resolve this problem without
creating too much disruption.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
.
Thanks for the heads-up.
I see no reference to discover in mkinitrd (from svn or 0.1.77).
Am I looking in the wrong place?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
GPG public key from http://www.iki.fi/Tapio.Lehtonen
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. The system is under high load.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
{
}
int init_module(void)
{
return 0;
}
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the
alsa-modules are not. But end-users care not where
packages come from, just that they are there. So I
think this idea is reasonable.
Does anyone object?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will not boot!
but it can also be triggered by needed modules being compiled into
the kernel.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seems to take
longer.
Thanks, reassigned accordingly.
Actually, I am going to reassign it to kernel-soruce-2.6.8
as that is most likely where the problem lies.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:05:13PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:20:42AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim
of
removing it. Perhaps it could detect when DEBCONF_FRONTEND is
noninteractive and not display?
Seems like this would best fit as an option in /etc/kernel-img.conf, and
therefore should be reassigned to kernel-package.
Yes, isn't that what the clobber_modules option does?
--
Horms
.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to fail.
Could you give a little more information on how it failed?
I.e. what messages were provided during the course of the install.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:32:39PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
Horms wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 04:38:05PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-12
Severity: important
Load average is reported very high, but it ain't so.
$ cat /proc
Hi,
Could you please try 2.4.27-8 and see if pain persists?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:53:54AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Horms wrote:
I have gone through and turned this off for everything except mips,
for which I am not sure about the structure of the package.
For mips it is already disabled in the relevant configs.
Thanks for clarifying
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:24:42AM +, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
Horms said at 24/01/2005 08:18:
Could you please try 2.4.27-8 and see if pain persists?
I already closed this bug, from the closure message:
Sorry, I missed that.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:41:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-10 16:24]:
As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking
2.4.26-1.2 Linux module utilities
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-2.4.27 as that is where the
problem most likely lies.
Can you plase try the 2.4.27-8 kernels from
http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/
I plan to upload these later today.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 05:11:23PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:15:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:48:38PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
When I tried to build kernel 2.6.10 from debian source, I got
following message.
/usr/src/kernel-patches
tags 291039 +pending
tags 291107 +pending
thanks
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 12:31:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
With some good will you can read this from:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_03
---
If the command substitution consists
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:23:27AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:37:21PM +0100, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
Package: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.9
Version: 2.6.9-5
Severity: normal
The file apply/debian (/usr/src/kernel
reassign 291039 dash
reassign 291107 dash
thanks
There seems to be a problem with dash mistaking
mistaking $(( ... ) ... ) as $(( exp ))
--
Horms
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:57:23AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:23:27AM
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 06:43:50PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Horms wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:30:24PM +0100, Georg Wittenburg wrote:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-3
Severity: normal
When the intelfb module is compiled into the kernel all consoles
it to #291039. Could you
please test out the attached patch and see if it works for you.
I agree that this is not a good state for things to be in.
--
Horms
Index: apply
===
--- apply (revision 2324)
+++ apply (working
reassign 280492 kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha
thanks
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:21:47PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Horms wrote:
[snip]
The patch from ultramonkey.org above was fished out of
a Red Hat Kernel RPM (by me). It still seems to be used
in their latest kernel (27.0.1.EL.um.1), so I
801 - 900 of 1044 matches
Mail list logo
