Bug#752789: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs doesn't honor /usr/share/initramfs-tools/modules

2014-09-29 Thread Lukas Anzinger
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: I think the best way to deal with this would be to add a comment clarifying which file path is actually read. Yes, that would be really helpful! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#752789: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs doesn't honor /usr/share/initramfs-tools/modules

2014-09-29 Thread Lukas Anzinger
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/modules is the 'shipped' version of /etc/initramfs-tools/modules, and is copied to the latter file if it does not already exist. The comment is of course correct in the copy. And

Bug#752789: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs doesn't honor /usr/share/initramfs-tools/modules

2014-06-26 Thread Lukas Anzinger
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.115 Severity: normal Hi, mkinitramfs (the tool that is called from update-initramfs) doesn't honor /usr/share/initramfs-tools/modules, it only honors /etc/initramfs-tools/modules and /usr/share/initramfs-tools/modules.d. This is unfortunate because

Bug#751488: initramfs-tools: Shell spawned despite panic=0

2014-06-26 Thread Lukas Anzinger
Control: found -1 0.115 This bug is still present in the latest available version. Regards, Lukas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#751488: initramfs-tools: Shell spawned despite panic=0

2014-06-13 Thread Lukas Anzinger
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.109.1 Severity: critical Tags: patch Hi, I've set panic=0 as a kernel cmdline argument which should trigger a reboot instead of spawning a shell. However, the reboot seems to be uneffective and a shell is spawned nevertheless. This is unpleasing since spawn=0

Bug#661696: [2.6.33.y] drm/i915: wrong fifo size due to uncareful refactoring which results in an xserver crash at 800x600

2012-06-25 Thread Lukas Anzinger
. 1024x768 or 1280x1024), I don't encounter this problem. [...] Jonathan Nieder wrote: Lukas Anzinger wrote: looks good to me. Do you mean that the patch looks good or that you've tried applying it and the behavior was bad before and good afterward? Ping.  Have you tested this patch

Bug#661696: drm/i915: wrong fifo size due to uncareful refactoring which results in an xserver crash at 800x600

2012-03-02 Thread Lukas Anzinger
Hi Jonathan, looks good to me. I've also reported this bug upstream under #42839. Regards, Lukas On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 19:36, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: tags 661696 = upstream patch moreinfo quit Hi Lukas, Lukas Anzinger wrote: During a refactoring of the i915 driver

Bug#661696: drm/i915: wrong fifo size due to uncareful refactoring which results in an xserver crash at 800x600

2012-02-29 Thread Lukas Anzinger
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-41 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch Hi, I've encountered a nasty bug in the drm/i915 part of Debian's stable kernel. The code is also present in 2.6.33.20, which is the latest stable upstream release of 2.6.33.y at the time of writing. During a