On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:01:22PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> It's worth pointing out that in Ubuntu, the generated MOK key
> is for module signing only (extended key usage 1.3.6.1.4.1.2312.16.1.2),
> kernels signed with it will NOT be bootable.
Why should these be separate keys?
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 09:33:46PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Added "Ben Hutchings "
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:13 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:39:57AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > +vmlinux=$($MAKE -s -f
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:39:57AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> +CC the maintainers of CERTIFICATE HANDLING
> M: David Howells
> M: David Woodhouse
> L: keyri...@vger.kernel.org
Davids, can one of you respond to this?
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 12:11 PM Matthew
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:39:57AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > +vmlinux=$($MAKE -s -f $srctree/Makefile image_name)
> > +key=
> > +if is_enabled CONFIG_EFI_STUB && is_enabled CONFIG_MODULE_SIG; then
> > + cert=$(grep ^CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY= include/config/auto.conf | cut
> > -d\" -f2)
If the config file specifies a signing key, use it to sign
the kernel so that machines with SecureBoot enabled can boot.
See https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
---
v2:
- Handle private keys stored in the pem file as well as adjacent to the
certificate
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:28:40PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:47 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 22:07, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > If the config file specifies a signing
If the config file specifies a signing key, use it to sign
the kernel so that machines with SecureBoot enabled can boot.
See https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
---
scripts/package/builddeb | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 02:01:53PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 14:00, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
> wrote:
> >
> > If the config file specifies a signing key, use it to sign
> > the kernel so that machines with SecureBoot enabled can boot.
> &g
If the config file specifies a signing key, use it to sign
the kernel so that machines with SecureBoot enabled can boot.
See https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
---
scripts/package/builddeb | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.8
In /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions, xhci-hcd is spelled
simply xhci. It was renamed to xhci-hcd in 2.6.34-rc2.
Please update this script.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
).
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:43:26AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
On 08/05/07, Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reassign 422713 pciutils
tags 422713 d-i
Probably I would have assigned this to the kernel than to pciutils.
(OTOH, taking into account that (probably) due to this bug
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:34:06PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Also, can someone look into HPPA, or point me at which patch to use?
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6-2.6.14/linux-2.6_2.6.14-1-hppa.log.gz
I know I *said* not to use the -pa0 kernel, but it's booted fine for me
on a K460 and
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:35:14PM +0900, Horms wrote:
That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last week.
Is anyone looking into it?
It's fixed in CVS
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:35:14PM +0900, Horms wrote:
That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last week.
Is anyone looking into it?
It's fixed in CVS.
I blame the person who took a snapshot before we went to -pa1 ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:42:25AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file
via /proc?
It's in /boot instead
--
Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:51:30AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Then let's see some acts. We (lkml) are not the ones with the percieved
problem, or the ones discussing it.
Actually, there are some legitimate problems with some of the files in
the Linux source base. Last time this came up, the Acenic
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
(or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the
available information
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:31:24AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
The way that arch/subarch specific patches are handled needs to be thought
out. There are architectures that are close to linus kernels, and there
are those that aren't. The preferred way to do things is to have
something
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
How big is the chance that we will have another ABI change during
sarge's lifetime (100%?). So it can't hurd to figure out the problems
with that now independently of our decision in this matter...
Absolutely. It's bound to
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:06:19AM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
And I believe that the Vancouver proposal, if implemented as intended up
to now, will not only affect what Debian really *is*, but in some ways
will *destroy* what Debian is.
Debian has already decided to destroy what it is by
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:47:51PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
This is basically a call for suggestions for what I should backmerge
to 2.6.8 from recent CVS. I will go through the parisc-linux-cvs archive
again and try to pull what I can see, but I'd like a bit of help.
In case it wasn't
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Anyway, regarding kernels: I can imagine sometimes, especially with the
backlog we have currently, a swift processing of some kernel package
might be warranted and help Sarge. If there is such a case, it would
help if someone
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:08:19PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Thanks. Maybe i should resign from my debian duties then since i am not
wanted. Do you volunteer to take over my packages ? Please handle parted for
which i am searching a co-maintainer since 6 month, and take over the
powerpc
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:16:46AM -, linay long wrote:
I am new to debugging linux kernel. I have an mpc8540 based board with
BDI2000. Now I am trying to debug Linux kernel.u-boot is the bootloader.The
steps I followed listed below.The problem I am facing is
debian-kernel really isn't
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 06:21:24PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
reassign 294867 kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
thanks
If a driver hangs the system when loaded, it is a good hint of a kernel
bug.
I think de4x5 should be a driver of last resort. Tulip should always
be preferred to drive a given piece
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:09:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I think de4x5 should be a driver of last resort. Tulip should always
be preferred to drive a given piece of hardware. I wouldn't shed any
tears if we stopped shipping de4x5 by default -- it's caused no end
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:33:51PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Actually, the kernel of my dreams is more near to the vanilla
kernel.org kernel, so I'd like to be able to throw out patches that
you need to apply because of your _much_ broader user base.
otoh, I would like to run a 2.6.10 kernel
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:08:29PM +0100, Robin Bultot wrote:
BUT when I rebooted in 2.6.9 I get an error:
VFS: Cannot open root device hde3 or unknown-block(0,0)
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
My motherboard is a
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 03:04:34PM +, Håvard Dahle wrote:
I am sorry. As it turns out, this is now resolved, and I suspect that eth1394
never was the culprit.
I am not sure what was the real fix. I am tracking debian sid, and updates to
discover (I think) made the problem go away.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:17:31PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Warning: long. CC'ed to debian-legal in case anyone there knows anything more.
How about cc'ing the author of the driver? He might know the answer.
The source for the acenic driver is in fact in the source package for
the
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:26:40PM +0100, Paul Akkermans wrote:
Hello everyone,
HEY! RETARD!! This is the third time this week you've posted to
debian-kernel. This is the third time I'm telling you to fuck off.
I was polite before. But now you've made me angry. GO AWAY.
--
Next the
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:51:30PM +0100, Paul Akkermans wrote:
Hi group,
I have a compicated question. I am analysing the input core. My question is
if it is so that the functions and procedures which are defined and exported
in input.c can be overridden in other modules (other than
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 12:18:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Discover says to use the acenic driver for these, but it does not seem
to be available in the 2.4 or 2.6 kernels for hppa or i386. I do see the
driver the the kernel source so please turn it on.
I thought the anti-firmware fanatics had
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:01:33PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
* ACENIC firwmare, driver disabled:
. drivers/net/acenic_firmware.h
So there's a good reason why you're unable to use these cards.
ITYM good reason to switch to Ubuntu, Gentoo or Fedora. HTH.
--
Next the statesmen will invent
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:57:24PM +0100, Paul Akkermans wrote:
I am analysing the input layer of the kernel 2.6.7 and I came across this
function and I have no idea what it is for. Can anybody help me?
I suggest you ask kernelnewbies at
http://www.kernelnewbies.org/mailinglist.php3
This list
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:33:38PM +0530, Rishi wrote:
After re-booting... the top program shows only one CPU.
press '1'.
--
Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 03:36:36PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
having /proc/config.gz available would be a nice default,
Ive been having some difficulty building a working kernel,
and the kernel-image-2.6.8.1-k7 works. It would be handy
as a starting point.
What's wrong with /boot/config?
--
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 06:25:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:21:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:38:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
tags 272029 +upstream
thanks
Please get feature-patches merged upstream before bugging us,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:51:31AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
I recently encountered a machine (a Thinkpad 860) with a NCR 53C810
SCSI controller that would not work properly unless the config option
CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_IOMAPPED was set. Under these circumstances,
installation was a
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 11:53:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All
I am a recent convert to Debian. have installed Debian in my old machine
i386 machine at 300 Mhz with 256 MB RAM.and 30GB HDD.
It connects to the internet via a router. I would like to know if there is
a way
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 05:39:20PM +0200, eolyte wrote:
It seems that only the devices that are plugged before the uhci_hcd module is
loaded are detected. These are working properly, but if I plug another device
after, it doesn't even appear in /proc/bus/usb/devices, and idem if i
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 05:15:36PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
32-bit PCI cards should work without problems in 64-bit slots, though.
That's what I thought, but I have an Adaptec 2940UW card that causes
instability reliably in 64bit pci slots.
Maybe the card can't
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:29:50PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the premature bug report, but it looks like the problem was
caused by a 32-bit PCI SCSI card in a 64-bit slot.
32-bit PCI cards should work without problems in 64-bit slots, though.
--
Next the statesmen will invent
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:22:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:12:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
The only ones that aren't already upstream, afaict, are:
sym53c8xx_revert.patch - The new domain validation stuff mysteriously
breaks
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 11:43:57AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES
Syn cookies are bad idea in these day's internet, no need to
waste space for support.
Err, you want to make any machine DoSable
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 10:29:34PM +0200, Kim wrote:
eax: 014c ebx: c130aaf0 ecx: 1000 edx: 0001038f
Single bit set.
Does anyone know what this is?
Bad RAM. Run memtest86 to confirm, but you've got all the classic
symptoms of a
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:27:09PM +0200, Alexander Reinholdt wrote:
Configuring the kernel sources fails with an compiler error:
dustpuppy:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.6# make menuconfig
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
cc1: internal compiler error: Speicherzugriffsfehler
Please submit a full
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 05:51:03PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 14:38, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040615 21:27]:
I request that the people planning to take over kernel maintenance comment
ASAP on their plans regarding this issue,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:35:40PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Please, no debates on the firmware subject.
Here is the current blacklist of tainted files that need to be
sanitized and/or removed from virgin mainline.
Why is drivers/scsi/qlogicisp_asm.c not on this list?
--
Next the
Try booting with pci=noacpi. I bet the devices will show up in
lspci then. There's a known bug with broken BIOSes.
--
Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, theres lots of code in kernelspace that assumes a partitioned disk
has a block of minors. Use a volume manager instead of traditional
partitions if you need more than 15
52 matches
Mail list logo
