Bug#655387: [PATCH net] cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-04-26 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2012, 12:55:03 schrieb Bjørn Mork: Some RNDIS devices include a bogus CDC Union descriptor pointing to non-existing interfaces. The RNDIS code is already prepared to handle devices without a CDC Union descriptor by hardwiring the driver to use interfaces 0 and 1,

Bug#655387: [PATCH] usb: cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-01-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 09:36:56 schrieb Iker Salmón San Millán: 2012/1/11 Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no if you have the patience to test yet-another-patch. Bjørn Yes, I do, but: 2012/1/11 Oliver Neukum said: You are trying something subtle here. Stop doing that. Use

Bug#655387: [PATCH] usb: cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-01-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:29:57 schrieb Markus Kolb: Is it really a broken union descriptor? There is all information but the original cdc_ether code can only handle union descriptor which starts with 0. That is something e.g. the Windows driver can handle. Possibly cdc-ether is also

Bug#655387: [PATCH] usb: cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-01-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:56:37 schrieb Markus Kolb: On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:16 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:29:57 schrieb Markus Kolb: Is it really a broken union descriptor? There is all information but the original cdc_ether code can only handle

Bug#655387: [PATCH] usb: cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-01-10 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2012, 23:15:16 schrieb Bjørn Mork: - goto bad_desc; + /* Fallback to guessing for rndis +* class devices with bogus union +* descriptor. +

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

2006-12-15 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 10:30 schrieb Oleg Verych: On 12/14/06, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: Hallo. Due to very big distance to my usual work stand, please accept this. Hm, I don't think this driver is orphaned.

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-07 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 16:30 schrieb Humberto Massa: I don't recall anyone asking Intel to give theirs designs away. This thread is about: 1. (mainly) some firmware hexdumps present in the kernel source tree are either expicitly marked as being GPL'd or unmarked, in which case one

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-07 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 17:01 schrieb Humberto Massa: Oliver Neukum wrote: As this has been discussed numerous times and consensus never achieved and is unlikely to be achieved, I suggest that you keep this discussion internal to Debian until at least you have patches which