reassign 1000905 src:linux
retitle 1000905 Internal laptop keyboard not recognized and not working
thanks
Hi. I'm reassigning this bug (using bcc) because it was filed against
base-files but it's more a bug in Linux.
Thanks.
Package: linux-image-4.19.0-5-cloud-amd64
Version: 4.19.37-5
Dear maintainer:
On a virtual machine running buster on Google Compute Engine, where
this kernel package is the default, I get the following messages:
google_clock_skew_daemon[1539]: hwclock: Cannot access the Hardware Clock via
any
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.16.12-1
Severity: serious
Hello Ben.
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" and it
failed in this way:
[...]
/bin/sh: 1: bison: not found
scripts/Makefile.lib:217: recipe for target 'scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c' failed
make[5]: ***
reassign 883980 chromium,linux
thanks
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 05:45:33PM -0600, Hanlyu Sarang wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 9.9+deb9u3
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I upgraded to Debian 9.3 today, using aptitude update/aptitude upgrade, then
> rebooted the computer.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 06:23:27PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 18:05 +0000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:04:50PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I intend to upload linux version 4.9.2-1 to unstable tomorrow
> > > (We
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:04:50PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux version 4.9.2-1 to unstable tomorrow
> (Wednesday). As this is a new upstream version, there is of course an
> ABI bump.
Hi.
(Sorry if this is already reported, last time I looked at the bug page
I didn't
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:04:50PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux version 4.9.2-1 to unstable tomorrow
> (Wednesday). As this is a new upstream version, there is of course an
> ABI bump.
Hi.
(Sorry if this is already reported, last time I looked at the bug page it was
Hi.
The following workaround worked for me:
Try setting the CPU type to be a "simple old CPU" without a lot of
features. For example, the following change fixed the problem in my
case:
--- a/libvirt/qemu/machine.xml
+++ b/libvirt/qemu/machine.xml
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ or other application using the
forcemerge 833016 841007
thanks
Hi.
You will see that both bugs belong to the "src:linux" package,
so it's better not to file duplicates. To tell the BTS that
a certain version has the bug, we have a "found" command.
I'm merging the bugs with this message.
BTW: There is a 4.9-rc version in
I can reproduce this as well.
Also running a stretch VM on a jessie KVM/qemu/libvirt host.
My KVM host is a i5-6400 running linux 3.16.36-1+deb8u2.
Thanks.
Package: src:numix-icon-theme
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build "numix-icon-theme" in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 04:33:58PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > You can use the command ischroot from the debianutils package.
>
> Why would I want to add a dependency on that? [...]
You really wouldn't, because debianutils is essential.
severity 825423 important
thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> this seems to suggest that you are not using a throw-away chroot but
> a persistent one. Could you provide details about your chroot setup?
> Are you not using schroot?
I am using schroot. This
Package: src:linux,src:supermin,src:sbuild
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks other packages
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanv...@debian.org
Dear maintainers:
I think this is a bug in linux, but I'm not 100% sure.
Please do agree with the other maintainers on which package is to blame.
I'm building
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:41:09PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Yes, you must do that. Your custom kernel configuration should be
> > > based on the appropriate file provided in linux-source-4.5. These have
> > > the CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL, CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY and
> > >
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 08:51:25PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> You wrote:
> [...]
> > Should I remove CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS from .config before building
> > the kernel? I hope not.
> [...]
>
> Yes, you must do that. Your custom kernel configuration should be
> based on the
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.5.2-1
Dear maintainer:
I merged the output of "lsmod" in two different virtual machines
running stretch/sid to create a minimal kernel which works on both.
The combined file is attached as "lsmod.txt".
Then I created a .config file by executing this script:
Package: src:linux-tools
Version: 4.2-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64
Version: 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1
Severity: important
Note: I'm not sure which package to blame here. I chose the kernel
because I believe the kernel knows better than anybody else which
modules are suitable to be unloaded and which modules are not, but
this could
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.116
When I install dracut, a new initrd is generated automatically using dracut.
If I install initramfs-tools again, dracut is removed but this time a
new initrd (generated by initramfs-tools) is not generated.
I see a lot of danger here.
Either initrds are
There is now a patch available here:
The patch comes from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11242
which I'm attaching to this report.
My machine (Mac Mini powerpc with USB keyboard) had the same problem
and the patch fixes it.From 252b7805384d12c6857b8bebf1a373e327afbec9 Mon Sep 17
severity 494374 serious
tags 494374 + upstream
tags 494374 + patch
thanks
While we are at it, I consider this bug important enough to delay the
release of lenny until it's fixed.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 04:19:24PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-22etch2 works ok
linux-image-2.6.20-1-686 version 2.6.20-3 does not work
linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 version 2.6.26-5
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
To summarize: No matter how faulty my hardware might be (the boot
never took so long with etch), I don't think it is reasonable at all
that a user has to do this in order for the boot process not to take
more than three minutes.
Maybe
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
this looks more like a kernel bug,
One detail I've just noticed: After the boot, the eject button of /dev/hdc
does not work at all. This didn't happen with etch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
reassign 498645 linux-2.6
stop
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
this looks more like a kernel bug,
One detail I've just noticed: After the boot, the eject
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92i
After installing a lenny system today, it happened that the boot
process takes more than 3 minutes to finish. Needless to say, I first
believed it was frozen and didn't work at all. I was lucky to discover
(by accident) that it was a very long waiting time
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7
Version: 2.6.18-6
I have a system here which shows this message when booting:
kobject_add failed for audio with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with
the same name in the same directory.
[c01b8d8a] kobject_add+0x146/0x16c
[c0213a6e]
Same problem here:
mac:~# apt-get install linux-image-2.6-powerpc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
linux-image-2.6-powerpc is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
[ snipped paragraph about Manoj ]
Quoting Julian Gilbey in the logs for this bug:
According to Manoj in the logs to bug#394661, which was blocking this
bug and has since been closed, the bug was fixed in kernel-package
10.063. So I guess that all
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
We really need a better way to handle bug reports which affect more than one
package, since cloning and merging is not the best way to go for those.
In the past, the BTS allowed things like this:
Package: foo, bar
I'm not sure if this is still
31 matches
Mail list logo
