On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 03:34:09PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:04:21AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Could someone give me a pointer on how to update the abi for m68k?
debian/bin/abiupdate.py
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:36:17PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:02:01PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:45:13PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:56:21AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
It looks like
| gfs2_unregister_lockprotomodule: fs/gfs2/gfs2,
version: 0x24aada0c, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
| gfs2_withdraw_lockproto module: fs/gfs2/gfs2,
version: 0x69b66631, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
How do I fix this?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:45:13PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:56:21AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
It looks like the CONFIG_LBD=n change caused an abi change on m68k
atari. (Seems obvious now, but I didn't run into this problem with
the build test
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:20:36AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 07:54:01AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
These patches seem to break the build for me.
| debian/dfsg/drivers-net-tg3-fix-simple.patch
| debian
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 07:54:01AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
These patches seem to break the build for me.
| debian/dfsg/drivers-net-tg3-fix-simple.patch
| debian/dfsg/drivers-net-bnx2-request_firmware-1.patch
| features/all/drivers-usb-serial-keyspan-request_firmware.patch
| features/all
/dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian
and make your changes there.
Okay thanks.
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:27:12AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Howdy!
Christian is going on travel so I'm hoping to add some m68k patches so
we can build with the same compiler as all the other archs. Especially
since gcc-3.3 isn't
2.6.25 releases so now would be a good
time.
Is this going to be a problem? If not, I'll try to get started.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[1]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6ver=2.6.22-5arch=m68kstamp=1193495100file=log
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- debian/config/m68k/config.atari.orig 2007-12-29 09:31:21.0 -0600
+++ debian/config/m68k
'
| make[1]: *** [build_m68k_none_amiga_real] Error 2
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/stephen/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6-2.6.23'
| make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
buildd logs may be available at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=linux-modules-extra-2.6
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Should be fixed with new linux 2.6.17 and linux-kbuild-2.6.17 (now in
new).
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, kernel-doc-2.2.25
Are these two actually needed/used today? Or can they be removed?
Currently still being used by d-i for m68k/mac. They should probably be
dropped at the same time the 2.4 kernels go.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED
(as best I can), but we may need a separate repo to grab the
older kernels from.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
could easily be wrong though. ;)
So, as long as we're not dropping full support for 2.4 in other
subsystems, I don't see a problem.
Right. What subsystems might be affected?
I think I've heard glibc wants to drop some cruft. I'm sure there are
others.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's
not in the
kernel packages as I recall.
So, as long as we're not dropping full support for 2.4 in other
subsystems, I don't see a problem.
Any one else?
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if necessary.
In other words, don't worry about holding on to any kernels just for us.
I hope to keep some 2.4 and 2.2 support in d-i until we get everything
moved, but I'll try to keep it out of the way or in a branch.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL
with 2.6 yet, so I'll
have to leave that test for someone else.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
).
FWIW, I put it on the todo http://wiki.debian.org/DebianM68kPorting.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
with the kernel and specific modules.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:24:43PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really it's just creating udebs with the kernel and specific modules.
That would solve a lot of problems, including the GPL one. The debs
and udebs would update at the same
the m68k
reorg yet. 2.2.25/2.4.27 is correct. common-kernels is the only place
need to change kernel versions now.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-di-m68k) or look at binary udeb packages such as
kernel-image-*-di (e.g., kernel-image-2.4.26-mac-di).
You could look in svn, but then you'd have to check to see if it'd been
uploaded anyway. Additionally, it doesn't provide any more information
than the archive.
--
Stephen R. Marenka
24 matches
Mail list logo
