On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 09:11:02PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
Could you update wheezy backports version of firmware-nonfree too (now at
version 0.41 while jessie/sid has 0.43)?
bpo version is still 0.41
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Could you update wheezy backports version of firmware-nonfree too (now at
version 0.41 while jessie/sid has 0.43)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 06:32:05PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Version: 3.9-1
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:19:56AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
It still does with 3.2 in stable, but not with 3.9 in testing.
Closing with that version, then.
No such version (3.9-1) was uploaded,
I think that initramfs-tools 0.110 fixes should go to sid/wheezy.
Or make kernels in experimental depend on this version or higher.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
When using squeeze system, with wheezy (backports) of kernel and firmware,
recently firmware-linux started to recommend intel-microcode and
amd64-microcode packages.
I think that intel-microcode recommends can be versioned, so that it prefers
reworked versions (1.20120606.1 or newer) instead of
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 22:28:56 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
New image is up at
http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/linux-image-3.2.0-4.drm-amd64_3.2.34-1~jcristau.1_amd64.deb
sha1sum is
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:28:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
New image is up at
http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/linux-image-3.2.0-4.drm-amd64_3.2.34-1~jcristau.1_amd64.deb
sha1sum is 1bbb6e4590e4f000739af89f3090ffc6bb9cb409.
diff against svn at
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:54:51PM +0100, Ingo wrote:
Since 2 weeks I an running kernel 3.4 from kernel.org. I used config from
Debian's 3.4.4-1~experimental.1 with make silentoldconfig and accepted
defaults fo 5 new items. This is a long term kernel as well and thus
still maintained.
I
amd64 debs aren't yet available from my mirror (ftp.fi.debian.org) for some
reason, do they show up in other places?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 03:59:02PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
amd64 debs aren't yet available from my mirror (ftp.fi.debian.org) for some
reason, do they show up in other places?
nevermind, latest mirror update has it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:39:29PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Source: linux
Version: 3.2.20-1
Hi kernel maintainers,
Gergely Nagy wrote:
reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1
Several bugs seem to have been filed
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:03:02AM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
On 07/01/2012 07:05 AM, Touko Korpela wrote:
...
+if test $post_2_6_38; then
+ XZ=xz --check=crc32 -8
+else
+ XZ=false
+fi
From xz(1) manual page (you can ignore DecMem):
Preset DictSize
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:01:47PM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
The attached patch brings vmlinuz from about 13MB to about 9.5MB, which
is well under the 12MB limit. Downside is that xz compressing is
noticeably slower than currently used gzip, but decompressing speed
difference is not
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.106
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: breaks the whole system
After patching my system 3 days ago it will not further boot up. The initramfs
prompt comes before the keypass
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
-- /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md50 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdd1[3] sde1[5]
625137664 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
bitmap: 1/3 pages [4KB], 65536KB
I think it would make sense to display note or news item at 'linux-2.6' PTS
page at http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.html telling that source
package is now renamed to 'linux'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:47:03PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Some hardware support; this can still be done after the freeze but the
sooner the better:
- [armhf] omapdrm driver
- [x86] gma500 support for new chips
- [x86] i915 improvements in Ivy Bridge support
- radeon support for new
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:21:28PM +0200, Camaleón wrote:
2012/6/1 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com:
OTOH, I will try to reproduce the instability state with 3.2.16-1 over
the weekend and will comment the results here.
Okay, I'm afraid the problem is still present in kernel 3.2.17-1 :-(
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:58:42AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Here's what that change looks like:
-$(BUILD_DIR)/linux-source-$(UPSTREAMVERSION).tar.bz2:
SOURCE_DIR=$(BUILD_DIR)/source
+define copy_source
+rsync --delete --exclude debian --exclude .pc --exclude .svk --exclude .svn
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
--- debian/templates/control.source.in(revision 19077)
+++ debian/templates/control.source.in(working copy)
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Uploaders: Bastian Blank
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:44:23PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
I don't know if it's regression or not but when I rebooted 3.2.18-1, kernel
oopsed during shutdown (it wasn't logged). I don't remember that happened
before.
False alarm, it wasn't kernel oops, it was X server segfault at shutdown
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:34:07AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Touko Korpela wrote:
Here is log from 3.2.18-1 kernel with X125 laptop. WARNING is there.
[...]
Linux version 3.2.0-2-686-pae (Debian 3.2.18-1)
(debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-5
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:34:10AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
Patch works, warning is gone after couple of hours of use. I let you
know if situation changes.
This patch and INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU only when tracing looks like
good to have also in upstream stable kernel.
Thanks
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:36:02AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
This patch (?) causes possible regression.
On another laptop (Asus 1215B), that doesn't use encrypted wlan and didn't
have this warning bug, now when it's updated to 3.2.18-1 kernel have
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 0.35
Severity: wishlist
Upstream repository has some new/updated firmwares available. Also it would
be good to ask if Broadcom has new firmwares available for wireless cards
(firmware-brcm80211).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:07:51AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
Although kernel 3.3 still logs the trace (despite having applied all
of the suggested the patches), there's an overall stability
improvement in the wireless driver when compared to kernel 3.2.12
where:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 02:30:24PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 03:55:56PM +0300, Markus Vuorio wrote:
no error provided, command is meant to be also run as normal user
thus assertion by report is invalid, closing.
The resulting initramfs doesn't work,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.17-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Debian folks,
the `brcmsmac` [1] module does not support IBSS [2] needed to create
ad-hoc networks [3][4][5].
This prevents for example using
Binary packages built from linux-2.6 source are now xz compressed (or was
that reverted)?
What about kernel images (vmlinuz) and initramfs images?
Is it enabled only for some architectures (arm)?
Another issue is source package. Shouldn't it be xz compressed (upstream
tarballs are available also
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:14:15PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
Another issue is source package. Shouldn't it be xz compressed (upstream
tarballs are available also in xz)?
Apparently this requires converting source package to new 3.0 format.
It seems to have good and not-so-good properties
Again failure :(
It seems that brcmsmac is enabled by some Debian patch, that don't get
enabled when building from upstream 3.2.x git tree. It would make sense
to offer current Debian kernel git tree also.
That kernel has this in dmesg:
[4.468517] b43-phy0: Broadcom 4313 WLAN found (core
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:00:05PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
It seems that brcmsmac is enabled by some Debian patch, that don't get
enabled when building from upstream 3.2.x git tree. It would make sense
to offer current Debian kernel git tree also.
There is [1
Patch works, warning is gone after couple of hours of use. I let you
know if situation changes.
This patch and INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU only when tracing looks like
good to have also in upstream stable kernel.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.17-1
Severity: normal
Samsung X125 laptop. This kind of warning was logged. Also earlier 3.2.x
kernels do this.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.2.0-2-686-pae (Debian 3.2.17-1)
(debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Here is previous warning with 3.2.16-1.
[90251.832010] [ cut here ]
[90251.832040] WARNING: at
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 03:30:14AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.16-1
Severity: normal
Thanks for brcmsmac: INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU only when tracing fix in
3.2.16-1. Kernel still prints some wlan errors, but they don't
cause major trouble in my light use
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.16-1
Severity: normal
Thanks for brcmsmac: INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU only when tracing fix in
3.2.16-1. Kernel still prints some wlan errors, but they don't
cause major trouble in my light use. Still, maybe this can be fixed.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
#hardware support
severity 654957 important
quit
Here is modified patch to add support for AMD Bulldozer (21) and Llano (18)
processors. I hope someone can check this and upload cpufrequtils.
--- debian/cpufrequtils.loadcpufreq.init.dist 2011-08-03 14:50:31.0 +0300
+++
Cpufrequtils homepage link (under kernel.org) doesn't seem to work anymore.
I found https://github.com/emagii/cpufrequtils
It says: Clone of kernel.org cpufrequtils, until it is back in business
Can it considered new home of cpufrequtils for now?
It has some changes after 008 too.
--
To
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:59:30PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Touko Korpela schrieb am Saturday, den 28. April 2012:
Squeeze-backports is at version 0.99, while wheezy/sid has now 0.102
That per se is no reason for a backport.
If backport is already available (like this package
Squeeze-backports is at version 0.99, while wheezy/sid has now 0.102
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120428204732.GA11166@lisko
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:04:36PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Teodor MICU wrote:
I just tested this (linux image from stable-proposed-updates) and
there is no change: the console is fuzzy during boot.
Great, thanks for testing. How about the second question --- is the
radeon
Installer has also a bug report about this (#661069).
It would be good if Debian kernel radeon driver learned to fall back
sensibly if running on hardware where firmware is required.
Also installer should warn user about what happens if firmware is missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I'm seeing a lot of kernel log entries like this under wheezy kernels:
ieee80211 phy0: brcms_c_dotxstatus: INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU
This patch should hide them:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/89512
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:14:52AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 04:16 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16292
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:37:51PM +0400, Boris Pek wrote:
Hi,
startx command launched LXDE (I have both KDE and LXDE) and it
worked normally.
Thanks --- this is a very useful detail. So probably non-accelarated
rendering works fine, and it is something in 3d codepaths that makes
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:23:47PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 11:40:02 Michael Prokop wrote:
* David Baron [Wed Feb 15, 2012 at 10:49:53AM +0200]:
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
On attempted upgrade
From which initramfs-tools version are
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:14:52AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 04:16 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16292
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16292
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 12:06:05AM -0600, Robert Keevil wrote:
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 007-2
Severity: normal
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 09:33:28AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 19:02 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
reassign 649448 src:linux-2.6 linux-2.6/3.0.0-3
severity 649448 important
retitle 649448
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 01:41:17PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
Should current kernel Break cpufrequtils versions lower than 007-2 because of
bug #636141?
Any comment on this? I think squeeze users (or others that still use 007-1)
using wheezy/sid kernel may have broken cpu frequency scaling
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Jort Koopmans wrote:
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 14:05 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
[..]
madduck called testing for experimental version of mdadm. where it can be
downloaded?
My bad, I missed the initscripts package from sid (instead of testing).
I must
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Jort Koopmans wrote:
Is there anything else I can do to triage this bug? I'd be happy to try
any suggestions to get this bug solved (in a future release).
Waiting for any response,
Jort Koopmans
madduck called testing for experimental version of
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:51:46AM +0100, Ad L. wrote:
(Re-sent to the correct address)
I really should spend time on studying for an exam coming up in a few
days, and reportbug doesn't seem to run as it should, or it secretly
sent a mail twice. Tried it as normal user and as root, but
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 09:57:05PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011, Touko Korpela wrote:
I suspect that -h option that halt gets during poweroff is buggy and
shouldn't spin disks up that are already at sleep.
Nowadays we're supposed to trust the kernel to do
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:29:06PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 09:57:05PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Nowadays we're supposed to trust the kernel to do it right, and your disk
should spin up only if it has crap firmware (unlikely). Unless you're using
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:16:34PM +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
Hi,
Since I have a hardware failure now and have not reported this bug
upstream yet, I would be glad, if you, Antony, could take care of
this.
For the same reason, I cannot say anything about ogg123.
Some time ago, I
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:52:44PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 17:04 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
[1] http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/HDA_Analyzer
Unfortunately, Alsa upstream support seems to be nonexistent lately. Nobody
takes any action on bugs
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:26PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
this guy is adding to much
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname output? Maybe it
can be added to kernel version string, uname -v (now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17
05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This information is present in /proc/version and could be in uname
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:27:10AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
tags 638878 + moreinfo
thanks
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:48:24PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
valentijn, hi,
Your messages don't reach valentijn if you only send mail to bugnumber
address...people aren't automatically subscribed to bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:47:24PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote:
After making some backups, I tried to upgrade the kernel again.
Guess what? It just works now.
The term.log section looks nothing like the one above.
Also the old kernel has been retained.
Please use reply fuction when
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-3
Severity: important
Plug/unplug (interface disconnected)/plug cycle with Huawei E1552 USB 3G modem
(also emulates cdrom) sometimes causes kernel oops.
Wlan was disabled at crash time.
Oops message is at end of this message.
-- Package-specific info:
**
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:19:21AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:17 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
I noticed that firmware-nonfree (0.30) has updated brcm80211 firmware that
contains unspecified stability fixes.
Maybe updated firmware-nonfree should go to stable updates
I noticed that firmware-nonfree (0.30) has updated brcm80211 firmware that
contains unspecified stability fixes.
Maybe updated firmware-nonfree should go to stable updates too?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Maybe you could take a look for reportbug script code example from
glibc. They added script for preventing bogus bug reports against their
package. Could same be added to kernel package telling it's bug in
yaird and not in kernel?
In my opinion you should keep support for alternate initrd
Is fix for this freeze included in recent kernels?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
reopen 434597
severity 434597 grave
#reassigning to yaird, you shouldn't close bugs too fast
reassign 434597 yaird 0.0.12-20
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Why did you downgrade this to normal?
And didn't you have policy of a bug to be at least important severity
for a fix to be included in stable kernel update.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 430887
thanks
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=4.0 (installer build 20070127-03:50)
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom
umame -a: Linux portatel 2.6.18-3-486 #1 Sun Dec 10 18:57:11 UTC 2006
i686 unknown
Your CD isn't official etch 4.0 but older. I
Pump is buggy, please try dhcp3-client instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You should fix your mail system not to send quoted-printable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this patch still needed in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 or 2.6.20-1 ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
75 matches
Mail list logo
