On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
should also be true for out-of-tree modules which may receive very
little
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@frijolero.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 14:47 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
It seems this taint flag will be used for driers backported through
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:55:28 -0400, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:41:37AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
I think we need a taint_string() function, and instead of lockdep
disabling itself it should note the taint string in its reports.
Similarly for
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:41:37AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:08:34 -0400, Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com
wrote:
On 2011-10-25 22:54 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200,
* Rusty Russell (ru...@rustcorp.com.au) wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:17:24 -0400, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
commit 7816c45bf13255157c00fb8aca86cb64d825e878
Author: Roland Vossen rvos...@broadcom.com
Date: Thu Apr 7 11:20:58 2011 +0200
modules: Enabled dynamic debugging
On 2011-10-25 22:54 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
This is not the case: lockdep works fine with staging
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:08:34 -0400, Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com
wrote:
On 2011-10-25 22:54 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:41:37AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
I think we need a taint_string() function, and instead of lockdep
disabling itself it should note the taint string in its reports.
Similarly for anything else (oops already does this).
you mean like print_tainted() ?
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:26 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:57:03 -0700, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote:
On 10/24/11 06:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:38 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2011-10-25 14:26 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Subject: module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:12:28 +0200
Use of the GPL or a
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2011-10-25 18:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:38 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
This patch prevents the use of lockdep for debugging out of tree
modules, which is rather mean.
It was already disabled
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2011-10-25 18:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:38 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
This patch prevents the use of lockdep for debugging
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2011-10-25 18:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:38 -0400, Nick Bowler
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:17:24 -0400, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
commit 7816c45bf13255157c00fb8aca86cb64d825e878
Author: Roland Vossen rvos...@broadcom.com
Date: Thu Apr 7 11:20:58 2011 +0200
modules: Enabled dynamic debugging for staging modules
...
Signed-off-by:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
should also be true for out-of-tree modules which may receive very
little review.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
---
Debian has been
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:12:28PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
should also be true for out-of-tree modules which may receive very
little review.
On 10/24/11 06:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
should also be true for out-of-tree modules which may receive very
little review.
Signed-off-by: Ben
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:57:03 -0700, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote:
On 10/24/11 06:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
should also be true for
21 matches
Mail list logo
