Hi Simon
2.4.27-12 has been released into sid, this is a call to rebuild for
all the different architectures. So far it is only available for i386
(which I built). I'll get powerpc rolling, I had mistakenly thought it
was removed from Sid. Perhaps it should be, we can address that
another
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:57:49AM +0900, Horms wrote:
2.4.27-12 has been released into sid, this is a call to rebuild for all
the different architectures. So far it is only available for i386 (which
I built). I'll get powerpc rolling, I had mistakenly thought it was
removed from Sid. Perhaps
Horms wrote:
2.4.27-12 has been released into sid, this is a call to rebuild for all
the different architectures. So far it is only available for i386 (which
I built). I'll get powerpc rolling, I had mistakenly thought it was
removed from Sid. Perhaps it should be, we can address that another
2.4.27-12 has been released into sid, this is a call to rebuild for all
the different architectures. So far it is only available for i386 (which
I built). I'll get powerpc rolling, I had mistakenly thought it was
removed from Sid. Perhaps it should be, we can address that another day.
I'm happy
Hi,
I know this thread kind of miandered off into how to move beyond
2.4.27, but as progress there is likely to be slow I am going
ahead and uploading 2.4.27-12. Holger took a bit of a look
over it and couldn't find anything drasticaly wrong. And it does
have some bug fixes, so hopefully we are
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 15 lines --]
Horms wrote:
Holger kindly reminded me on IRC yesterday that its been
a long time since a new 2.4.27 was uploaded into Sarge.
He pointed out that there are a number of valuable
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:13:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Horms wrote:
Holger kindly reminded me on IRC yesterday that its been
a long time since a new 2.4.27 was uploaded into Sarge.
He pointed out that there are a number of valuable fixes
in SVN.
Is there any reason why you're
Hi,
On Monday 28 November 2005 10:05, Sven Luther wrote:
... for a kernel which is aimed at
going away before the etch release anyway...
I don't think this is true (for debian as a whole). Sorry. Removing 2.4 is not
a etch release goal as defined by the release managers.
And it's also
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:08:24PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 28 November 2005 10:05, Sven Luther wrote:
... for a kernel which is aimed at
going away before the etch release anyway...
I don't think this is true (for debian as a whole). Sorry. Removing 2.4 is
not
a
Horms wrote:
Holger kindly reminded me on IRC yesterday that its been
a long time since a new 2.4.27 was uploaded into Sarge.
He pointed out that there are a number of valuable fixes
in SVN.
Is there any reason why you're sticking with 2.4.27+patches rather than
following the 2.4 series
Hi,
Holger kindly reminded me on IRC yesterday that its been
a long time since a new 2.4.27 was uploaded into Sarge.
He pointed out that there are a number of valuable fixes
in SVN.
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/dists/trunk/kernel-2.4/source/kernel-source-2.4.27-2.4.27/?rev=0sc=0
I'll also
11 matches
Mail list logo
