On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:44:29PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
- Allow us to fix detection problems without to need a kernel upload;
As the modules checks against it own table, this is a noop.
- Allow by arch specific modules;
The modules may specify that also.
- Allow by kernel
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:57:30AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is also a proposal that at install time scans
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:31:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
Speaking of kernel flavours (we weren't, but what the hey); is the plan
still to reduce all of the x86 flavours down to two: generic x86 and
generic x86-smp?
Still?
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:03:46AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:31:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
Speaking of kernel flavours (we weren't, but what the hey); is the plan
still to reduce all of the x86
Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 10/31/05, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are not using discover2 yet, but discover1, and i thought the way to the
future was to use hotplug only, as ubuntu did ?
In installer itself, for sure. But discover2 has some important
On 10/31/05, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are not using discover2 yet, but discover1, and i thought the way to the
future was to use hotplug only, as ubuntu did ?
In installer itself, for sure. But discover2 has some important
feature that cannot be satisfied by hotplug or
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:03:46AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:31:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
Speaking of kernel flavours (we weren't, but what the hey); is the plan
still to reduce all of the x86
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
modules to find those needed by the host system I will be happier
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:57:30AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
modules to find
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:46:30 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
As said, i think that the only way to solve this for debian-installer would be
to follow up with my plan, and mandate a policy of all packaged modules to
provide .debs and
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:46:30 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
As said, i think that the only way to solve this for debian-installer would
be
to follow up with my
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:46:30 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
As said, i think that the only way to solve this for debian-installer would
be
to follow up with my plan,
* Anand Kumria wrote:
I can recall quite a number of incident where i've moved a disk from
an athlon k6 to k7 (and vice versa) and found random failures until
I picked the right kernel package.
Hu? Running a k6 kernel on a k7 shouldn't be a problem.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello all,
Well, as you may have noticed, we uploaded 2.6.14-1 to unstable yesterday, we
needed 6 hours from when i was made aware of the upstream release and the
moment it entered NEW, and missed dinstall only by a couple of hours, so the
packages are now in incoming and not unstable, we should
* Sven Luther wrote:
but alpha, hppa and arm all three had commits fixing the FTBFS a few
hours after the upload, so as soon as we get confirmation of the
build success, we can do -2.
Confirmed for alpha, 2.6.14-2 builds fine.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Alle 08:06, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, Sven Luther ha scritto:
Hello all,
Well, as you may have noticed, we uploaded 2.6.14-1 to unstable yesterday,
Really Good Job, it's nearly incredible fast!
Ok, let's finish with the next things to work on :
- clear the external module situation.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 09:42:58AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Sven Luther wrote:
but alpha, hppa and arm all three had commits fixing the FTBFS a few
hours after the upload, so as soon as we get confirmation of the
build success, we can do -2.
Confirmed for alpha, 2.6.14-2 builds
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
modules to find those needed by the host system I will be happier :-)
That can be one area where discover2 can work. It has some good and
flexible enough database for it. We only
Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
modules to find those needed by the host system I will be happier :-)
That can be one area where discover2 can work. It has some
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
modules to find those needed by the host system I will be happier :-)
That can be one
20 matches
Mail list logo
