Re: 2.6.20 broken on several arches

2007-04-11 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:27:45PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What should we do about this topic? As we need the version in testing and linux-libc-dev for use by glibc ASAP, I think about dropping all images for this arches for now until it is

Re: 2.6.20 broken on several arches

2007-04-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 03:48:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:27:45PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What should we do about this topic? As we need the version in testing and linux-libc-dev for use by glibc ASAP, I think

Re: 2.6.20 broken on several arches

2007-04-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:58:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: Kyle created a patch for 2.6.20 that I've committed in r8460. I've got a few more config changes to commit, then hppa should be ready. The patch conflicts with other patches. Bastian -- It would be illogical to kill without

Re: 2.6.20 broken on several arches

2007-04-11 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:25:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:58:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: Kyle created a patch for 2.6.20 that I've committed in r8460. I've got a few more config changes to commit, then hppa should be ready. The patch conflicts with other

2.6.20 broken on several arches

2007-04-10 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks 2.6.20 is broken on the following arches: alpha, hppa, mips and mipsel. I fixed mips and mipsel by dropping the broken sb1250 uart patch. I did not dig into the alpha and hppa errors. What should we do about this topic? As we need the version in testing and linux-libc-dev for use by

Re: 2.6.20 broken on several arches

2007-04-10 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:48:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks 2.6.20 is broken on the following arches: alpha, hppa, mips and mipsel. I fixed mips and mipsel by dropping the broken sb1250 uart patch. I did not dig into the alpha and hppa errors. What should we do about this

Re: 2.6.20 broken on several arches

2007-04-10 Thread Otavio Salvador
Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What should we do about this topic? As we need the version in testing and linux-libc-dev for use by glibc ASAP, I think about dropping all images for this arches for now until it is fixed (which may correlate with the availability of 2.6.21 ...).

Re: 2.6.20 broken on several arches

2007-04-10 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:46:42AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:48:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks 2.6.20 is broken on the following arches: alpha, hppa, mips and mipsel. I fixed mips and mipsel by dropping the broken sb1250 uart patch. I did not