Hi Dann:
It's a good news. But we find another problem, if there is an SATA
ODD
besides the SATA HDD connected to the host, Debian can NOT boot up,
these are many SATA related error messages. We need more debug on
this
issue. There is a known SB600 SATA ODD error message problem, we
will
Hi Dann:
The Snapshots Status:
http://stats.buildserver.net/packages/status.php?email=debian-kernelpac
kages=arches=subdist=kernel-dists
also marked many Failed to kernel 2.6.18.dfsg.1-14~snapshot.9251
Is there some problem in the kernel version
2.6.18.dfsg.1-14~snapshot.9249
and
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:43:47PM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
Hi Dann:
The Snapshots Status:
http://stats.buildserver.net/packages/status.php?email=debian-kernelpac
kages=arches=subdist=kernel-dists
also marked many Failed to kernel 2.6.18.dfsg.1-14~snapshot.9251
Is there some
Hi Dann:
Were you able to test this on an SB600 as well? I want to make sure we
don't regress that support.
The kernel 2.6.18-5-k7 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-14~snapshot.9304)
can also boot on SB600 board. But there are also many ODD error
messages when booting up if SATA ODD is connected, we need
Hi Dann:
On that note, I've backported the various patches you've pointed me
to and committed them as they are all now upstream. This will result
in snapshot builds which you can pull and test. See the snapshots
section for etch here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
This was
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:14:55PM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
The Snapshots Status:
http://stats.buildserver.net/packages/status.php?email=debian-kernelpac
kages=arches=subdist=kernel-dists
also marked many Failed to kernel 2.6.18.dfsg.1-14~snapshot.9251
Is there some problem in the kernel
Hi Dann:
Do you mean you need our test to the point release kernel on
SB700/SB600?
I think I can ask our QA's help to test it.
Great, that helps a great deal.
Adding Mick into this thread.
I have asked our QA Mick to help test this issue, but as you know,
We are also busy with many
Hi Dann:
Do you mean you need our test to the point release kernel on
SB700/SB600?
I think I can ask our QA's help to test it. And I have one question
here:
Is there any installation CD/DVD ISO image of point release, which can
be
downloaded and burnt into CD/DVD? (It seems that there is no such
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 03:17:30PM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
Hi Dann:
Do you mean you need our test to the point release kernel on
SB700/SB600?
I think I can ask our QA's help to test it.
Great, that helps a great deal.
And I have one question
here:
Is there any installation CD/DVD
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:25:49PM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
Greetings:
More SATA device IDs should be added to support sb700 completely,
otherwise
Debian may fail to be installed on ATI SB700 when set onchip SATA type
in BIOS into AHCI mode. There are four SATA related device IDs in
-Original Message-
From: Shane Huang
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:04 PM
To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Henry Su; Shane Huang
Subject: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian
Greetings:
This is Shane.
We have four patches for AMD/ATI SB700, and we will full support SB700
until
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:55:35AM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
Hi Dann:
Do you know of any reason these changes wouldn't work on a 2.6.18
base? Would you be able to run QA on one of our daily builds if I
pointed you to snapshot debs with these changes?
I'm sorry that I do not catch
Message-
From: dann frazier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 10:50 PM
To: Shane Huang
Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org; Henry Su
Subject: Re: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:55:35AM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
Hi Dann:
Do you know of any
Greetings:
This is Shane.
We have four patches for AMD/ATI SB700, and we will full support SB700
until 2.6.23-rc1. The four patches have been accepted by kernel org and
the applied kernel version are listed as below:
1.SMBus device ID 2.6.23-rc1
Upstream commit:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:03:33PM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
If next Debian release(4.1?) will use the linux
kernel
after 2.6.23-rc1, then that's good and you may discard this mail.
It will.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:03:33PM +0800, Shane Huang wrote:
Greetings:
This is Shane.
We have four patches for AMD/ATI SB700, and we will full support SB700
until 2.6.23-rc1. The four patches have been accepted by kernel org and
the applied kernel version are listed as below:
1.SMBus
Hi Dann:
Do you know of any reason these changes wouldn't work on a 2.6.18
base? Would you be able to run QA on one of our daily builds if I
pointed you to snapshot debs with these changes?
I'm sorry that I do not catch your meaning very much because I'm a
newbie
in Debian, I did not use
Hi Dann:
Do you know of any reason these changes wouldn't work on a 2.6.18
base? Would you be able to run QA on one of our daily builds if I
pointed you to snapshot debs with these changes?
You may send me the daily builds snapshot URL first, so that we can
check the source code first to see
Package: kernel
Version: older than 2.6.22
We have four patches for AMD/ATI SB700, and we will full support SB700
until 2.6.23-rc1. The four patches have been accepted by kernel org and
the applied kernel version are listed as following:
1.SMBus device ID 2.6.23-rc1
2.IDE device ID 2.6.22
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:32:10 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#429622: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
20 matches
Mail list logo
