On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 15:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Or shall we wait until we are bumping for some other reason?
[...]
Can do. In which case: apply them, test the result and then comment
them out in series/base with a leading comment that they're to be
enabled at the next ABI bump.
I
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 21:17 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk [2012-04-08 11:10]:
These Dreamplug patches add DT support for kirkwood in a way which is
designed not to interfere with existing non-DT
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 12:45 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 21:17 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk [2012-04-08 11:10]:
These Dreamplug patches add DT support for kirkwood in a way
* Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk [2012-04-08 11:10]:
These Dreamplug patches add DT support for kirkwood in a way which is
designed not to interfere with existing non-DT platforms and more
generally upstream has done things in a way that FDT and ATAG platforms
can safely be supported using
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk [2012-04-08 11:10]:
These Dreamplug patches add DT support for kirkwood in a way which is
designed not to interfere with existing non-DT platforms and more
generally upstream has done things in a
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 15:09 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:39 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
An initial set of patches for the Dreamplug (basically a descendant of
shivaplug, guruplug etc, see [0]) have been accepted into the
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:39 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
An initial set of patches for the Dreamplug (basically a descendant of
shivaplug, guruplug etc, see [0]) have been accepted into the ARM SoC
maintainer's tree.
Would it be acceptable to
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 15:09 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:39 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
An initial set of patches for the Dreamplug (basically a descendant of
shivaplug, guruplug etc, see [0]) have been accepted into the
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:39 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
An initial set of patches for the Dreamplug (basically a descendant of
shivaplug, guruplug etc, see [0]) have been accepted into the ARM SoC
maintainer's tree.
Would it be acceptable to backport these to the Wheezy kernel? I'm happy
to
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 02:57 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:39 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
An initial set of patches for the Dreamplug (basically a descendant of
shivaplug, guruplug etc, see [0]) have been accepted into the ARM SoC
maintainer's tree.
Would it be
An initial set of patches for the Dreamplug (basically a descendant of
shivaplug, guruplug etc, see [0]) have been accepted into the ARM SoC
maintainer's tree.
Would it be acceptable to backport these to the Wheezy kernel? I'm happy
to do the backporting and test them etc. I recently started
11 matches
Mail list logo
