The patches are being put upstream by developers far better than me -
but it will take time.
I just had a painful time trying to trim down the patchset but it's
not likely to be below 100 for a while yet.
The Asahi team are doing a good job of keeping them rebased onto the
latest kernel and I'm
I believe the Asahi team has them all submitted via the various relevant
maintainers
and they are working their way through the groups. Some patches make
significant
changes and there is obviously discussion about whether they need to be
reworked
before being passed up.
That said there was this
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 11:36:40AM +1000, Andrew Worsley wrote:
> Thanks Diederik, so I'm guessing 173 is way too much but a lot of it might
> not
> be critical to something running on the M1 (versus M2).
>
> If I was to find a smaller set of say 10 patches to 5.19 that booted a
> usable
> system
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 02:00, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On donderdag 4 augustus 2022 14:40:14 CEST Andrew Worsley wrote:
> > I am wondering if there are any plans for supporting Asahi/M1 linux in
> > the debian kernels?
> > At the moment there are about 173 patches from the v5.19 kernel - see
> >
On donderdag 4 augustus 2022 14:40:14 CEST Andrew Worsley wrote:
> I am wondering if there are any plans for supporting Asahi/M1 linux in
> the debian kernels?
> At the moment there are about 173 patches from the v5.19 kernel - see
> https://paste.debian.net/1249157/
The normal course of action
I am wondering if there are any plans for supporting Asahi/M1 linux in
the debian kernels?
At the moment there are about 173 patches from the v5.19 kernel - see
https://paste.debian.net/1249157/
Is that too many to be practical for debian arm64 building?
What about an experimental kernel?
Is a
6 matches
Mail list logo
