On 7/14/23 01:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Dixi quod…
My guess here is that it’s, as usual, the fault of qemu-user,
Strong evidence for that: doesn’t look like it even executes
one bit of klibc code:
$ qemu-arm-static -d cpu ./fstype --help
qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
Dixi quod…
>My guess here is that it’s, as usual, the fault of qemu-user,
Strong evidence for that: doesn’t look like it even executes
one bit of klibc code:
$ qemu-arm-static -d cpu ./fstype --help
qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped
Segmentation fault (core
Hi Helge,
>Can you check if this patch fixes the problem:
>https://patchew.org/QEMU/mvmpm55qnno@suse.de/
>(linux-user: make sure brk(0) returns a page-aligned value, from Andreas
>Schwab)
I doubt it, klibc malloc uses mmap(2) normally.
(And given I tested it on a bullseye system, the
Dixi quod…
>My guess here is that it’s, as usual, the fault of qemu-user,
>which has multiple outstanding emulation bugs, some of which
>affecting klibc-built binaries especially, though this, since
>a statically linked mksh works, is probably an issue with how
>qemu-user handles .interp *shrug*
4 matches
Mail list logo
